HCA 13/73 f.568v Annotate - Revision history

ColinGreenstreet at 16:14, May 26, 2015

2015-05-26T16:14:01Z

ColinGreenstreet at 16:52, November 1, 2014

2014-11-01T16:52:41Z

Karengunnell at 13:40, September 8, 2014

2014-09-08T13:40:33Z

Karengunnell at 13:23, September 8, 2014

2014-09-08T13:23:57Z

Karengunnell at 13:01, September 8, 2014

2014-09-08T13:01:45Z

Karengunnell at 23:41, September 7, 2014

2014-09-07T23:41:13Z

Karengunnell at 23:39, September 7, 2014

2014-09-07T23:39:43Z

ColinGreenstreet at 09:28, August 3, 2014

2014-08-03T09:28:07Z

ColinGreenstreet at 09:22, August 3, 2014

2014-08-03T09:22:14Z

New page

{{PageMetaData
|Parent volume=HCA 13/73
|Folio=568
|Side=Verso
|Editorial history=Created 20/06/14, by CSG

}}{{PageHelp}}
{{PageTranscription
|Transcription image=[[File:IMG_0351.JPG|thumbnail|800px|none|HCA 13/73 f.568r: Right click on image for full size image in separate window]]

}}

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 |Folio=568
 |Side=Verso
-|First transcriber=K. Gunnell
+|Status=Uploaded image; transcribed
+|First transcriber=Karen Gunnell
-|Editorial history=Created 20/06/14, by CSG
+|Note=IMAGE: IMG_0352_copy.JPG
 }}
-}}{{PageHelp}}
+{{PageHelp}}
 {{PageTranscription
-|Transcription image=[[File:IMG_0352_copy.JPG|thumbnail|800px|none|HCA 13/73 f.568v: Right click on image for full size image in separate window]]
+|Transcription image={{#transcription-image: IMG_0352_copy.JPG}}
-−
 |Transcription='''R   5'''
@@ Line 18: / Line 17: @@
 '''Reneatus Enys''' of the City of London Merchant aged 31 years or
-thereabouts witness in this part witness and deposes as follows:
+thereabouts witness in this part witness and deposes as follows&#58;
 To the first second and third articles of the said allegations
@@ Line 58: / Line 57: @@
 Renatus Enys &#91;SIGNATURE, RH SIDE&#93;
-<nowiki>***************************</nowiki>
+&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;
 The second day of October 1660
@@ Line 81: / Line 80: @@
 silks, Mohaire, grograim, grogram yarn, Linnen, Turkey
 carpetts, damaske, iro and may other goods each
+|Secondary sources=Calendar of State Papers relating to English Affairs in the Archives of Venice
 }}
 ==Miscellaneous Topics==
@@ Line 101: / Line 100: @@
 ----

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 |Transcription image=[[File:IMG_0352_copy.JPG|thumbnail|800px|none|HCA 13/73 f.568v: Right click on image for full size image in separate window]]
-|Transcription=R   5 (LEFT H side)
+|Transcription='''R   5'''
 The same day
 on the said allegation
 Reneatus Enys of the City of London Merchant aged 31 years or
 thereabouts witness in this part witness and deposes as follows:
 To the first second and third articles of the said allegations
 he says and deposes that the producent Arthur Spry (whom hee saith he hath
@@ Line 39: / Line 43: @@
 company, and further hee cannot depose.
 He says that his previous deposition is true
-To the Interriee
 To the first negative
 To the second that that hee the time aforesaid heard the said Mr
 Alford severall times say that he had made a bill of sale of the said
@@ Line 46: / Line 53: @@
 And otherwise he does not know saving his previous deposition to which he refers.
 Further he does not know saving his previous deposition.
-(signed)  Renatus Enys
 Repeated with..........
-The aforesaid Angell (LEFT H MARGIN)
-R 2 (LEFT H MARGIN)
+Renatus Enys &#91;SIGNATURE, RH SIDE&#93;
 The second day of October 1660
 Guiliemus Rand of Milton close (to) (?Grevesend GUTTER)
 in the county of Kent sailor aged 41 years
 or  thereabouts sworne and examined says
 and deposes (prXXX?) assigned./
 To the first and second articles of the articles given in this said cause from Jonathan
 Keate soldier and (?XX) he says and deposes that some time after the arlate

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:40, September 8, 2014
Line 67:		Line 67:

