William Sarsfield - Revision history

ColinGreenstreet at 22:54, October 31, 2016

2016-10-31T22:54:36Z

ColinGreenstreet at 13:21, October 31, 2016

2016-10-31T13:21:07Z

ColinGreenstreet at 13:14, October 31, 2016

2016-10-31T13:14:38Z

ColinGreenstreet: Created page with "{{Banner}} {{SemBioLongInfoBoxThree |Person=William Sarsfield |First name=William |Last name=Sarsfield |Occupation=Purser |Mariner occupation=Purser |Training=Not apprentice |..."

2016-10-31T12:59:53Z

Created page with "{{Banner}} {{SemBioLongInfoBoxThree |Person=William Sarsfield |First name=William |Last name=Sarsfield |Occupation=Purser |Mariner occupation=Purser |Training=Not apprentice |..."

New page

{{Banner}}
{{SemBioLongInfoBoxThree
|Person=William Sarsfield
|First name=William
|Last name=Sarsfield
|Occupation=Purser
|Mariner occupation=Purser
|Training=Not apprentice
|Citizen=Unknown
|Literacy=Signature
|Has opening text=William Sarsfeild
|Has signoff text=Wm: Sarsfield
|Transcription image={{#transcription-image: }}
|Language skills=English language,
|Res street=Wapping
|Res county=Middlesex
|Res country=England
|Birth year=1639
|First deposition age=21
|Deposition start page(s)=HCA 13/73 f.769r Annotate,
|Deposition date(s)=Dec 14 1660
|Has infobox completed=Yes
|Has synthesis completed=No
|Has HCA evidence completed=No
|Has source comment completed=No
|Type of ship=Merchant ship
|Role in Silver Ship litigation=None
}}
==Biographical synthesis==
William Sarsfield (alt. Sarsfeild) (b. ca. 1639; d. ?). Purser.

Purser of the ship the ''William and John'' (Master: [[William Goodlad]])

Resident in 1660 in Wapping.

==Evidence from High Court of Admiralty==
Twenty-one year old William Sarsfield deposed on December 14th 1660 in the High Court of Admiralty. He ws examined touching the perishablenes of some sugers brought hether in the ''William and John''.<ref>[[HCA 13/73 f.769r Annotate|HCA 13/73 f.769r]]</ref>

William Sarsfield stated that there was a parcel of four tons of brown sugars brought from Barbados in the ship the ''William and John'' (Master: William Goodlad). The sugars had been condemned in the Admiralty Court for freight due on them. The sugars were "n a perishable condition and doe dayly purge, an did some course be not spedily taken with them they will be soone spoiled".

William Sarsfield's deposition took place two days after the Primum Decretum of the Court, which is the "condemnation", which Sarsfield refers to. The schedule for the sugars has survived as an attachment to the Primum Decretum of the Court, dated December 12th 1654. Both this schedule and the Latin Primum Decretum are exhibited below.

[ADD SCHEDULE]

[ADD PRIMUM DECRETUM]

==Comment on sources==

@@ Line 42: / Line 42: @@
 [[File:William & John Sugars 1660 IMG 112 10 5604.PNG|800px|thumbnail|left|HCA 24/114 Schedule of sugars brought from Barbados by William Goodlad, attached to the Primum Decretum in the cause in the High Court of Admiralty of 'William Goodlad against the William and John', dated Dec 12th 1660]]
 ==Comment on sources==
@@ Line 53: / Line 51: @@
 PROB 11/395/52 Will of William Goodlad, Mariner being now bound out on a Voyage in the East India Company's Service to Some Port or Places in the East Indies in and with the Good Ship or Vessel Loyal Adventure of Stepney, Middlesex 16 April 1689

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:21, October 31, 2016
Line 46:		Line 46:

	==Comment on sources==		==Comment on sources==
		+	'''1640'''
		+
		+	PROB 11/182/388 Will of William Goodlad, Mariner of Leigh, Essex 13 March 1640
		+
		+	'''1689'''
		+
		+	PROB 11/395/52 Will of William Goodlad, Mariner being now bound out on a Voyage in the East India Company's Service to Some Port or Places in the East Indies in and with the Good Ship or Vessel Loyal Adventure of Stepney, Middlesex 16 April 1689

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 |Has opening text=William Sarsfeild
 |Has signoff text=Wm: Sarsfield
-|Transcription image={{#transcription-image: }}
+|Transcription image={{#transcription-image:  }}
 |Language skills=English language,
 |Res street=Wapping
@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
 Twenty-one year old William Sarsfield deposed on December 14th 1660 in the High Court of Admiralty. He ws examined touching the perishablenes of some sugers brought hether in the ''William and John''.<ref>[[HCA 13/73 f.769r Annotate|HCA 13/73 f.769r]]</ref>
-William Sarsfield stated that there was a parcel of four tons of brown sugars brought from Barbados in the ship the ''William and John'' (Master: William Goodlad). The sugars had been condemned in the Admiralty Court for freight due on them. The sugars were "n a perishable condition and doe dayly purge, an did some course be not spedily taken with them they will be soone spoiled".
+William Sarsfield stated that there was a parcel of four tons of brown sugars brought from Barbados in the ship the ''William and John'' (Master: William Goodlad). The sugars had been condemned in the Admiralty Court for freight due on them. The sugars were "in a perishable condition and doe dayly purge, an did some course be not spedily taken with them they will be soone spoiled".
 William Sarsfield's deposition took place two days after the Primum Decretum of the Court, which is the "condemnation", which Sarsfield refers to. The schedule for the sugars has survived as an attachment to the Primum Decretum of the Court, dated December 12th 1654. Both this schedule and the Latin Primum Decretum are exhibited below.
-[ADD SCHEDULE]
+[[File:William & John Sugars 1660 IMG 112 10 5604.PNG|800px|thumbnail|left|HCA 24/114 Schedule of sugars brought from Barbados by William Goodlad, attached to the Primum Decretum in the cause in the High Court of Admiralty of 'William Goodlad against the William and John', dated Dec 12th 1660]]
-[ADD PRIMUM DECRETUM]
+[[File:Primum Decretum William & John IMG 112 10 5609.PNG|1200px|thumbnail|left|HCA 24/114 Primum Decretum in the cause in the High Court of Admiralty of 'William Goodlad against the William and John', dated Dec 12th 1660]]
 ==Comment on sources==