Difference between revisions of "MRP: HCA 13/73"

From MarineLives
Jump to: navigation, search
(Renamed to "HCA 13/73 Part One")
 
(97 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
''' HCA 13/73''' 1659-?
+
#redirect HCA 13/73 Part One
 
+
'''Editorial history'''
+
 
+
01/05/12, CSG: Created page
+
01/05/12, CSG: Made 127 digital images (P1110298 to P1110425)
+
26/05/12, CSG: Transcribed 35 full pages to date
+
----
+
__TOC__
+
----
+
==Suggested links==
+
 
+
See Admiralty court cases"]
+
 
+
See [[MRP: Synthesis|Synthesis]]
+
See [[MRP: Transcription|Transcription]]
+
----
+
==To do==
+
 
+
----
+
==Physical description==
+
 
+
 
+
----
+
==Sample transcriptions==
+
===Front Cover===
+
 
+
P1110298 recto front cover
+
 
+
'''So-so quality digital image'''
+
 
+
//XXXX13
+
January 1658
+
March 1660//
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110299 verso & recto
+
 
+
'''Poor quality digital image'''
+
 
+
DOUBLE PAGE, WITH RECTO F15 RECTO
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110300 f. 15 recto
+
 
+
'''High quality digital image'''
+
 
+
===Case: Maurice Thompson Alderman William Thompson et al., freighters of the Maydenhead vs. the VOC:  Deposition: 5.  William Reading, of Redriff wall, St Mary Magdalen Bermondsey, Surrey, Mariner, aged 35: Date: January 19th 1658===
+
 
+
//The 19:th day of January 1658 English style
+
 
+
Maurice Thompson Alderman William Thompson)
+
& other freighters of the shipp the ''Maydenhead'')
+
agt the Dutch East India Company in pticular and)
+
all other x:r X XXXXXX)
+
 
+
Examined on the allegation given in
+
XX XXX of November 1658 on behalfe of
+
the sayd ffreighters
+
 
+
5  WILLIAM READING of Rederiff wall
+
in the parish of S:t Mary Magdalen Bermond-
+
sey in the County of Surrey mariner aged
+
thirty five yeares or thereabouts a wittnesse
+
sworne & examined saith and deposeth
+
as followeth viz:t
+
 
+
To the 10:th arle of the sayd allegation hee saith that hee
+
this deponent was purser of the shipp the ''Olive Branch'' an
+
English shipp which went upon a tradeing voyage from London bound
+
for Bantam but at her comeing thither the sayd shipp ''Olive
+
Branch'' was hindred by certayne dutch shipps of warr belonging
+
to and being in the implyment of the dutch East India Company
+
by which meanes ?they wwas forced to goe to an Island in XXX
+
PaXXogando upon the Coast of Sumatra and there pXXXX her lading
+
of pepper to be brought
+
secretly unknowne to the dutch in XXXX or boates from
+
Bantam to the sayd Island of Pullegand:o where the shipp the
+
''Olive Branch'' ridd And saith that hee being XXXX a foresayd Puerser
+
of the sayd shipp and on XXXX at Bantam during the moneths
+
of  January ffebruary and part of March in the yeare of our
+
Lord 1656 while the lading of pepper which was shipped aboard
+
the ''Olive Branch'' was proXXXing at Bantam to be sent to
+
Pollegaade and takeing the  weight there of and imployed in
+
sending the same away thaereby knoweth that in the yeare and
+
moneth aforesayd pepper might then have bin hard at Bantam bought
+
of the Chinese (sic) & was by the Chinese offered XXXXXXXXXX
+
there to be sold to ?sayth as would buy the same at the rate of five
+
and a halfe pence alright or XXXX for the parcell every parcell
+
being comonly accompted one hundred sixty two pounds English weight
+
And saith that the ''Olive Branch'' having taken in her ladeing
+
of pepper at ?Pulligaade  XXXXX XXXXX and brought the same
+
to Ligorno which was according to Charterpty the Port whither
+
she was designed to carry the same And hee this deponent goeing
+
Purser in her to Ligorno knoweth that in the Moneths of ffebruary
+
and March 1657 in which moneths the sayd shipp ''Olive Branch''
+
was & remayned in the Port of Ligorno XXXX pepper was brought in XXXX was there frequently
+
and commonly sold at the rate of  twenty peeces of eight
+
per hundred English weight, and hee this deponent having some
+
pepper pf his owne which was brought hither in the sayd shipp
+
did there sell the same at som what a bove
+
that rate of twenty peeces of eight per hundred English weight
+
And further to this arle hee cannot depose.
+
 
