HCA 13/73 f.70v Annotate - Revision history

ColinGreenstreet at 09:55, July 2, 2018

2018-07-02T09:55:42Z

ColinGreenstreet at 09:47, May 18, 2015

2015-05-18T09:47:43Z

ColinGreenstreet at 17:00, August 19, 2013

2013-08-19T17:00:49Z

ColinGreenstreet at 22:41, August 18, 2013

2013-08-18T22:41:04Z

New page

{{PageMetaData
|Parent volume=HCA 13/73
|Folio=70
|Side=Verso
|Status=First cut transcription started and completed on 11/08/13 by Colin Greenstreet

|First transcriber=Colin Greenstreet

|First transcribed=13 /08/11

|Editorial history=Created 11/08/13, by CSG

}}{{PageHelp}}
{{PageTranscription
|Transcription image=P1110338

|Transcription=the ''Jonathan'' as aforesaid that ?then was bound for Bantam ?told
them plainly that they might XX XX should for in thither XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX And XXXX
to come to an anchor XXX the Admirall , his precontest being XXXX
wXXX aboard the dutch Admirall, and upon his retourme aboard the
Jonathan declared the XXX Admirall, and expressly forbidden and
?prohibited their going in to Bantam, and had declared that if they and XXXXXX to goe in
hee would sink them in ?that effort, and thereupon the said Mr Dacres being
supra cargo or merchant of the Jonathan under a protest against such their
hinderance by the dutch. All w:ch hee knoweth being present aboard
the ''Jonathan''. And further deposeth not.

?9:th article of the said allegation hee saith and deposeth that
the said shipp the ''Jonathan'' being XX prohibited and hindered by the dutch
from going into Bantam to which hee was XX XXXX with her said XXXX
was XXX and to depose and goe to other places for w:ch ?ther goods
were not proper and to w:ch they were not designed, and there to barter
and XXXX them away, to the great losse and damage of the said
imployers in respect of what the ?prisses would have bin if thesaid goods
hath nin XXX to an delivered at Bantam accordinge as they were designed

To the tenth hee saith that by the said hindrance and prohibition of the
dutch the said Imployers have suffered greate losse and dammage, but
the valew thereof hee cannot as hee saith estimate

Repeated with his precontest before
Dr Godolphin.

W: M: Stephens [SIGNATURE, RH SIDE]

<nowiki>**********************************************************</nowiki>

The 17th of ffebruray 1658

Examined upon the fore said allegation

'''3.'''

'''Alexander Prescott''' of London Marchant aged 27 yeeres or
thereabouts sworne and examined.

To the first and second articles hee saith and deposeth That hee very well
knoweth the procudents Maurice Thompsom, Thomas Canham, Christofer
Willoughby, John Page and company aclate and saith they were in and for
all the monthes arlate of the yeere 1656 XXXXX and Imployers of the
shipp the ''Jonathan'' arlate (Robert GXXXXX commander) as a trading or merchandizing voyage from England to the parts of East India in XXXXX was XX retourne for England for their use and accompt, and saith that in
January XXX was ?two ?yeers the said shipp being quietly trading in the said
parts, and having aboard her a quantitie of marchandizes consisting in XX
cottons and callicos XX XXX XXX factor XXX account taken aboard her on the coast
of Cormandel was carrying XX XXX for Bantam for w:ch place the said goods were
XXXX and were provided XXXXX to be ther XXXXXX and XXXXXXX
and not for XXXXX to be disbursed XX XXX XXXXXX nir XXX XXXX XX
XXX XX XXXX soe XXXXX to her said ?merchants as XX Bantam, which hee
knoweth being burser of the said shipp and goeing the said voyage from place to
place in her, being alsoe XXXX X XXX XXX XXX XXXX of the, XX XXX

To the third and fourth articles hee saidth and deposeth that the said shipp XXXXX
XX XX her course from the said coast for Bantam and XX XXXXX Island
of Pulliaayanjan about XXX XX XXX leagues distance from Bantam XXX
XXXX XXX XXXX of dutch shipps (w:ch wer in the service and Imployment
of the dutch East India company) XXX, saving that one of them XX
them XXXX, and XXX XXXX XXX along with XXX XXXXX, and saith XXXX
XXXX

