| Transcription
|
25. November 1651
Mid[?laton] con Batt.
… 25. November 1651
Mid[?laton] con Batt.
Upon the first allegation given in this Cause
'''Rp.'''
'''2.'''
'''henry Turner''' of London Merchant aged 36 yeares<br />
or thereabouts a wittnes sworne and Examined deposeth as<br />
followeth videlicet./
To the [?2]4th article of the said Allegation hee saith and deposeth<br />
that hee hath well knowne the handwriting of his contest Peter<br />
Stoner for the space of these ten yeares last past And hath of late perused<br />
his the said Stoners books of Accomp[?s] and Journalls, And therein doth<br />
find that in the yeare 1645 there was laden aboard Thomas Middletons<br />
shipp (as hee was Master thereof) for the Accompt of the arlate Mr Thomas<br />
Batt one hundred and fifty Eight [?modinas] of salt<br />
nine hundred twenty three oxe hydes<br />
and 12[?000] Ryalls double plate And this hee deposeth for that hee hath bin very<br />
conversant with the said Peter Stoner , and well knoweth his handwriteinge<br />
and hath perused the bookes as aforesaid, And further hee saith hee cannot depose
To the rest hee is not Examined by the direction of the producent./-
To the Interrogatories [CENTRE HEADING]
To the first. 2. 3. 4. 5. and 6th Interrogatories hee saith hee cannot ans[?weare GUTTER]<br />
or depose.
To the 7th hee saith that hee is not indebted to the interrogated mary Batt<br />
And further hee cannot depose or answeare./
To the 8. and 9th articles hee saith hee cannot answeare.
To the 10th hee referreth himself to his deposition made to the 14th article of<br />
the said allegation, And further hee saith hee cannot depose./
To the 11th hee saith hee knoweth not nor can answeare thereunto [?saveing GUTTER]<br />
his foregoeing depositions to which hee referreth himself And further hee cannot<br />
answare or depose./
Repeated before doctor Clarke./
Henry Turner [SIGNATURE, RH SIDE]
UNIQc9e5f3270dd0653b-nowiki-0000015A-QINU
19. december 1651.
Bagnall against Stephens}<br />
Smith. Suckley}
Upon the Allegation given on the behalf of the<br />
said Stephens Examined
['''dXXXX''']
'''Thomas Dunaway''' of Newport in the Isle of Wight<br />
Yeoman aged 37 yeares or thereabouts a wittnes sworne and [?examined GUTTER]<br />
deposeth as followeth./
To the first article of the said allegation hee saith and deposeth That the<br />
Shipp the ''Constant'' arlate was built at kiningsbarricke belonging to the<br />
Duke of Brandenburgh about fourteene yeares since, And hee saith that [?att ?the GUTTER]<br />
time of the building thereof and for many yeares after shee was called and [?knowne GUTTER]<br />
by the name of the ''ffrederick and william'' in honor of the said duke whose [?name GUTTER]<br />
hee gave the said shipp and att that time the arlate Allan Ruddocke was [?master GUTTER]<br />
thereof and so contynued for divers yeares after which hee knoweth for that hee went Master thereof [?from GUTTER]<br />
Quinninsburgh to this Port of London and this deponent came in the said shipp with<br />
him And hee saith that the said Ruddocke did cause the said Shipp to bee built<br />
him self and the arlate John d[XX]way William Buck[?e] and John [XXX GUTTER]<br />
John davison and others Subiects to the king of Poland, And further saith that [XXX GUTTER]<br />
the time of the building thereof the arlate John ffletcher had not any<br />
right interest or pretence unto the said shipp or any part thereof which hee deposeth<br />
for that hee was well acquainted with the building of the said shipp and very [XXX GUTTER]<br />
her builders and part Owners thereof as aforesaid And further cannot depose<br />
[XXXX GUTTER]er cannot depose<br />
[XXXX GUTTER] +
|
