HCA 13/71 f.52r Annotate - Revision history

ColinGreenstreet at 17:48, May 23, 2016

2016-05-23T17:48:57Z

ColinGreenstreet at 07:59, May 25, 2015

2015-05-25T07:59:29Z

ColinGreenstreet at 15:59, December 15, 2013

2013-12-15T15:59:46Z

ColinGreenstreet at 12:43, September 13, 2013

2013-09-13T12:43:43Z

New page

{{PageMetaData
|Parent volume=HCA 13/71
|Folio=52
|Side=Recto
|Status=First cut transcription completed by Colin Greenstreet on 03/10/12; edited on 15/12/12 by Colin Greenstreet; edited on 13/09/13 by Colin Greenstreet

|First transcriber=Colin Greenstreet

|First transcribed=12/10/03

|Editorial history=Created 13/09/13, by CSG

}}{{PageHelp}}
{{PageTranscription
|Transcription image=P1130305

|Transcription=The 8th of February 1655.

The claim of ffrancis Lauson)
for his goods in the ''hare in the)
feild''.)

Exámined upon the allegation given on the
behalfe of the said Lauson the
25 of July 1655.

'''Rp .1.'''

'''Manoel Martinis Dormido''', of London Merchant
aged 55 yeares or thereabouts sworne and exámined.

To the seaventh article of the said allegation (upon which alone hee is
by direction of the producent examined) hee saith and deposeth that
in the hee very well knoweth the producent ffrancis Lauson and
hath soe donne for theise sixteene yeeres last or thereabouts, and
saith that the said ffrancis is a Native of Amsterdam and sonne of
Julian Lauson a burger of Amsterdam, and was and is a subiect
of the Lords the States of the United Netherlands and for such commonly
accompted and reputed, and for the most part of the said space
hath dwelt in and bin an Inhabitant of Amsterdam with his said father.
The premisses hee deposeth to and knoweth to be true because
hee this deponent for fourteene or fifteene yeeres (ended about
August last was twelvemoneth, at which time hee came to dwell here
in London,) lived in Amsterdam, and there had commerce and
frequent conversation with the said Julian Lauson the father and alsoe
much acquaintance and conversation with the said producent sonne of the
said Julian. And for an Inhabitant of Amsterdam and subiect of
the said Lords the States, hee the said ffrancis Lauson was and
is commonly accompted and reputed. And otherwise hee cannot depose
saving the said ffrancis about two yeeres since made a voyage into Spaine as a factor
and to doe his owne marchandize.

To the Interrogatories [CENTRE HEADING]

To the first hee saith hee is a Native of Antiquera in
Spaine, and otherwise negatively saving his foregoing deposition to which
hee referreth himselfe

To the second hee saith the said franses Lauson is a batchelour, and since
noe housekeeper, using to live in Amsterdam with his said father.

To the third and fourth hee cannot depose saving as aforesaid
for hee was not in the voyage nor knoweth ought thereof or of the
lading in question.

To the fifth hee hath not so deposed.

To the 6th hee cannot depose not being in the voyage nor knowing
ought of the bill interrogated.

To the 7 hee cannot depose.

To the 8th hee hath not soe deposed.

To the 9th hee saith that hee beleeveth verily that the goods claimed in
this cause by the said ffrancis Lauson doe really belong unto him and
not unto any other person whatsoever.

To the 10th negatively for his part and otherwise cannot answer.

To the 11th hee cannot answer.

