HCA 13/71 f.203v Annotate - Revision history

ColinGreenstreet at 11:53, September 23, 2018

2018-09-23T11:53:17Z

ColinGreenstreet at 15:42, May 24, 2015

2015-05-24T15:42:54Z

ColinGreenstreet at 21:13, April 6, 2014

2014-04-06T21:13:09Z

ColinGreenstreet at 10:21, December 27, 2013

2013-12-27T10:21:22Z

ColinGreenstreet at 14:59, December 14, 2013

2013-12-14T14:59:20Z

ColinGreenstreet at 14:52, December 14, 2013

2013-12-14T14:52:42Z

ColinGreenstreet at 14:50, December 14, 2013

2013-12-14T14:50:45Z

ColinGreenstreet at 14:49, December 14, 2013

2013-12-14T14:49:47Z

ColinGreenstreet at 14:48, December 14, 2013

2013-12-14T14:48:46Z

ColinGreenstreet at 03:23, April 23, 2013

2013-04-23T03:23:40Z

@@ Line 52: / Line 52: @@
 perused the schedule in the sayd article mentioned hee saith by virtue
 of his oath that hee is persuaded in his conscience and verily beleeveth
-the same is all of it the sayd Trenchpaines owne hand writng And
+the same is all of it the sayd Trenchpaines owne hand writing And
 further to this article hee cannot depose./

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 |Folio=203
 |Side=Verso
-|Status=First cut transcription started and completed on 01/11/12 by Colin Greenstreet; edited on 14/12/13 by Colin Greenstreet
+|Status=Uploaded image; transcribed on 01/11/2012
-−
 |First transcriber=Colin Greenstreet
+|First transcribed=2012/11/01
-|First transcribed=12/11/01
+|Editorial history=Edited on 14/12/2013 by Colin Greenstreet
+|Note=IMAGE: P1130564.JPG
-|Editorial history=Created 05/04/13, by CSG
+}}
 {{PageHelp}}
 }}{{PageHelp}}
 {{PageTranscription
-|Transcription image=P1130564
+|Transcription image={{#transcription-image: P1130564.JPG}}
-−
 |Transcription=To the Interrogatories/ &#91;CENTRE HEADING&#93;
@@ Line 36: / Line 33: @@
 John Bennetland &#91;SIGNATURE, RH SIDE&#93;
-<nowiki>*****************************</nowiki>
+&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;
 The same day
@@ Line 87: / Line 84: @@
 Robert DeLuna &#91;SIGNATURE, RH SIDE&#93;
 |People=<u>Robert de Luna</u>
 |Primary sources='''TNA'''
@@ Line 108: / Line 103: @@
 PROB 11/390/105 Will of Robert De Luna, Merchant of Cheshunt, Hertfordshire. 31 January 1688
 PROB 11/420/29 Will of Elizabeth De Luna, Widow of Edmonton, Middlesex. 03 May 1694
 }}

@@ Line 109: / Line 109: @@
 PROB 11/420/29 Will of Elizabeth De Luna, Widow of Edmonton, Middlesex. 03 May 1694
-|Suggested links=[[PhD Forum|PhD Forum]]
+|Suggested links=[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AoNoOr05QRMtdHAyNmxuVnNmYkJ3Q0ZiNEQ0R0V2S3c#gid=0 HCA 13/71 Page Log & Planner]
-[[PhD Forum#head-94d5186ba3ec63d1ebcb1e902a2d13ac15f0c527|PhD Forum Themes]]
-−
-−
-−
 [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AoNoOr05QRMtdHAyNmxuVnNmYkJ3Q0ZiNEQ0R0V2S3c#gid=0 HCA 13/71 Page Log & Planner]
 [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AoNoOr05QRMtdFlXNjQ3ekM0WW5NS1oyN250QUpJd0E#gid=0 HCA 3/47 Page Log & Planner]
 }}
 ==Topics==

