MRP: Possible new primary sources - Revision history

ColinGreenstreet at 09:00, March 19, 2012

2012-03-19T09:00:45Z

2012-03-19T06:16:01Z

2012-03-05T09:54:43Z

2012-02-13T07:13:28Z

2012-01-23T20:20:02Z

2012-01-16T11:53:12Z

2012-01-13T11:07:26Z

2012-01-02T18:00:59Z

2011-12-18T06:57:37Z

2011-12-16T18:41:43Z

@@ Line 193: / Line 193: @@
 '''Court of Chancery'''
 ----
-==Nicholar Buckeridge & family==
+==Nicholas Buckeridge & family==
 '''C 5/80/10 Short title: Buckeridge v Roberts. Plaintiffs: Edmund Buckeridge. Defendants: Robert Roberts and another. Subject: money matters, London or Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer, schedule. 1685'''

@@ Line 192: / Line 192: @@
 '''Court of Chancery'''
 ----
 ==Thomas Burnell & family==

@@ Line 144: / Line 144: @@
 '''Court of Chancery'''
-C 10/66/37
+C 5/49/54 Hunlocke v. Bludworth: Derby. 1666
-C 10/66/45
+C 5/443/58 Bludworth v. Swallow: Middlesex 1666
 C 10/66/78
 C 10/96/51 Dennis, Buckworth v. Gunn, Bludworth, Joliffe, Barnardiston
 C 10/99/17 Brandon v. Gunn, Bludworth, Joliffe, Barnardiston 1662
-C 10/473/33 Chaplin, Knight, Reekford, Moddiford, Bragg, Orgill & Duck v. Bludworth, knight, Chappell, Dike, Feilder, Birkett, and others: Middx  1670
+C 10/473/33 Chaplin, knight, Reekford, Moddiford, Bragg, Orgill & Duck v. Bludworth, knight, Chappell, Dike, Feilder, Birkett, and others: Middx. 1670
 (and a few more)

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 /08/11, CSG: Created page
 /01/12, CSG: Added hyperlinked index
+----
 ----
 ==Who is in the index==
@@ Line 11: / Line 12: @@
 The index below lists fifty-nine merchant individuals, who were commercially active at some time in the 1650-1669 period.
-Most of them were subscribers to the [''Smirna Venture Joint Stock''] and/or the ''King Fernandez Joint Stock'', with which George Oxenden and his brother Christopher Oxenden were associated.  Others have known commercial links to the Oxenden family or to the more commercially prominent of the subscribers to the two above mentioned joint stocks
+Most of them were subscribers to the [[MRP: Smirna Venture Joint Stock subscriber list| ''Smirna Venture Joint Stock'']] and/or the ''King Fernandez Joint Stock'', with which George Oxenden and his brother Christopher Oxenden were associated.  Others have known commercial links to the Oxenden family or to the more commercially prominent of the subscribers to the two above mentioned joint stocks
 ----
 ==How to use the index==
@@ Line 37: / Line 38: @@
 - Does the index record include a known merchant, either as plaintiff or defendant?
 ** Increases likelihood that the case is a commercial one
 ----
 ==Suggested links==

@@ Line 283: / Line 283: @@
 '''Court of Chancery'''
 ----
 ==William Cutler & Thomas Cutler (William's son)==

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 These probabalistic judgments are offered cautiously, and are based on various qualitative criteria:
-- Is the case marked Middlesex? (Increases likelihood that it is a commercial case)
+- Is the case marked Middlesex?
-- If the case is for a county away from London, is the county one associated with the named merchant individual
+** Increases likelihood that it is a commercial case
-- Is the case marked "money matters"? (Increases likelihood that it is a commercial case)
 - Does the index record indicate an attached schedule, and if so, is the description a commercial one?
-- Does the index record include a known merchant, either as plaintiff or defendant? (Increases likelihood that the case is a commercial one)
 ----
 __TOC__

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:07, January 13, 2012
Line 183:		Line 183:

	'''Court of Chancery'''		'''Court of Chancery'''
		+
		+	C 4/39/49 Henry Wyllughby v. Thomas Burnell and John Burnell: replication Date of document: Sixteenth century 1501 Jan 1 - 1600 Dec 31
		+	C 4/39/105 Robert Upcott and his wife Agnes v. Walter Burnell, John Burnell senr. and John Burnell junr.: replication Date of document: Sixteenth century 1501 Jan 1 - 1600 Dec 31

	C 5/379/23 Burnell v. Burnell: Middlesex, &c. 1650		C 5/379/23 Burnell v. Burnell: Middlesex, &c. 1650

@@ Line 123: / Line 123: @@
 C 5/24/5 Kendall v. Boone: Middlesex. 1656
 C 6/571/118 Short title: Duckett v Boone. First plaintiff: Duckett. Defendants: Boone. Document type: bill only. [1649-1714]
 '''C 9/97/16 Upton v. Boone 1688'''
 '''C 10/136/4 Boone, Upton, Bathurst, Haswell, Eyles v. Beeke: Middx 1679'''
 '''C 10/482/28 Boone, Uppton, Bathurst, Haswell, Wyles, Randall v. Wilkinson, Cole, Beake, Midge, Allinson, Parker: Middx 1679'''

@@ Line 266: / Line 266: @@
 '''C 10/74/18 Cutler v. Parkhurst, knight, Abdy, bart, Maynard, knight, Stowell & Mills: Middx. 1663'''
 '''C 10/98/19 Cutler v. Page: Middx. 1663'''
-- Have checked John Page letters (BHOL) for references to Cutler, but the published Paige letters are only for the years 1648-1658.<ref>G.F.Steckley (ed.), The letters of John Paige, London merchant, 1648-58 - London Record Society, vol. 21 (XXXX, XXXX), http://www.british-history.ac.uk/source.aspx?pubid=564, viewed 31/10/11</ref>
+- Have checked John Paige letters (BHOL) for references to Cutler, but the published Paige letters are only for the years 1648-1658.<ref>G.F.Steckley (ed.), The letters of John Paige, London merchant, 1648-58 - London Record Society, vol. 21 (XXXX, XXXX), http://www.british-history.ac.uk/source.aspx?pubid=564, viewed 31/10/11</ref>
 C 10/108/85 Keate v. Cutler: Middx 1664
 C 10/155/38 Cutlere v. Ryder, knight, Cocke, Backwell & Herne: Middx. 1669