Uploaded image; transcribed on 29/09/2017
deponent bought the said shipps present lading of salt with the said proceeds at or after the rate of 310 gilders for each hundred, being in all seaven hundred of salt or thereabouts, for the accompt aforesaid, and was sailing with the same for the East countrey to be delivered there for the said accompt[?s] but was met with and carried up to ffalmouth by a frigot of this Commonwealth, And otherwise hee cannot depose, saving the said [?Barndrini] is a greate dealer in salt. To the fourth article hee saith and deposeth that the arlate Claes [?CXX] was none of the shipps company nor went in her from Lubeck nor was present at the alading of the said Clapboard, nor went from Riga in the said shipp to Saint Martin, nor did this deponent ever see him till this deponent came with the said shipp to Saint Martins as aforesaid, when having about halfe delivered the said shipp, and meeting there with the said Claus who was destitute of imployment by meanes of a hamborough shipp wherein hee came thither her being there cast away, hee this deponent ther hired and shipt him to goe boatswaine of his said shipp and this was about the middle of October last past, after that this deponent had soe made sale of the said clapboards to the said [BXXXX] who before such his buying the same there of this deponent, had nt any interest whatsoever therein, but this deponent being therewith instructed was at libertie to have sold them to whom hee pleased [?XX] such sale made to the said Bourderway, And therefore hee saith that hee be by the said [?Croyer] deposed or said in his examination to be by him deposed as is in the article mentioned, the same is contrary to the truth as hee saith, and likely to have happened by misunderstanding him for this deponent could never finde or perceive that hee the said [?Croyer] understood English, but spake and understood only the East countrey language, And otherwise saving his foregoeing deposition hee cannot depose. To the 5th hee saith that hee this deponent at his examination and [?XX] the truth was said hee was imployed by Nicholas Cordes, and did [?XXX] Cordes, and said that Andrew Dessell of Riga (and not Andrew Thessell of Rey) was part owner and lader of the said clapboards and to the truth, and that if it be otherwise set downe, it is [?erratum] To the Interrogatories To the first hee saith hee tooke chardge of and came aboard the said shipp as master upon her fitting and furnishing at Lubeck after her said building referring himselfe to his foregoeing deposition. To the second hee saith hee hath knowne the said Nicholas Cordes, William White and Albert Saffe about 20 yeares, during which they have always lived in Lubeck, and as hee beleeveth were all borne therem and that [?XXX] hee hath knowne the said Andrew Dassell to be and to have bin of Riga for theise eight yeares last and there inhabiting for all that time, and as hee beleeveth the said Andrew is a native of Riga, and that the said persons respectively keep their wives and families in the said respective places. To the third hee saith that besides the said Cordes, White and Saffa, hee this deponent, Joachim [?vrXXXXe], Detcliffe [?Deales] and Gunert [?GXXXXX] all of Lubeck, natives, and houskeepers there and have lived there all their times, were alsoe builders of the said shipp and were and are owners thereof
[[File:IMG_117_07_0511.jpg|thumbnail|800px|none|link=Special:TranscriptionInterface/IMG_117_07_0511.jpg|[[:HCA 13/68|HCA 13/68]] f.476v: Right click on image for full size image in separate window
[[Parent volume::HCA 13/68]] [[Folio::476]] [[Side::Recto]]
HCA 13/68 f.476v Annotate# QUERYdcdcfd951d2de5a2637278fc8a5561db
[[Parent volume::HCA 13/68]] [[Folio::477]] [[Side::Recto]]
HCA 13/68 f.476v Annotate# QUERY18b886cfc095c72f2904bf3fcbcf7455