HCA 13/73 f.75r Annotate - Revision history

ColinGreenstreet at 10:53, May 18, 2015

2015-05-18T10:53:52Z

2014-10-23T09:37:32Z

2014-10-23T09:36:44Z

2014-10-23T09:36:17Z

2014-04-18T14:22:01Z

2013-10-03T20:11:08Z

2013-10-03T20:08:27Z

2013-10-03T20:05:49Z

2013-10-03T20:03:16Z

2013-08-22T15:54:03Z

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 |Folio=75
 |Side=Recto
-|Status=First cut transcription started and completed on 19/08/13 by Colin Greenstreet; edited on 23/10/14 by Colin Greenstreet
+|Status=Uploaded image; transcribed on 19/08/2013
-−
 |First transcriber=Colin Greenstreet
+|First transcribed=2013/08/19
-|First transcribed=13/08/19
+|Editorial history=Edited on 23/10/2014 by Colin Greenstreet
+|Note=IMAGE: P1110995.JPG
-|Editorial history=Created 19/08/13, by CSG
+}}
 {{PageHelp}}
 }}{{PageHelp}}
 {{PageTranscription
-|Transcription image=P1110995
+|Transcription image={{#transcription-image: P1110995.JPG}}
-−
 |Transcription=The 28th of ffebruary 1658 English style//
@@ Line 79: / Line 76: @@
 therein) to which hee presently ?here cannot more
 particularly answer to this Interrogatorie./
 |Primary sources=<u>TNA</u>
@@ Line 90: / Line 86: @@
 PROB 11/353/102 Will of Christopher Tiddeman of Rotherhithe, Surrey. 28 January 1677
 - NOTE Redriff = Rotherhithe
 }}

@@ Line 67: / Line 67: @@
 of the Interrogatories hee answereth negatively./
-To the 2 Interrogatorie hee saith , hee knew both the shipps the ''Consent'' and ''Phenix''
+To the 2 Interrogatorie hee saith, hee knew both the shipps the ''Consent'' and ''Phenix''
 Interrate, the ''Consent'' for these tenn or twelve yeares last past and the
 ''Phenix'' from the lyeing when the dammage in question happened which

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 |Transcription=The 28th of ffebruary 1658 English style//
-XXX and others against Church)
+Swyre and others against Church)
 Budd Smith)
-Examined on an allegation on behalfe of the sayd Surpre and
+Examined on an allegation on behalfe of the sayd Swyre and
 others

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 |Folio=75
 |Side=Recto
-|Status=First cut transcription started and completed on 19/08/13 by Colin Greenstreet
+|Status=First cut transcription started and completed on 19/08/13 by Colin Greenstreet; edited on 23/10/14 by Colin Greenstreet
 |First transcriber=Colin Greenstreet

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 }}{{PageHelp}}
 {{PageTranscription
-|Transcription image=P1110993
+|Transcription image=P1110995
 |Transcription=The 28th of ffebruary 1658 English style//

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:11, October 3, 2013
Line 85:		Line 85:

	ADM 106/332/59 William Castle, Shipbuilder. Response to the Surveyor's request for tender rebuilding the James. Gives his price based on the fact that the scantlings are the same as proposed for 3rd Rates with rebates for using existing materials. 1678 Jan 16		ADM 106/332/59 William Castle, Shipbuilder. Response to the Surveyor's request for tender rebuilding the James. Gives his price based on the fact that the scantlings are the same as proposed for 3rd Rates with rebates for using existing materials. 1678 Jan 16
		+
		+	'''PROB'''
		+
		+	PROB 11/353/102 Will of Christopher Tiddeman of Rotherhithe, Surrey. 28 January 1677
		+	- NOTE Redriff = Rotherhithe

	}}		}}

@@ Line 72: / Line 72: @@
 was to the best of his now remembrance about May or June last was a twelve
 moneth And saith hee last sawe the ''Consent'' in Aprill last past, shee
-then lyeing at the sayd Castles yards by REderiff wall and saith the
+then lyeing at the sayd Castles yards by Rederiff wall and saith the
 last tyme hee sawe the ''Phenix'' was when the dammage in question
 happened shee lyeing then in the River of Thames over against Rederiff stayres

@@ Line 77: / Line 77: @@
 where the dammage in question happened And further saving his foregoeing
 depositions in this cause taken (hee having bin formerly examined
-therein) to which hee presently XXX cannot more
+therein) to which hee presently ?here cannot more
 particularly answer to this Interrogatorie./
 }}