HCA 13/70 f.443r Annotate - Revision history

ColinGreenstreet at 12:47, August 8, 2016

2016-08-08T12:47:23Z

ColinGreenstreet at 12:47, August 8, 2016

2016-08-08T12:47:01Z

ColinGreenstreet at 12:44, August 8, 2016

2016-08-08T12:44:17Z

ColinGreenstreet at 19:02, November 15, 2015

2015-11-15T19:02:35Z

Jillwilcox at 16:07, January 1, 2015

2015-01-01T16:07:33Z

Jillwilcox at 21:41, December 8, 2014

2014-12-08T21:41:23Z

Jillwilcox at 15:07, November 30, 2014

2014-11-30T15:07:08Z

EmiliejaneFarrimond at 18:23, November 19, 2014

2014-11-19T18:23:51Z

ColinGreenstreet at 14:41, August 28, 2014

2014-08-28T14:41:10Z

New page

{{PageMetaData
|Parent volume=HCA 13/70
|Folio=443
|Side=Recto
|Editorial history=Created 27/08/14, by CSG

}}{{PageHelp}}
{{PageTranscription
|Transcription image=[[File:IMG_0499.JPG|thumbnail|800px|none|HCA 13/70 f.443r: Right click on image for full size image in separate window]]

|Transcription=XXXX

}}

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 |Transcription=The sixth of July 1655/ &#91;CENTRE HEADING&#93;
-ames Cowes of London Merchant against vessel the&#125;
+James Cowes of London Merchant against vessel the&#125;
 ''John and Elizabeth'' of which Edward Keene is master&#125;
 and against the saith Edward Keene Suckley Smith&#125;

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 |Folio=443
 |Side=Recto
-|Status=Uploaded image; transcribed
+|Status=Uploaded image; transcribed on 19/11/2014
 |First transcriber=Emilie Farrimond
-|Editorial history=Edited on 30/11/14 by Jill Wilcox
+|First transcribed=2014/11/19
 |Note=IMAGE: IMG_0499.JPG
 }}
@@ Line 18: / Line 19: @@
 Examined upon an allegation arlate given in the
-th of May 1655 on the behalfe of the sayd Counsell/
+th of May 1655 on the behalfe of the sayd Cowsel/
 '''2nd'''

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 |Transcription image={{#transcription-image: IMG_0499.JPG}}
 |Transcription=The sixth of July 1655/ &#91;CENTRE HEADING&#93;
-'''James Cowes''' of London Merchant against vessel the
-''John and Elizabeth'' of which Edward Keene is master
+ames Cowes of London Merchant against vessel the&#125;
-and against the saith '''Edward Keene Suckley''' Smith
+''John and Elizabeth'' of which Edward Keene is master&#125;
 Examined upon an allegation arlate given in the

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 |Folio=443
 |Side=Recto
-|Status=First transcribed by Emilie Farrimond; Edited by Jill Wilcox 30/11/14
+|Status=Uploaded image; transcribed
-−
 |First transcriber=Emilie Farrimond
+|Editorial history=Edited on 30/11/14 by Jill Wilcox
-|Editorial history=Created 27/08/14, by CSG
+|Note=IMAGE: IMG_0499.JPG
 }}
-}}{{PageHelp}}
+{{PageHelp}}
 {{PageTranscription
-|Transcription image=[[File:IMG_0499.JPG|thumbnail|800px|none|HCA 13/70 f.443r: Right click on image for full size image in separate window]]
+|Transcription image={{#transcription-image: IMG_0499.JPG}}
-−
 |Transcription=The sixth of July 1655/ &#91;CENTRE HEADING&#93;
 '''James Cowes''' of London Merchant against vessel the
@@ Line 75: / Line 73: @@
 charges in attending thereabouts and ?famoneth both parties litigant alike in respect
 of this cause And further cannot answere./
 }}

@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 hee cannot depose./
-To the 4th and scheduled therein menconed cannot depose
+To the 4th and scheduled therein mentioned cannot depose
-To the 5th saving his forgiving deposition hee cannot depose/
+To the 5th saving his forgoeing deposition hee cannot depose/
-To the 6th hee saith that  hee this deponent being on board the vessel the ''John and Elizabeth''
+To the 6th hee saith that hee this deponent being on board the vessel the ''John and Elizabeth''
 arlate at St Lucar and coming home to their port of London in her well knoweth the sayd
 vessel did at St Lucar aforesayd take in divers goods to be thence transported to
@@ Line 62: / Line 62: @@
 and further cannot depose./
-To the last hee saith his forgiving deposition is true./
+To the last hee saith his forgoeing deposition is true./
-to the Interrogatories &#91;CENTRE HEADING&#93;
+To the Interrogatories &#91;CENTRE HEADING&#93;
-to the first interrogatorie hee saith hee was required to appeare and testifie his knowledge
+To the first Interrogatorie hee saith hee was required to appeare and testifie his knowledge
 in this cause by a person whose name hee knoweth not, who told this rendent that if
 hee would not voluntarily appeare soe to doe hee should be compelled or to that effect
@@ Line 73: / Line 73: @@
 the parties litigant prevaile in this cause and saith hee is not any waies allyed or
 servant to the producent nor expecteth any reward for his testimony save his necessary
-charges in attending thereabouts and ?faccneeth both parties litigant alike in respect
+charges in attending thereabouts and ?famoneth both parties litigant alike in respect
 of this cause And further cannot answere./
 }}