@@ Line 76: / Line 76: @@
 To the 5th hee saith hee hath heard that after the ladeing of the
-goods in question on board the Morlaix Merchant the Interrogate
+goods in question on board the ''Morlaix Merchant'' the Interrogate
 Trenchpaine fayled in his Estate And further to this Interrogatorie hee
 cannot depose./

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:59, December 14, 2013
Line 87:		Line 87:

	Robert DeLuna [SIGNATURE, RH SIDE]		Robert DeLuna [SIGNATURE, RH SIDE]
		+
		+	\|People=<u>Robert de Luna</u>
		+
		+	\|Primary sources='''TNA'''
		+
		+	<u>Chancery</u>
		+
		+	C 5/111/24 Short title: Hicks v Bullock. Plaintiffs: Francis Hicks. Defendants: Robert Bullock, and others. Subject: personal estate of the deceased Robert De Luna, London. Document type: bill, two answers. 1694
		+	C 5/525/20 Short title: Molyne v De Luna. Plaintiffs: Abraham Molyne. Defendants: Robert de Luna and Elizabeth de Luna his wife. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: Bill, two answers. 1673
		+
		+	C 6/129/239 Short title: Winstanley v Burrell. Plaintiffs: Edward Winstanley. Defendants: Samuel Burrell, John Limbrey, Richard Love, Robert Deluna and Elizabeth Deluna his wife. Subject: property in Wisbech, Cambridgeshire. Document type: three answers, schedule.
		+
		+	C 10/494/85 De Luna v. Lamplugh: Middx. 1676
		+
		+	C 22/724/35 Wingfeild v. De Luna. 01 January 1558 - 31 December 1714
		+
		+
		+	<u>PROB</u>
		+
		+	PROB 11/390/105 Will of Robert De Luna, Merchant of Cheshunt, Hertfordshire. 31 January 1688
		+	PROB 11/420/29 Will of Elizabeth De Luna, Widow of Edmonton, Middlesex. 03 May 1694

	\|Suggested links=[[PhD Forum\|PhD Forum]]		\|Suggested links=[[PhD Forum\|PhD Forum]]

@@ Line 49: / Line 49: @@
 To the 6th article of the sayd allegation and the schedule therein mentioned
-hee saith hee hath knowne the arlate Trenchpaine for X about these
+hee saith hee hath knowne the arlate Trenchpaine for about these
-fowerteene yeares last past ˹and˺ hath receaved divers letters letters from
+fowerteene yeares last past and hath receaved divers letters letters from
 him and had correspondence with him in way of merchandizing and
 thereby is well acquainted with his hand writeing, and having

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 To the last soe farr as to these words (or did use words to that or the like
 effect) hee cannot answere and knoweth nothing thereof And to the rest
-of the Interrogatorie hee cannot answereth negatively./
+of the Interrogatorie hee answereth negatively./
 John Bennetland &#91;SIGNATURE, RH SIDE&#93;