+
To the rest of the articles hee is not examinat, by ?direction
+
 
+
WILLIAM READING [His signature]
+
 
+
Repetit before Dor Godolphin//
+
----
+
P1110301 verso & recto
+
 
+
'''Very poor quality digital image'''
+
----
+
P1110302 f. 15 verso
+
 
+
//and saith hee last sawe the ?Consent lyeing on shoare at Redriff
+
about two or three moneths since & saith the last tyme hee sawe the
+
?shipp was to the best of his now rememberance about a yeares &
+
a halfe since XXXXX neere Wapping And further to ?this Interest hee XXXX
+
answereth not seeing the ''Consent'' at her first mooreing nor
+
knowing when she came ?first to moore in the River of
+
Thames./
+
 
+
about
+
XXX
+
a halfe
+
answere
+
knowing
+
XXXX
+
 
+
To the 3 hee saith hee
+
 
+
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
+
 
+
<nowiki>************************************************</nowiki>
+
 
+
===Case: S:r John Dethicke John Bancks Hugh fforth, and Company: Deposition: George Dethick, of London, Merchant, aged 30: Date: January 24th 1658===
+
 
+
//The 24:th of January 1658 English Style
+
 
+
A business of Examination of  witnesses upon
+
XXXXX Interries XXXXXX XXX the part and
+
behalfe of S:r John Dethicke John Bancks
+
Hugh fforth, and Company XXXX certain
+
XXXXX aboard the shipp the ''ffrancis & John'' (Cap:t
+
XX XXXX Commander) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
+
of XXXXX the XXXXXXXX of the Dutch East India
+
Company.
+
ffrancklin
+
 
+
Rp
+
 
+
GEORGE DETHICK of London Merchant
+
aged thirty yeares or thereabouts, a
+
wittnesse sworne before the right Wor:ll
+
John Godolphin doctor of Lawes one of
+
the Judges of the high Court of Admiralty
+
of England saith and deposeth viz:t.
+
 
+
To the first Interrogatorie hee saith that hee well knoweth that the
+
Interrogate Hugh fforth
+
did in the moneth of ffebruary 1656 cause to be laden and put on board
+
the Interrogate shipp the ''ffrancis & John'' whereof the Interrogate
+
Lawrence MXXXing was Master, then lyeing in the River of Thames
+
and bound for Bantam Interrogate two Chests conteyning sixe and
+
twenty Barres and sixteene XXXX
+
marked & numbered as in the Margent
+
to be transported in her for Bantam & their disposed of for his
+
Accompt & the proceeds thereof to be thence returned in her for his
+
Account XXXXXXXXX knoweth say that hee went Supracargo of the
+
sayd shipp the voyage in question XXXXXXXXXXXXXX And further to this Interrorie saving his
+
subsequent deposition hee cannot depose
+
 
+
To the Interrorie hee saith that hee being XXXXXX as a foresayd
+
knoweth that upon the ladeing of the two chests and the XXXX XXXXX XXXX
+
XXXXXXXX XXXXX the sayd shipp XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
+
XXXX//
+
----
+
P1110303 f. ?18 recto
+
 
+
'''Very poor quality digital image: REIMAGE THIS PAGE'''
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110304 verso & recto f. 18 verso & f. 19 recto
+
 
+
'''High quality digital image'''
+
----
+
P1110305 f. 18 verso
+
 
+
'''Poor quality digital image: REIMAGE THIS PAGE'''
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110306 f. 52 recto
+
 
+
'''High quality digital image'''
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110307 verso & recto
+
 
+
'''Poor quality digital image'''
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110308 verso
+
 
+
'''High quality digital image'''
+
 
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110309 verso & recto: REIMAGE THESE PAGES
+
 
+
'''Unreadable digital image'''
+
----
+
P1110310 P 55 verso
+
 
+
'''Good quality digital image'''
+
 
+
===Case: Claim of Stephen ?Pallavacio, of Genoa, regarding silver bars: Deposition: 1.  Peter Vandeput, of London, merchant, aged 47: Date: January 29th, 1658===
+
 
+
The 27:th of January 1658
+
Examined upon the allon and
+
XXX on the behalfe of the said claime
+
 