	}}		}}
		+	----
		+	==Miscellaneous Topics==
		+
		+	From: Calendar of State Paper relating to English affairs in the Archives of Venice.
		+	British History on Line.
		+	257. I have read the evidence taken in the Admiralty Court on the part of Sir Jonathan Keat and Co. owners of the ship Angelo and find it sufficiently proved:
		+	(1). That Keat and Co. were the true owners of the said ship in 1657 and 1658, William Rand being master and Daniel Elwood purser, and they sent the ship on a voyage to Smyrna, where they took divers passengers, some being Turks, with divers goods to be taken thence to Tunis and Leghorn, and were to receive 2630 pieces of 8 reals for the passengers and 6190 for the goods on arrival at Tunis or Leghorn, for the benefit of the Co.
		+	(2). The master and purser when at Smyrna lent 9800 thalers by way of maritime exchange, of the Company's money to some of their passengers, and were to receive 11,342 thalers or pieces of 8 on consigning the goods at Tunis and Leghorn.
		+	(3). A short time after the ship, when sailing peacefully, was furiously attacked by 5 Venetian ships of war commanded by Sig. Antonio Peruglia, vice admiral of the fleet, on the 16th April 1658, when 7 or 8 of the passengers were slain, many of the ship's company wounded and 600 men boarded, stripping the sailors and passengers and dividing the goods among them.
		+	(4). Although the master complained to the vice admiral and after to the general, showing to whom the goods belonged, the hire due to the owners and how the merchandise was pledged for the money lent to the passengers he could never obtain satisfaction, and in a suit only the ship was adjudged to him for the satisfaction of the owners. So it is clear that the Venetians treated the passengers unjustly; but the master did his duty to prevent their loss, which cannot be imputed to him.
		+	Sir J. Keat and Co. were more particularly injured as the Venetians maltreated the crew, deprived them of the hire for passengers and goods as well as of their money advanced on loan.
		+	(1). By the law and custom of the Mediterranean and Levant sea if the goods of enemies are taken in the ships of friends the master of the ship taken shall receive his full hire as if the ship unladed at its destination. In time past an English ship with Turks on board, who owed for their transport, being taken by a warship of the Grand Duke of Florence, Alberico Gentile, a famous Italian lawyer pronounced that the English should receive the full amount for transporting the Turks.
		+	(2). As regards the loss of Keat & Co. on account of the goods taken which were pledged for the loan, admitting that the passengers were Turks or enemies of the Venetians, the latter could not acquire a better right to them than belonged to the passengers themselves, and the plundering could not wipe out the just claims of the English.
		+	I am therefore of opinion that for the satisfaction of Keat & Co. his Majesty may inform the Agent of Venice that he is informed of the violence shown by Venetian forces against the ship Angelo and that he looks for satisfaction in some reasonable time, failing which he will be obliged to grant his subjects such means for recouping themselves as are permitted by the law of nations.
		+	Richard Zouch.
		+	[Italian; from the English.]
		+
		+	----
		+	==Additional Sources==
		+
		+	Calendar of State Papers relating to English Affairs in the Archives of Venice
		+	British History on Line.

@@ Line 59: / Line 59: @@
 ship the Angell whereof this deponent was in was seized by a
 squadron of ship in the Service of the Duke of (?XXX GUTTER) (insert not legible)
-Antonio Peruglia the then Vice Admiral of the (?XXXX GUTTER)
+Antonio Peruglia the then Vice Admiral of the Venetian
 Fleete did take and cause to be taken, and suffered his
 Officers and company to take out of the said ship the Angell

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 |Transcription image=[[File:IMG_0352_copy.JPG|thumbnail|800px|none|HCA 13/73 f.568v: Right click on image for full size image in separate window]]
-|Transcription=R   5 (LH side)
+|Transcription=R   5 (LEFT H side)
 The same day
 on the said allegation
-Rene Enys of the City of London Merchant aged 31 years or
+Reneatus Enys of the City of London Merchant aged 31 years or
 thereabouts witness in this part witness and deposes as follows:
 To the first second and third articles of the said allegations
@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 company, and further hee cannot depose.
 He says that his previous deposition is true
-To the examinee
+To the Interriee
 To the first negative
 To the second that that hee the time aforesaid heard the said Mr
 Alford severall times say that he had made a bill of sale of the said
 ship to the said Arthur Spry and company
-to do ........
+And otherwise he does not know saving his previous deposition to which he refers.
 }}