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 |Folio=203
 |Side=Verso
-|Status=First cut transcription started and completed on 01/11/12 by Colin Greenstreet
+|Status=First cut transcription started and completed on 01/11/12 by Colin Greenstreet; edited on14/12/13 by Colin Greenstreet
 |First transcriber=Colin Greenstreet
@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 |Transcription image=P1130564
-|Transcription=<document-start>
+|Transcription=To the Interrogatories/ &#91;CENTRE HEADING&#93;
-. To the Interrogatories/
-. To the first hee saith hee cometh to testifie the truth of his knowledge in
+To the first hee saith hee cometh to testifie the truth of his knowledge in
-. the cause on behalfe of the producent being required soe to doe by the foresayd
+the cause on behalfe of the producent being required soe to doe by the foresayd
-. Captaine Bowden and hath receaved nothing for his paines nor is concerned
+Captaine Bowden and hath receaved nothing for his paines nor is concerned
-. in the linnens in question And otherwise negatively/
+in the linnens in question And otherwise negatively/
-. To the 2 hee cannot depose/
-. To the 3 saving his foregoeing deposition hee cannot answere/
+To the 2 hee cannot depose/
-. To the 4th hee cannot depose./
-. To the 5th hee cannot depose/
+To the 3 saving his foregoeing deposition hee cannot answere/
-. To the last soe farr as to these words (or did use words to that or the like
-. effect) hee cannot answere and knoweth nothing thereof And to the rest
+To the 4th hee cannot depose./
-. of the Interrogatorie hee cannot answereth negatively./
-. John Bennetland SIGNATURE, RH SIDE
+To the 5th hee cannot depose/
-.
-. The same day
+To the last soe farr as to these words (or did use words to that or the like
-. Examined on the sayd allegation
+effect) hee cannot answere and knoweth nothing thereof And to the rest
-. <margin value="Left">Rp. 4</margin>
+of the Interrogatorie hee cannot answereth negatively./
-. '''Robert de Luna''' of London Merchant aged 32 yeares
-. or thereabouts a wittnes sworne and examined saith and
+John Bennetland &#91;SIGNATURE, RH SIDE&#93;
-. deposeth as followeth videlicet./
-. To the 6th article of the sayd allegation and the schedule therein mentioned
+<nowiki>*****************************</nowiki>
-. hee saith hee hath knowne the arlate Trenchpaine for X about these
-. fowerteene yeares last past ˹and˺ hath receaved divers letters letters from
+The same day
-. him and had correspondence with him in way of merchandizing and
-. thereby is well acquainted with his hand writeing, and having
+Examined on the sayd allegation
-. perused the schedule in the sayd article mentioned hee saith by virtue
-. of his oath that hee is persuaded in his conscience and verily beleeveth
+'''Rp. 4'''
-. the same is all of it the sayd Trenchpaines owne hand writng And
-. further to this article hee cannot depose./
+'''Robert de Luna''' of London Merchant aged 32 yeares
-. To the rest hee is not examined by direction of the producents
+or thereabouts a wittnes sworne and examined saith and
-. proctor
+deposeth as followeth videlicet./
-.
-. To the Interrogatories./
+To the 6th article of the sayd allegation and the schedule therein mentioned
-. To the first Interrogatorie hee saith hee cometh to testifie the
+hee saith hee hath knowne the arlate Trenchpaine for X about these
-. truth of his knowledge being required soe to doe (as hee remembreth
+fowerteene yeares last past ˹and˺ hath receaved divers letters letters from
-. by one Mr Thomas Papillion a merchant on behalfe of the producent
+him and had correspondence with him in way of merchandizing and
-. and hath receaved nothing for his testimony nor expecteth any thing, nor
+thereby is well acquainted with his hand writeing, and having
-. is concerned in the linnens in question And otherwise negatively
+perused the schedule in the sayd article mentioned hee saith by virtue
-. To the 2 hee cannot depose./
+of his oath that hee is persuaded in his conscience and verily beleeveth
-. To the 3 hee cannot depose/
+the same is all of it the sayd Trenchpaines owne hand writng And
-. To the 4th hee cannot depose/
+further to this article hee cannot depose./
-. To the 5th hee saith hee hath heard that after the ladeing of the
-. goods in question on board the Morlaix Merchant the Interrogate
+To the rest hee is not examined by direction of the producents
-. Trenchpaine fayled in his Estate And further to this Interrogatorie hee
+proctor
-. cannot depose./
-. To the last soe farr as to these words (or did use words to that or the like effect)
+To the Interrogatories./ &#91;CENTRE HEADING&#93;
-. hee cannot depose knowing nothing thereof And to the rest of the Interrogatorie hee
-. answereth negatively./
+To the first Interrogatorie hee saith hee cometh to testifie the
-. <margin value="Left">Repeated in Court before both Judges./</margin>
+truth of his knowledge being required soe to doe (as hee remembreth
-. Robert DeLuna SIGNATURE, RH SIDE
+by one Mr Thomas Papillion a merchant on behalfe of the producent
-</document-end>
+and hath receaved nothing for his testimony nor expecteth any thing, nor
 |Suggested links=[[PhD Forum|PhD Forum]]