+
//The claime of Stephen ?Pallavicio
+
of Genoa for sixe barrs of silver
+
in the ''S:t Laurence'' Peter BoughXXXXX
+
M:r taken by the ''Coventry frigot''
+
 
+
1.  PETER VANDEPUT of London Merchant
+
aged 47 yeares of therabouts sworne and
+
examined
+
 
+
To the first and second arles of the said Allon hee saith hee hath
+
corresponded with the producent Stephen Pallavicino in y:e wayes of
+
Merchandize, and saith hee was and is comonly reputed a native
+
subject, & Inhabitant of the State of Genoa, and saith hee beleeveth
+
him to bee, having bin credibly informed that hee is a ?patrician
+
of the City and State of Genoa, and this depo:t hath often
+
received Letters from y:e said pducent dated at Genoa, as the
+
place of his Dwelling, and hath accordingly directed his Letters to
+
him there, and further hee doth not depose
+
 
+
To the 3:d hee saith that by the Dealings and Correspondence
+
w:ch this Dep:t hath  for ?diverse yeeres had, and hath with the said producent XX XXXX XXX of XXXXX hee
+
verily beleeveth him to be a merch:t of great dealing worth
+
and Quality and saith hee hath and doth drive a trade &
+
Commerce from y:e Canaryes  and y:e dominions of the King of
+
Spaine in, and with silver by his ffactors there resident, and
+
that before y:e bringing of the silver in question to this port
+
this depo:t hath received to the vallue of betwixt twelve and
+
thirteene hundred pounds for the sd products account from y:e Canaryes, the
+
same being Consigned unto him this depo:t & further hee deposeth
+
not:
+
 
+
To the 4:th arle hee saith that before y:e lading of the silver
+
in question namely about two yeeres since and severall other times
+
this Depo:t received letters from severall Genoeses, and alsoe from
+
the said Palavacino himselfe, whereby they desired this Depo:t to
+
advise them whether they might not safely send silver or Bullion
+
to London. and without danger Consigne the same to this
+
depo:t or to the same effect.  And this depo:t thinking. (besides
+
the furtherance of Trade & Comerce) that hee should doe good
+
service to this Comonwealth, did thereupon write to, and
+
encourage them to send silver thither, And for further incouragement
+
of the sd prodc:t this dep:t caused the Act of Parliam:t made for
+
importacon of Bullion, to be Translated into Spanish and ?sent
+
the same to him and them, and hee referreth himselfe to y:e said Act of
+
Parliam:t for Importaccon of silver. And further hee doth not depose
+
 
+
To the 5:th 6:th & 7:th arles and the Letter of Advise, and Invoice XXX
+
y:e sd 6:th arle mentioned, Nowe shewed unto him, hee saith & XXXX
+
deposeth that in or about the monethes of July or August last ?past
+
this depo:t received advise from the said producents ffactor
+
Don Luis Perez de Vittoria that hee had laded at S:ta Cruz del OzXXXXX
+
(being a port in y:e Island of Tenereife on of the Canary Islands) ?about
+
the said ship the ''S:t Laurence'' whereof Petr Bonningysent is M:r for y:e
+
Account of the said Stephen Palavasino, two barrs of silver, and
+
?consigned//
+
----
+
P1110311 f. 56 recto
+
 
+
'''High quality digital image'''
+
 
+
//Consigned the same to be delivered to this depo:t herein  XXX XXX
+
for the said Account of the said ''Provident'': and afterwards this
+
depot received the Letter of advise and Invoice annexed from him
+
the said ffacto:r by the said ship ''S:t Laurence'' XXXX XXX seizure together
+
with the bill of Lading arlate w:ch hee hath nowe alsoe seene, And
+
this depo:t hath heard that the said ship belonged to the arlate M:r
+
fford, And further hee deposeth not, saving that the said Letter
+
Invoice and Bill of Lading Exhibited were and are the same
+
soe by him received:
+
 
+
To the 8:th hee saith that after the XX XXXX hee this depo:t was
+
advised by letters from Plymouth of the seizure of the said ship
+
and Lading by Captaine Aylett, and of her bringing in thither
+
where shee was brought (as hee saith) to this port for this depo:t
+
here received the said silver in question out of her, and further
+
deposeth not.
+
 
