Uploaded image; transcribed on 26/04/2015
John and William Mitchell and} Company marriners of the shippe} the ''Willinge Mind'' whereof} Thomas Poisson is Master against} John Vincent Mr ffrancklyn} Which day the said ffrancklin appeared for the said Davies Mitchell and Company and made himselfe partie for them and [?Faine] an allegation in writing which the Judges admitted soe farre as the same is by lawe admissible Then the said ffrancklin uppon the said allegation produced the said [?William] Vincent as a party principall whom the Judges receaved and administred an oath unto him to speake the truth at the time of his answeareinge and monished him to give in the same by wednesday next./. James Cooke and Maynard} Johnson late Marriners of the} shipp the ''Tankervaile'' against the} said shippe and against Richard} Batson and Company commeing in} for their interest therein Clements} Smith} Which day appeared the proctors and Councell on both sides and the deponents proffes and evidence taken and made in this cause beinge read and the whole matter beinge argued and debated by the Councell on both sides The Court upon serious and mature deliberation had there upon did [?finalr] interloquend] declare and pronounce that the said Cooke and Johnson ought not by lawe to have any wages for their service in the said shippe the ''Tankervaile'' the voyage in question and that the said Batson and Company ought to bee dismissed from any further observation of Judgement in this busines and did absolve and dismisse them from the demannds made by the said Cooke and Janson by this suite the said Clements dissentinge et cetera and protesting of the nullity and greivance and of appealinge./. [?Gribble] and Greenefeild against the} ''King David'' and against De Geere} and others Smith Suckley} Which day ffrancklin on the behalfe of the Commissioners for examination of witnesses did present their [?proces] upon the examination of witnesses on the behalfe of the said [?Grabble] and Greenefeild which the proctors on both sides did accept soe farre forth as they make for them and not otherwise And then the Judges at Smiths petition did decree publication of the said depositions and decreed copies thereof Suckley dissentinge./. Warner against Watson} Budd Suckley} Which day Mr ffrancklin by reason of the absence of Mr Budd appeared for the said Warner and made himselfe partie for him and exhibited the originall mandate with the certificate thereon indorsed and then appeared the said Watson whome the Judges monished to give a full and plaine answeare to all the articles of the libell given against him in this cause and monished him to putt in the same before the next Court day Then the said ffrancklin upon
[[File:CIMG2135.JPG|thumbnail|800px|none|link=Special:TranscriptionInterface/CIMG2135.JPG|[[:HCA 3/46|HCA 3/46]] f.638r: Right click on image for full size image in separate window
HCA 3/46 f.638r Annotate# QUERYcb1fd4f9a930dab5ed2bf19a4806f2ff
[[Parent volume::HCA 3/46]] [[Folio::637]] [[Side::Verso]]
HCA 3/46 f.638r Annotate# QUERYefdbe64ba0c1faa6e067130e5940cdf5
[[Parent volume::HCA 3/46]] [[Folio::638]] [[Side::Verso]]
HCA 3/46 f.638r Annotate# QUERY98e6c38d0f7e85b67cbbb781b3f67ed7
HCA 3/46 f.638r Annotate# QUERYe85c034b95569f169c6ad3fac9167c5a