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 |Folio=443
 |Side=Recto
 |First transcriber=Emilie Farrimond
@@ Line 11: / Line 13: @@
 |Transcription image=[[File:IMG_0499.JPG|thumbnail|800px|none|HCA 13/70 f.443r: Right click on image for full size image in separate window]]
-|Transcription=The sixth of July 1655
+|Transcription=The sixth of July 1655/ &#91;CENTRE HEADING&#93;
-'''James Coweo''' of London Merchant agt the be sail the
+'''James Cowes''' of London Merchant against vessel the
 ''John and Elizabeth'' of which Edward Keene is master
-and against the saith '''Edward Kirevege surkley''' sinithe
+and against the saith '''Edward Keene Suckley''' Smith
-Examined upon an allegarou arlahe given in the
-sixth of May 1655 on the behalfe of the saith confe
-'''Thomas Burridge''' of the pifth of Shopey and county
+Examined upon an allegation arlate given in the
-Mitt Mariner aged fifteene yeares or thereabouts a wi hiet
+th of May 1655 on the behalfe of the sayd Counsell/
-sworne and examined saith and deposely at followeth vizt
-To the first arlche of the sayed allegation hee saith and deposely that in the yeare 1654
+'''Thomas Burridge''' of the parish of Stepney and County
-and noweth therein connurring the arlache '''Edward Keene''' not Master of the arlache
+Middlesex Mariner aged fifteene yeares or thereabouts a witnes
-Shipp the ''John & Elizabeth'' and tooke upon him the charge & government of Xer at
+sworne and examined saith and deposely at followeth videlicet./
-Master during the wXople voyage in question and was commonly iripuler to he then
-Master and commander of there fourth sayed voyage the premises hee deposely fourth hee
+To the first article of the sayed allegation hee saith and deposeth that in the yeare 1654
-this deponent was a cabbin boy and summoned to the saith master in the sayd shipp during the sayd
+and moneths therein ?connurring the arlate Edward Keene went Master of the arlate
-voyage and further to this arhe he cannot depose
+Shipp the ''John & Elizabeth'' and tooke upon him the charge & government of her as
 To the 6th hee saith that  hee this deponent being on board the vessel the ''John and Elizabeth''
-arlahe at St Lucair and rowing home to their port of London in her well followeth the sayd
+arlate at St Lucar and coming home to their port of London in her well knoweth the sayd
-vessel did at st Lucaic at foursayd take in deliver goods to be theine harboured to
+vessel did at St Lucar aforesayd take in divers goods to be thence transported to
-Londen and did accordingly bring there to London and further he cannot depo9se
+London and did accordingly bring there to London and further he cannot depose
-To the 7th and 8th arled thee sayd hee cannot depose
-To the 9th he saith hee preffered him selfe to the Rigishy of the Court arlahe
+To the 7th and 8th articles hee saith hee cannot depose/
 and further cannot depose
-To the last hee saith his forgiving deposition is same
+To the 9th he saith hee referred him selfe to the Registry of the Court arlate
-to the futerries
+to the Interrogatories &#91;CENTRE HEADING&#93;
-to the first jutrrie hee saith hee was required to appeare and hresrifie his knowledge
+to the first interrogatorie hee saith hee was required to appeare and testifie his knowledge
-in this cause by a person pages name hee knoweth not, with lohe this preudent that if
+in this cause by a person whose name hee knoweth not, who told this rendent that if
-hee would not ecaluitarily  appeare for to in hee could be followed or to that effort
+hee would not voluntarily appeare soe to doe hee should be compelled or to that effect
-and loce their deponent if thee appeared and hifitifiee therein could not looke her labouer but promised their
+and told this deponent if hee appeared and testified therein hee could not loose his labouer but promised this
-deponent nothing and saith it will bee noe benefit or damage to this deponent that hee knowtheth XXX which soreuer  of
+deponent nothing and saith it will bee noe benefitt or damage to this deponent that hee knoweth XXX which soe ever of
-the shee lihgaut perebaile in this raufe and saith hee is not any waier allyed or
+the parties litigant prevaile in this cause and saith hee is not any waies allyed or
-servant to the producent nor expertly any inrearde for his fishmoug save his ircessary
+servant to the producent nor expecteth any reward for his testimony save his necessary
-expriged in according thereabouts and followeth both phiea lihgaut alike in effort
+charges in attending thereabouts and ?faccneeth both parties litigant alike in respect
-of their cause and further cannot depose
+of this cause And further cannot answere./
 }}