+
To the 9:th hee saith hee is well assured and verily beleeveth
+
that the said two barrs of silver were really and truely pvided
+
and laded for y:e prop and sole account of y:e sad producent and
+
upon his adventure, and that hee runneth the sole hazard thereof
+
and that noe Spaniard or other subject of the King of Spaine
+
had at the time of the said Lading and seizure any interest
+
therein w:ch hee is ?induced the more assuredly to beleeve for
+
y:t this depo:t by theproducents order hath and ?must make good the proceeds
+
thereof unto them and that amounted with him for y:e same as
+
will noe other, And further deposeth not
+
 
+
To the 10:th hee saith hee beleeveth there was peace, and Amity
+
betweene the Comonwealth and the State of Genoa. and their
+
subjects the time arlate, and further doth not depose:
+
 
+
To the 11:th hee saith that his foregoeing depon is true.
+
 
+
To the Interrogatoryes
+
 
+
To the first hee saith hee cometh required by M:r ffrancklin to be
+
pduced in this Cause, and otherwise negatively :
+
 
+
To the second hee saith hee was never at Genoa nor ever
+
sawe the pducent that hee knoweth of norknowe his ffather
+
or mother. and otherwise referreth himselfe to his foregoeing
+
depons:
+
 
+
To the 3:d hee saith that hee this depo:t hath had severall Letters, and
+
orders from y:e said producent Stephen Pallavacine touching y:e
+
silver now in question, and hee doth not knowe any other
+
person besides him XX XXXX. And further hee cannot answer, saving his
+
forgoeing depon to w:ch hee referreth himselfe.
+
 
+
To the 4:th hee saith that this depo:t hath received pt of the foresd
+
silver by him deposed of (not sent in y:e ''S:t Laurence'' ) in the
+
''King David'' in or about XXX last, part in y:e ''Hope'', about the
+
same time, and hee is sure that y:e said Pallavacino (the now
+
XXXXX) is the same pson for whose account the foresd pXXX
+
silver in question was laded and consigned to this Depo:t for y:t
+
this depo:t hath XX XXX made the same goods with them as aforesaid
+
To//
+
----
+
P1110312 f. 55 verso & f. 56 recto
+
 
+
'''Reasonable quality digital image'''
+
----
+
P1110313 f. 56 verso
+
 
+
'''Reasonable quality digital image'''
+
 
+
//To the 5:th hee saith hee doth not knowe the said Don Luis
+
Peroz de Vittoria the said pducents said ffactor personally. and
+
saith hee knoweth not that the said de Vittoria is ffactor to any
+
Spaniard or subject of the King of Spaine, nor hath this
+
Depo:t received order from any pson to claime the said silber
+
in Question other than the said pducent from whom hee
+
saith hee hath received Expresse order therein, and hath had
+
?procuzaccon from him alone in that be halafe, and other
+
wise negatively saving as aforesd, saying y:e said Don
+
Luis Perez de Vittoria is soe farr from  having given any
+
order for Claiming y:e silver in question that hee Doth not as
+
this depot beleeveth yet knowe of the seizure tehreof
+
 
+
To the 6:th hee saith that upon the bringing in of the said
+
ship to Plymouth the bill of lading interrogated together w:th
+
the Letter & ffactory were amongst other paps sent there
+
in a packet to this depo:t as coming out of the said ship.
+
and this depo:t brought them into this Court.
+
 
+
To the 7:th hee saith hee knoweth not ought if any other bill
+
of Lading touching y:e said silver in Question than the said
+
bill soe brought into Court, and here remaining, nor of
+
any other Invoice than that annexed to the Allon whereupon
+
hee is now Examined, and otherwise hee referreth himselfe to his
+
foregoing depon:
+
 
+
PETER VANDEPUT  [His signature]
+
 
+
Repeated before the two Judges in Court
+
 
+
<nowiki>**********************************************</nowiki>
+
===Case: Claim of Stephen ?Pallavacio, of Genoa, regarding silver bars: Deposition: 2.  Abraham Cabeljan, of London, merchant, aged 53: Date: January 27th, 1658===
+
 
+
The same day
+
 
+
Examined upon y:e said Allon:
+
 
+
2:nd  ABRAHAM CABELJAN of London merchant aged 53
+
yeeres or thereabouts, sworne and Examined:
+
 
