HCA 13/70 f.435r Annotate - Revision history

ColinGreenstreet at 18:57, November 15, 2015

2015-11-15T18:57:59Z

ColinGreenstreet at 12:53, November 15, 2015

2015-11-15T12:53:02Z

ColinGreenstreet at 12:16, April 22, 2015

2015-04-22T12:16:51Z

Jillwilcox at 14:01, November 8, 2014

2014-11-08T14:01:49Z

RachelCarter at 12:04, November 2, 2014

2014-11-02T12:04:28Z

RachelCarter at 15:47, October 25, 2014

2014-10-25T15:47:58Z

ColinGreenstreet at 17:45, August 27, 2014

2014-08-27T17:45:43Z

New page

{{PageMetaData
|Parent volume=HCA 13/70
|Folio=435
|Side=Recto
|Editorial history=Created 16/08/14, by CSG

}}{{PageHelp}}
{{PageTranscription
|Transcription image=[[File:IMG_0483.JPG|thumbnail|800px|none|HCA 13/70 f.435r: Right click on image for full size image in separate window]]

|Transcription=XXXX

}}

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 |Folio=435
 |Side=Recto
-|Status=Uploaed image; transcribed on 08/11/2014
+|Status=Uploaded image; transcribed on 08/11/2014
 |First transcriber=Rachel Carter
 |First transcribed=2014/11/08

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 |Folio=435
 |Side=Recto
-|Status=First transcribed by Rachel Carter; edited by Jill Wilcox 8/11/2014
+|Status=Uploaed image; transcribed on 08/11/2014
 |First transcriber=Rachel Carter
 |First transcribed=2014/11/08
 }}
 {{PageHelp}}
 {{PageTranscription
-|Transcription image=[[File:IMG_0483.JPG|thumbnail|800px|none|HCA 13/70 f.435r: Right click on image for full size image in separate window]]
+|Transcription image={{#transcription-image: IMG_0483.JPG}}
 |Transcription=The 2nd of July 1655
@@ Line 16: / Line 18: @@
 examined upon the said allegation.
-'''D. T. Holding? 4us''' &#91;LH SIDE&#93;
+'''Dt. Holding'''
 '''James Snowden''' of Wapping in the parrish

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 |Folio=435
 |Side=Recto
-|Status=First transcribed by Rachel Carter; Edited by Jill Wilcox 8/11/2014
+|Status=First transcribed by Rachel Carter; edited by Jill Wilcox 8/11/2014
-−
 |First transcriber=Rachel Carter
+|First transcribed=2014/11/08
-|Editorial history=Created 16/08/14, by CSG
+}}
 {{PageHelp}}
 }}{{PageHelp}}
 {{PageTranscription
 |Transcription image=[[File:IMG_0483.JPG|thumbnail|800px|none|HCA 13/70 f.435r: Right click on image for full size image in separate window]]
 |Transcription=The 2nd of July 1655
@@ Line 66: / Line 63: @@
 said Richard le Bas, and hath sewall times served him both in
 transporting goods from hence into ffrance, and from ffrance hither
 }}