}}

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 |Status=Uploaded image; transcribed on 11/08/2013
 |First transcriber=Colin Greenstreet
-|First transcribed=13 /08/11
+|First transcribed=2013/08/11
 |Note=IMAGE: P1110338.JPG
 }}
@@ Line 11: / Line 12: @@
 {{PageTranscription
 |Transcription image={{#transcription-image: P1110338.JPG}}
-|Transcription=the ''Jonathan'' as aforesaid that ?then was bound for Bantam ?told
+|Transcription=the ''Jonathan'' as aforesaid that shee was bound for Bantam, told
-them plainly that they might XX XX should for in thither XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX And XXXX
+them plainly that they might not nor should goe in thither and taht they (speaking of teh said &#91;?XXXX&#93;) lay there purposely to keep them out And
-to come to an anchor XXX the Admirall , his precontest being XXXX
+to come to an anchor neere the Admirall, his precontest henry dacres
-wXXX aboard the dutch Admirall, and upon his retourme aboard the
+went aboard the dutch Admirall, and upon his retourne aboard the
-Jonathan declared the XXX Admirall, and expressly forbidden and
+''Jonathan'' declared that the dutch Admirall had expressly forbidden and
-?prohibited their going in to Bantam, and had declared that if they and XXXXXX to goe in
+prohibited their going in to Bantam, and had declared that if they endeavoured to goe in
-hee would sink them in ?that effort, and thereupon the said Mr Dacres being
+hee would sink them or to that effort, and thereupon the said Mr Dacres being
-supra cargo or merchant of the Jonathan under a protest against such their
+sopra cargo or merchant of the ''Jonathan'' made a protest against such their
-hinderance by the dutch. All w&#58;ch hee knoweth being present aboard
+hinderance by the dutch. All which hee knoweth being present aboard
 the ''Jonathan''. And further deposeth not.
-?9&#58;th article of the said allegation hee saith and deposeth that
+To the 9&#58;th article of the said allegation hee saith and deposeth that
-the said shipp the ''Jonathan'' being XX prohibited and hindered by the dutch
+the said shipp the ''Jonathan'' being soe prohibited and hindered by the dutch
-from going into Bantam to which hee was XX XXXX with her said XXXX
+from going into Bantam to which shee was designed with her said lading
-was XXX and to depose and goe to other places for w&#58;ch ?ther goods
+was constrained to depart and goe to other places for which her goods
-were not proper and to w&#58;ch they were not designed, and there to barter
+were not proper and to which they were not designed, and there to barter
-and XXXX them away, to the great losse and damage of the said
+and truck them away, to the great losse and damage of the said
-imployers in respect of what the ?prisses would have bin if thesaid goods
+imployers in respect of what the proffit would have bin if the said goods
-hath nin XXX to an delivered at Bantam accordinge as they were designed
+hath bin &#91;?carried&#93; to and delivered at Bantam according as they were designed
 To the tenth hee saith that by the said hindrance and prohibition of the
@@ Line 36: / Line 37: @@
 Repeated with his precontest before
-Dr Godolphin.
+Doctor Godolphin.
-W&#58; M&#58; Stephens  &#91;SIGNATURE, RH SIDE&#93;
+Wm&#58; Stephens  &#91;SIGNATURE, RH SIDE&#93;
 &#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;
@@ Line 44: / Line 45: @@
 The 17th of ffebruray 1658
-Examined upon the fore said allegation
+Examined upon the foresaid allegation
 '''3.'''
@@ Line 52: / Line 53: @@
 To the first and second articles hee saith and deposeth That hee very well
-knoweth the procudents Maurice Thompsom, Thomas Canham, Christofer
+knoweth the producents Maurice Thompsom, Thomas Canham, Christofer
 Willoughby, John Page and company aclate and saith they were in and for
 all the monthes arlate of the yeere 1656 XXXXX and Imployers of the
-shipp the ''Jonathan'' arlate (Robert GXXXXX commander) as a trading or merchandizing voyage from England to the parts of East India in XXXXX was XX retourne for England for their use and accompt, and saith that in
+shipp the ''Jonathan'' arlate (Robert &#91;?Groves&#93; commander) as a trading or
-January XXX was ?two ?yeers the said shipp being quietly trading in the said
+merchandizing voyage from England to the parts of East India whence shee
-parts, and having aboard her a quantitie of marchandizes consisting in XX
+was to retourne for England for their use and accompt, and saith that in
-cottons and callicos XX XXX XXX factor XXX account taken aboard her on the coast
+January last was two yeares the said shipp being quietly trading in the said
-of Cormandel was carrying XX XXX for Bantam for w&#58;ch place the said goods were
+parts, and having aboard her a quantitie of marchandizes consisting in &#91;?XXX&#93;
-XXXX and were provided XXXXX to be ther XXXXXX and XXXXXXX
+cottons and callicos which were for the said account taken aboard her on the coast
-and not for XXXXX to be disbursed XX XXX XXXXXX nir XXX XXXX XX
+of Cormandel was carrying the same for Bantam for which place the said goods were
-XXX XX XXXX soe XXXXX to her said ?merchants as XX Bantam, which hee
+proper and were provided purposely to be there vended and disposed of
-knoweth being burser of the said shipp and goeing the said voyage from place to
+and not &#91;?soe&#93; &#91;?proper&#93; to be disposed or at any other place, nor would &#91;?XXXXX&#93; in
-place in her, being alsoe XXXX X XXX XXX XXX XXXX of the, XX XXX
+those parts yeeld soe much proffitt to her said merchants as at Bantam, which hee
-To the third and fourth articles hee saidth and deposeth that the said shipp XXXXX
+To the third and fourth articles hee saith and deposeth that the said shipp being
-XX XX her course from the said coast for Bantam and XX XXXXX Island
+soe in her course from the said coast for Bantam and comming neere the Island
-of Pulliaayanjan about XXX XX XXX leagues distance from Bantam XXX
+of Pullipanjan about foure or five leagues distance from Bantam Road
-XXXX XXX XXXX of dutch shipps (w&#58;ch wer in the service and Imployment
+found five saile of dutch shipps (which were in the service and Imployment
-of the dutch East India company) XXX, saving that one of them XX
+of the dutch East India company) lying there, saving that one of them &#91;?XXXX&#93;
-them XXXX, and XXX XXXX XXX along with XXX XXXXX, and saith XXXX
+them &#91;?XXXX&#93;, and came some way along with the ''Jonathan'', and saith &#91;?XXXX&#93;
-XXXX
+&#91;?XXXX&#93;
 }}

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:00, August 19, 2013
(No difference)