+
To the first and second articles hee saith and deposeth that the
+
pducent Steven Pallavacino, was and is commonly reuted a native
+
of Genoa. and Inhabitant Subject of that Comonwealth, and saith
+
that hee this depo:t livimng with and being Book Keep. of. and for the
+
p:rcontests M:r Peter Vandeput merchant hath seene severall Letters
+
from the said product Living at Genoa sent to and received by the said M:r Vandeputt XXX Correspondent
+
here, and severall Letters of his directed to y;e said producent, and there
+
resident, And further hee deposeth not
+
 
+
To the 3:d arle hee saith that before y:e silver in question came & arrived
+
here in England, the ffactor of the said producent called don Luis
+
Perez de Vittoria, sent from the Iland of Teneriffe to the XXXX
+
M:r Vandepur, for his the said producents Accompt to the Vallue
+
of betwixt telve and thirteene hundred pounds sterling in silver w:ch XXX
+
received by the said M:r Vandeput for the account of y:e said pducent
+
and was soe received by the said M:r vandeput herein this XXXX
+
before y:e arrivall of y:e silver in question of this depo:ts sihht, who XXX
+
XXX receipt thereof and y:e Letters and dispacthes concerninge y:e
+
XXXX//
+
----
+
P1110314 f. 57 recto
+
 
+
'''So-so quality digital image'''
+
 
+
//Hath placed the same to the said producent's Accompt, hee being as
+
aforesd & booke XXX of the said M:r Vandeput and thereby hee well knoweth
+
that the said Stephen Pallavacine hath and doth drive a greate trade in
+
silver, from the Canaryes, And further thee doth not depose
+
 
+
To the 4:th arle hee saith that before the Lading the silver in question
+
aboard the said ship the ''S:t Laurence'' severall Genoese merchants
+
wrote ?unto the said M:r Vandeput to London, whereby they desired him
+
to certifye or advise them, whether or noe they might safely send
+
silver and bullion to London, and consigne the same to him the said
+
M:r Vandeput, without danger of seizing or confiscacion of y:e same
+
And saith the said M:r Vandeput wrote to them that they might
+
doe it safely, and XXXX XXX them in such sending and sent a
+
Translacon in XXXXX of the Act of parliam:t in that behalfe
+
made for the security of such Importacons w:ch hee knoweth
+
having seene y:e said Letters soe received and the answeres thereof
+
being privy to the said M:r Vandeputs dispatches in such matters
+
(hee being his booke keep as aforesaid) in his affaires of moment
+
touching his ?Commerce.
+
 
+
To the 5:th 6:th and 7:th arles hee saith that before any newes of y:e
+
seizure of y:e ship ''S:t Laurence'' in question the said M:r Peter vandeput
+
receaved Letters by other?s shipping from the said Don Luiz Peroz
+
de Vittoria, advising him of the Lading of the two barrs of silver
+
(w:ch are nowe claimed) aboard the said ship the ''S:t Laurence'' and
+
of the Consignment thereof to him the said M:r Vandeput for y:e
+
said producents account to be heere delivered in this Port
+
And that afterwards the said M:r Vandeput received advise from
+
Plimouth of the bringing in of the said ship thither and received
+
a packet of Letters, and dispatched thence as brought thither in y:e
+
said ship''S:t Laurence'', and XXXXXX them the Letter and Invoice and XXX
+
to the ?allon (now shewed unto him this depo:t) and alsoe y:e bill of
+
Lading inder y:e hand of Peter BXXXXXX M:r of the said ship
+
now alsoe shewed unto him remaining in this Court, ?which he
+
knoweth having seene the said first Letters of advise and alsoe
+
these and y:e Invoice and Bill of Lading soe brought in y:e
+
''S:t Laurence'' upon their first bringing to the said M:r Vandeput
+
and havinge now XXXX XXXX Exhibited and remaining in the
+
Court hee well knoweth them to be the same that were soe received
+
by M:r Vandeput, and pticularly by a note or marke made upon
+
the letter by him this depo:t, And further hee cannot depose
+
 
+
To the 8:th arle hee saith that the said ship the ''S:t Laurence'' being on
+
her
+
course from y:e Canaryes, seized and brought unto Plymouth was
+
afterwards brought thence to this port of London, together with the
+
said silver in question, ?which silver y:e said M:r Vandeput here
+
received
+
 
+
To the 9:th arle hee saith that by the Letters and transactions that XXXXX
+
the said producent  XXX y:e said M:r Vandeput touching y:e said XXXXX
+
w:ch hee hath seene hee verily beleeveth the same to be for y:e ?sole account
+
of/
+
----
+
P1110315 f. 57 verso & f. 58 recto
+
 