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 |Folio=435
 |Side=Recto
 |First transcriber=Rachel Carter
@@ Line 17: / Line 19: @@
 examined upon the said allegation.
-D. T. Holding? 4us
+'''D. T. Holding? 4us''' &#91;LH SIDE&#93;
-James Snowden of Wapping in the parish
+'''James Snowden''' of Wapping in the parrish
 of Stepney in the countie of Middlesex, Marriner
 aged 40 years or thereabouts a wittnesse sworne and
@@ Line 28: / Line 30: @@
 Sunderland ever since about 5 or 6 yeares since, at which time shee belonged
 to the port of Sunderland, and was then under the Command of one Sampson
-Nicholson, who in or about the moneth of November 1653 lawfully?
+Nicholson, who in or about the moneth of November 1653 last past
-sold and disposed of the said wessell to the arlate Richard le Bas and
+sold and disposed of the said Vessell to the arlate Richard le Bas and
 Peter Knight Merchants living here in London, who constituted one Robbins
-to be Master and Commander of her for their use and accompte and so
+to be Master and Commander of her for their use and accompt and so
-much the said Robbins did sewall times intimate say and declare her their
+much the said Robbins did sewall times intimate say and declare to this
-Deponent both here at London and in ffrance, and that the Said le Bas and Knight were
+Deponent both here at London and in ffrance, and that the Said Le Bas and Knight were
 the true and lawfull Owners of the Same or to that effect as also by the
 declaration of the Said Richard le Bas, who shortly after the buying
-of the Said wessel desired this deponent to take the Care and Conduct of
+of the Said Vessel desired this deponent to take the Care and Conduct of
-her upon him, which this deponent then refused as being then the provider? of
+her upon him, which this deponent then refused as being then the provided of
-another wessel, And saith That shortly after this deponent sailed in
+another Vessel, And saith That shortly after this deponent sailed in
-Command with the said wessel (the Said Robbins Master) towards the Coast
+Command with the said Vessel (the Said Robbins Master) towards the Coast
 of ffrance, and afterwards saw her at Caen, the said Robbins then
-Being dispossessed of her by order of her said Owner at ne?? there
+being dispossessed of her by order of her said Owner as was there
-generally? reported the said wessel then being under the Command
+generally reported the said Vessel then being under the Command
 of a fflemish Skipp, But what passed at Caen comprising the sale
 of ¾ parts of the said shipp, as is alleadged this deponent saith he doeth
@@ Line 55: / Line 57: @@
 Bas for about 3 yeares last past, during which time the said
 le Bas hath lived in this City of this deponent knowledge and for sewall
-yeares before according to common report, such hath been and is
+yeares before according to common report, and hath been and is
 esteemed a Merchant of this Citie and a subject of this Commonwealth
 and in that quality to pay all dues and dueties required of him, and saith
-the said le Bas did of this deponent observation? fitt and furnish out the said
+the said le Bas did of this deponent observation fitt and furnish out the said
-shipp in Contoversie to sea upon the woiage wherein shee went out after hee
+shipp in Contoversie to sea upon the Voiage wherein shee went out after hee
 had first so bought her, which he knoweth for the reasons predeposed, and for
 that hee this deponent hath been for all that time well acquainted with the
 said Richard le Bas, and hath sewall times served him both in
-transporting goods from heure into ffrance, and from ffrance hither
+transporting goods from hence into ffrance, and from ffrance hither
 }}

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 |Transcription=The 2nd of July 1655
-The clayme of Richard Le Bas for the ''Dolphin'' alias ''fortune''. Suckley Budd examined upon the said allegation.
+The clayme of Richard le Bas for the ''Dolphin''
 D. T. Holding? 4us
-James Snowden of Wapping in the parish of Stepney in the countie of Middlesex, Marriner: aged 40 years or thereabouts a wittnesse sworne and examined saith and deposeth as followeth videlicet:
+James Snowden of Wapping in the parish
-To the first (and 2nd) Article of the said Allegation he saith and deposeth, That hee this Deponent hath knowne the shipp the ''Dolphin'' alias the ''ffortune'' or ''hopewell?'' of Sunderland ever since about 5 or 6 yeares since, at which time shee belonged to the port of Sunderland, and was then under the Command of one Sampson Nicholson, who in or about the moneth of November 1653 lawfully? sold and disposed of the said wessell to the arlate Richard Le Bas and Peter Knight Merchants living here in London, who constituted one Robbins to be Master and Commander of her for their use and accompte and so much the said Robbins did sewall times intimate say and declare her their Deponent both here at London and in ffrance, and that the Said Le Bas and Knight were the true and lawfull Owners of the Same or to that effect as also by the declaration of the Said Richard Le Bas, who shortly after the buying of the Said wessel desired this deponent to take the Care and Conduct of her upon him, which this Deponent then refused as being then the provider? of another wessel, And saith That shortly after this Deponent sailed in Command with the said wessel (the Said Robbins Master) towards the Coast of ffrance, and afterwards saw her at Caen, the said Robbins then Being dispossessed of her by order of her said Owner at (…?) there  generally? reported the said wessel then being under the Command of a fflemish Skipp, But what passed at Caen comprising the sale of ¾ parts of the said shipp, as is alleadged this Deponent saith he doeth not know, nor is at all acquainted with any such transaction. And further hee cannot depose.
+To the first (and 2nd) Article of the said Allegation he saith and deposeth, That hee this
-To the third article and to the schedule our bill of sale annexed hee Saith hee knoweth nothing thereof otherwise or further than hee hath now predeposed.
+To the third article and to the schedule our bill of sale annexed hee
-To the 4th hee Saith, hee this Deponent hath knowne the arlate Richard Le Bas for about 3 yeares last past, during which time the said Le Bas hath lived in this City of this Deponent knowledge and for sewall yeares before according to common report, such hath been and is esteemed a Merchant of this Citie and a subject of this Commonwealth and in that quality to pay all dues and dueties required of him, and saith the said Le Bas Did of this Deponent observation? fitt and furnish out the said ship in Contoversie to sea upon the woiage wherein shee went out after hee had first so bought her, which he knoweth for the reasons predeposed, and for that hee this Deponent hath been for all that time well acquainted with the said Richard Le Bas, and hath sewall times served him both in transporting goods from heure into ffrance, and from ffrance hither
+To the 4th hee Saith, hee this deponent hath knowne the arlate Richard le
 }}