Difference between revisions of "MRP: C5/15/3 f. 2"

From MarineLives
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
==C5/15/3 f. 2==
+
'''C5/15/3 f. 2'''
 +
 
 +
'''Editorial history'''
 +
 
 +
28/10/11, CSG: Created page
 +
----
 +
__TOC__
 
----
 
----
−
===Abstract===
+
==Suggested links==
  
 +
See biographical profile of [[MRP: Tobell Aylmer|Tobell Aylmer]] (the complainant)
  
 +
See [[MRP: C5/15/3 f. 1|C5/15/3 f. 1]] (the bill of complaint, to which C5/15/3 f. 2 is the answer)
 
----
 
----
−
===Transcription===
+
==To do==
 +
 
 +
(1) Complete and check this transcription
  
−
//The joynt and severall answeres of S:r ffrancis Williamson knight Edmund Lascell Esq:r and Phineas Rogers three of the defts to the//
 
−
//bill of complainte of Tobell Aylmer Esq:r complaynante//
 
 
----
 
----
−
===Commentary===
+
==Abstract & context==
  
−
See [[MRP: C5/15/3 f.1|C5/15/3 f.1]]
+
The Chancery suit C5/15/3 was brought by complainant Tobell Aylmer against Sir Francis Williamson, Edmund Lascell Esquire and Phineas Rogers.
 +
 
 +
[[MRP: C5/15/3 f. 1|C5/15/3 f. 1]] is the bill of complaint of Tobell Aylmer. C5/15/3 f. 2 is the answer of Sir Francis Williamson, Edmund Lascella nd Phineas Rogers.
 +
 
 +
The bill and the answer are dated 1653, and relate to alleged events in 1649.
  
 
----
 
----
−
===Notes===
+
==Transcription==
 +
 
 +
//The joynt and severall answeres of S:r ffrancis Williamson knight Edmund Lascell Esq:r and Phineas Rogers three of the defts to the//
 +
//bill of complainte of Tobell Aylmer Esq:r complaynante//
 +
 
 +
//All advantage
 +
 
 +
//now and at all
 +
 
 +
//answer unto
 +
 
 +
//and uniust
 +
 
 +
//XXXX satisfacconn
 +
 
 +
//pson or psons
 +
 
 +
//that hee beinge
 +
 
 +
//desire this defendant
 +
 
 +
//summe or summes
 +
 
 +
//Edward Clavell
 +
 
 +
//faithfull promise
 +
 
 +
//XXX ffrancis
 +
 
 +
//Dorothy
 +
 
 +
// the Complaynant
 +
 
 +
//settled and
 +
 
 +
//Complaynante
 +
 
 +
//now enioyeth
 +
 
 +
//above menconned
 +
 
 +
//bill menconned
 +
 
 +
//arise: And
 +
 
 +
//to bee paid
 +
 
 +
//Common Law
 +
 
 +
//is still in force
 +
 
 +
//Clovell did give
 +
 
 +
//estate of thesaid Clovell
 +
 
 +
//harmelesse him
 +
 
 +
//called
 +
 
 +
//this deft
 +
 
 +
//ever intended
 +
 
 +
//is before
 +
 
 +
//borrowed
 +
 
 +
//whatsoever
 +
 
 +
//these defendants
 +
 
 +
//say that the
 +
 
 +
//Reeve
 +
 
 +
//betweene
 +
 
 +
//effectuall
 +
 
 +
//dismissed
 +
 
 +
//theire reasonable costs and charges in this behalfe wrongfully susteyned//
  
  
  
 +
//TIMO: POLLARD [Signature; botton RH side]//
 
----
 
----
−
===Possible primary sources===
+
 
 +
==Notes==
  
  
  
 
----
 
----
 +
==Possible primary sources==
 +
 +
'''TNA'''
 +
 +
C 5/43/4 Aylmer v. Michenson: Essex 1663
 +
 +
C 6/130/5 Short title: Aylmer v Clovile. Plaintiffs: Tobell Aylmer. Defendants: Edward Clovile, Joan Riddesdall and Edward Basse. Subject: property in West Hanningfield, Essex. Document type: bill, answer. 1654
 +
C 6/224/27A Short title: Clovill v Williamson. Plaintiffs: Mary Clovill and Elizabeth Clovill. Defendants: Edmund Williamson, Wignoll Bigg and John Rouse. Subject: property in Felsted, Essex. Document type: bill, answer. JFP 1677
 +
 +
C 10/5/21 Edward Clovyle and Anne his wife, Tobell Aylmer, John Higden, Edward Shelton, Edmund Burton and others v Thomas Barker: West Hanningfield, Essex 1649
 +
C 10/93/11 Ball v. Blackwell, Aylmer, Starkey, Pary, Pratt, Cunditt: Middx 1662

Latest revision as of 08:38, January 5, 2012

C5/15/3 f. 2

Editorial history

28/10/11, CSG: Created page




Suggested links


See biographical profile of Tobell Aylmer (the complainant)

See C5/15/3 f. 1 (the bill of complaint, to which C5/15/3 f. 2 is the answer)


To do


(1) Complete and check this transcription


Abstract & context


The Chancery suit C5/15/3 was brought by complainant Tobell Aylmer against Sir Francis Williamson, Edmund Lascell Esquire and Phineas Rogers.

C5/15/3 f. 1 is the bill of complaint of Tobell Aylmer. C5/15/3 f. 2 is the answer of Sir Francis Williamson, Edmund Lascella nd Phineas Rogers.

The bill and the answer are dated 1653, and relate to alleged events in 1649.


Transcription


//The joynt and severall answeres of S:r ffrancis Williamson knight Edmund Lascell Esq:r and Phineas Rogers three of the defts to the//
//bill of complainte of Tobell Aylmer Esq:r complaynante//

//All advantage

//now and at all

//answer unto

//and uniust

//XXXX satisfacconn

//pson or psons

//that hee beinge

//desire this defendant

//summe or summes

//Edward Clavell

//faithfull promise

//XXX ffrancis

//Dorothy

// the Complaynant

//settled and

//Complaynante

//now enioyeth

//above menconned

//bill menconned

//arise: And

//to bee paid

//Common Law

//is still in force

//Clovell did give

//estate of thesaid Clovell

//harmelesse him

//called

//this deft

//ever intended

//is before

//borrowed

//whatsoever

//these defendants

//say that the

//Reeve

//betweene

//effectuall

//dismissed

//theire reasonable costs and charges in this behalfe wrongfully susteyned//


//TIMO: POLLARD [Signature; botton RH side]//

Notes



Possible primary sources


TNA

C 5/43/4 Aylmer v. Michenson: Essex 1663

C 6/130/5 Short title: Aylmer v Clovile. Plaintiffs: Tobell Aylmer. Defendants: Edward Clovile, Joan Riddesdall and Edward Basse. Subject: property in West Hanningfield, Essex. Document type: bill, answer. 1654
C 6/224/27A Short title: Clovill v Williamson. Plaintiffs: Mary Clovill and Elizabeth Clovill. Defendants: Edmund Williamson, Wignoll Bigg and John Rouse. Subject: property in Felsted, Essex. Document type: bill, answer. JFP 1677

C 10/5/21 Edward Clovyle and Anne his wife, Tobell Aylmer, John Higden, Edward Shelton, Edmund Burton and others v Thomas Barker: West Hanningfield, Essex 1649
C 10/93/11 Ball v. Blackwell, Aylmer, Starkey, Pary, Pratt, Cunditt: Middx 1662

Retrieved from ‘http://www.marinelives.org/index.php?title=MRP:_C5/15/3_f._2&oldid=7037’