+
'''Unreadable digital image'''
+
----
+
P1110316 f. 57 verso
+
 
+
'''So-so digital image'''
+
 
+
//of the said producent, and to be ?provided and laden for his Account
+
without that any Spaniard of subject of y:e King of Spaine XXXX
+
time of Lading or seizing or since ?may XXX therein whereXXXXX
+
 
+
To the 10:th hee saith there was the time arlate by ?Comon XXXXX
+
peace and Amity betwixt the Comonwealth and that if Spaine  and XXX
+
y:e respective subjects of the said XXXXXXXXX
+
 
+
To the last hee saith his foregoeing ?deponent XXXX is true
+
 
+
To the Interres
+
 
+
To the first hee saith hee cometh to Testify in this Cause  XX the
+
order of the producents proctor & otherwise negatively
+
 
+
To the 2:nd hee saith hee was never at Genoa nor XXXXX y:e XXXX
+
nor knoweth his father or mother and other wise hee cannoz ?answere
+
saving as aforesaid
+
 
+
To the 3:d hee saith hee doth not knowe any of y:e name of Stephen
+
Palladacino other XXXX the said producent, XXXXXX hee referreth him
+
to his foregoeing Depn and saving y:e same cannot further answer
+
 
+
To the 4:th, hee saith hee referreth himselfe to his foregoing depon &
+
cannot further answer saving hee knoweth that the said XXXX
+
XX XXXX pson for whose account the said other parcells of silver XX
+
XXXX & this ?inquisition) was sent to the said M:r Vandeput XXX
+
they XXXXfrom y:e same factor and in y:e same XXX & XXXXX
+
in y:e same XXXXX.
+
 
+
To the 5:th arle hee saith that hee doth not psonally knowe the sayd
+
Don Luis Perez de Vittoria the ffactor of y:e said ?Pallavacino, XXXX
+
what countryman nor whose subject hee is nor knoweth hee XX
+
beleeveth that the said Don Luiz in any of XX XXX that this XXX
+
hath?dwelt with the said M:r Vandeput XXX hath bin a ?Gent XXXX
+
yeeres last) XXXX sent aor consigned any silver to the said M:r
+
Vandeput for the said Don Luis his XXXX account, nor any for y:e
+
account of any Spaniards. And further hee cannot answer
+
saving as aforesaid.
+
 
+
To the 6:th he referreth himselfe to his foregoing depon and
+
further cannot answer saving negatively for his part
+
 
+
To the last negatively for his pt saving as aforesaid
+
 
+
ABRAHAM ?CABDELJAN ?Jun:r  [His signature]
+
 
+
Deposed XXXXX two Judges in Court
+
 
+
<nowiki>****************************************************</nowiki>
+
===Case: Claim of Stephen ?Pallavacio, of Genoa, regarding silver bars: Deposition: 3.  John Lewis: Date: January 29th, 1658===
+
 
+
//The 29:th of January 1660.
+
 
+
Examinat ?ex parte for XXX XXXXX.
+
 
+
JOHN LEWIS of the parish of S:t Dunstans XXXX East ?India
+
Merchant aged 47 yeeres or therabouts sworne and XXXXX
+
 
+
To the first second and third articles of the said allegaccon hee saith and
+
deposeth that hee may knoweth the producent Stephen PaXXXXXX
+
and hath XX XXX for a ?dozen or fourteene yeeres last or thereabouts
+
and XXXX XXX to XXXX XXXX by meanes of the XXXXXXX dwelling in the
+
citie of Genoa (the ?place of the said producents ?birth
+
and XXXX) and keeping house there and trading ther as a merchant
+
from the yeere 1644 to the yeere 1656, during w:ch tyme hee was
+
well acquianted w;th the said producent Stephen Pallavacino and
+
XXX his the said Stephens father living in the said citie. And for a
+
XXXX//
+
----
+
P1110318 f. 58 verso
+
 