To the 12th hee saith hee doth not knowe any one called Peter

da [XX]ay. And otherwise hee cannot answer

Repeated before Collonel Cork

Manuel Mnez Domedos [SIGNATURE, RH SIDE]

|Suggested links=[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AoNoOr05QRMtdHAyNmxuVnNmYkJ3Q0ZiNEQ0R0V2S3c#gid=0 HCA 13/71 Page Log & Planner]
[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AoNoOr05QRMtdFlXNjQ3ekM0WW5NS1oyN250QUpJd0E#gid=0 HCA 3/47 Page Log & Planner]

}}

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 |First transcriber=Colin Greenstreet
 |First transcribed=2012/10/03
-|Editorial history=Edited on 15/12/2012 and on 13/09/2013 by Colin Greenstreet
+|Editorial history=Edited on 15/12/2012, on 13/09/2013 and on 23/05/2016 by Colin Greenstreet
 |Note=IMAGE: P1130305.JPG
 }}
@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 |Transcription=The 8th of February 1655.
-The claim of ffrancis Lauson&#125;
+The claim of ffrancis Lanson&#125;
 for his goods in the ''hare in the''&#125;
 ''feild''.&#125;
@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 To the seaventh article of the said allegation (upon which alone hee is
 by direction of the producent examined) hee saith and deposeth that
-in the hee very well knoweth the producent ffrancis Lauson and
+in the hee very well knoweth the producent ffrancis Lanson and
 hath soe donne for theise sixteene yeeres last or thereabouts, and
 saith that the said ffrancis is a Native of Amsterdam and sonne of
-Julian Lauson a burger of Amsterdam, and was and is a subiect
+Julian Lanson a burger of Amsterdam, and was and is a subiect
 of the Lords the States of the United Netherlands and for such commonly
 accompted and reputed, and for the most part of the said space
@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
 August last was twelvemoneth, at which time hee came to dwell here
 in London,) lived in Amsterdam, and there had commerce and
-frequent conversation with the said Julian Lauson the father and alsoe
+frequent conversation with the said Julian Lanson the father and alsoe
 much acquaintance and conversation with the said producent sonne of the
 said Julian. And for an Inhabitant of Amsterdam and subiect of
-the said Lords the States, hee the said ffrancis Lauson was and
+the said Lords the States, hee the said ffrancis Lanson was and
 is commonly accompted and reputed. And otherwise hee cannot depose
 saving the said ffrancis about two yeeres since made a voyage into Spaine as a factor
@@ Line 54: / Line 54: @@
 hee referreth himselfe
-To the second hee saith the said franses Lauson is a batchelour, and since
+To the second hee saith the said franses Lanson is a batchelour, and since
 noe housekeeper, using to live in Amsterdam with his said father.
@@ Line 71: / Line 71: @@
 To the 9th hee saith that hee beleeveth verily that the goods claimed in
-this cause by the said ffrancis Lauson doe really belong unto him and
+this cause by the said ffrancis Lanson doe really belong unto him and
 not unto any other person whatsoever.
@@ Line 80: / Line 80: @@
 To the 12th hee saith hee doth not knowe any one called Peter
-da &#91;XX&#93;ay. And otherwise hee cannot answer
+de &#91;?Gray&#93;. And otherwise hee cannot answer
 Repeated before Collonel Cork

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 |Folio=52
 |Side=Recto
-|Status=First cut transcription completed by Colin Greenstreet on 03/10/12; edited on 15/12/12 by Colin Greenstreet; edited on 13/09/13 by Colin Greenstreet
+|Status=Uploaded image; transcribed on 03/10/2012
-−
 |First transcriber=Colin Greenstreet
+|First transcribed=2012/10/03
-|First transcribed=12/10/03
+|Editorial history=Edited on 15/12/2012 and on 13/09/2013 by Colin Greenstreet
+|Note=IMAGE: P1130305.JPG
-|Editorial history=Created 13/09/13, by CSG
+}}
 {{PageHelp}}
 }}{{PageHelp}}
 {{PageTranscription
-|Transcription image=P1130305
+|Transcription image={{#transcription-image: P1130305.JPG}}
-−
 |Transcription=The 8th of February 1655.
@@ Line 88: / Line 85: @@
 Manuel Mnez Domedos &#91;SIGNATURE, RH SIDE&#93;
 }}

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 |Transcription=The 8th of February 1655.
-The claim of ffrancis Lauson)
+The claim of ffrancis Lauson&#125;
-for his goods in the ''hare in the)
+for his goods in the ''hare in the''&#125;
-feild''.)
+''feild''.&#125;
 Exámined upon the allegation given on the