+
'''Poor quality digital image: REIMAGE THIS PAGE'''
+
 
+
//Genoese by birth and extraction and a subect of the stat eof XXXX XX
+
the said Stephen Pallavacino was and is XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
+
And saith that for all the said time of this deponents said dwelling in Genoa
+
the said producent of this deponents XXXX XXX knolwedge dwellt and ?kept
+
house and familie there and that hee was and is XXX of the XXXXX of XXXXX
+
soe commonly accompted: And saith that the said producent was and is
+
a merchant of very greate account and dealing and estste and of ?such
+
wealth that hee is estimated to be worth one ?hundred thousand pounds sterling,
+
and saith that the said producent was XXXXX this deoinet XX XXX XXX
+
because very greate quantities XXXX XXX XXX (of this deponents XXX XXXX
+
knowledge)  for the XXXX account of the sais producen XXXXX
+
XXXXX of greate account and dealing in XXX, XXXXX hath XXXX
+
pXXXXX XXX and is commonly accompted and reputed and further
+
hee deposeth not
+
 
+
Ro XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
+
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
+
 
+
To the Interries
+
 
+
To the first hee saith hee was XXXX unto by M:r XXXX the XXXX
+
and deposed to come and XXXX what he knowes  as XX XXXX, and
+
to the rest hee answreth XXXX XXX XX, and otherwise ?cannot answer,
+
 
+
To trhe second hee saith and deposeth and XXXX XXX from XXXXX XXX
+
December 1656,  and there XXX XXXX XStephen Pallavacino XXXX before
+
this deponent had XXX XXXX, and this deponent did XXX XXX that
+
said producents XXXX. And otherwise referreth himselfe to XXX XXX
+
before  deposed.
+
 
+
To the third hee saith hee knoweth and XXXXX XXX in XXXX arlate
+
name is alsoe Stephen Pallavacino, who alsoe was XX XXXX of XXXXX
+
XXXX of this deponents said dwelling there, and a XXXXXXXXXXXXX
+
XXXXX, and was
+
XXXX the XXX of the oredeposed Stephen
+
XXXX producent
+
this deponent doth not knowezj
+
?before
+
did
+
the Merchants of that XXX
+
 
+
To the 4:th XXX
+
 
+
To the 5:th XXXX
+
 
+
To the last XXXX
+
 
+
JO LEWIS [His signature]
+
 
+
Repeated before
+
XXXXX
+
 
+
<nowiki>*******************************************************</nowiki>
+
===Case: XXXX: Deposition: 1. Domingo de a Seida, of London, Merchant, aged 25: Date: January 31st, 1658===
+
 
+
The 31:th day of January 1660
+
 
+
Examined upon an Allon given in on the
+
behalfe of the said XXXX
+
 
+
The Claime of XXX XXXXX)
+
XXXX Merchant of London for)
+
94 pipes of Canary Wines)
+
& other hoods taken in y:e ship y:e)
+
''S:t Laurence'' XXX XXXXX)
+
M:r XXX XXXXXX)
+
 
+
D:r XXXX
+
 
+
1. DOMINGO DE LA SEIDA of London Merch:t
+
aged 25 yeeres or thereabouts sworne
+
and Examined
+
 
+
To the first arle hee saith and deposeth that the arlate Anthony
+
Rodriguez ?RivXXXes is Comonly and generally reputed a XXXX
+
of ffinident in the Kingdome of Portugall, and soe his XXX
+
deponent beleeveth him to bee and XXXX hee XXXXX
+
?To//
+
 
+
----
+
P1110319 f. 59 recto
+
 
+
'''So-so quality digital image'''
+
 
+
//To the: 2:d hee saith hee hath well knowne the said Antonio
+
Rodriguez Robles for theise thirteene fourteene yeeres
+
last past or thereabouts.  and knowe him first Living att
+
Civill in Spaine namely for y:e first yeires of the said time
+
XXXX and thence hee went to the Canaryes, and soe for London
+
and saith that this depot hath lived in London about six yeeres
+
last past, during w:ch space hee hath knowne the sayd
+
Robles to be an Inhabitant, and to be a house keeper
+
in Dukes place London with his ffamily, and that this depo:t
+
lying in y:e same house, and beeing his booke keep
+
is well acquainted w:th his affaires & Transactions
+
----
+
P1110320 verso & recto
+
 
+
'''Unreadable digital image. REIMAGE THESE PAGES'''
+
----
+
P1110321 f. 59 verso
+
 
+
'''Unreadable digital image. REIMAGE THIS PAGE'''
+
----
+
P1110322 f. 60 recto
+
 
+
'''High quality digital image'''
+
----
+
P1110323 f. 60 verso & f. 61 recto
+
 
+
'''Unreadable digital image. REIMAGE THESE PAGES'''
+
----
+
P1110324 f. 60 verso
+
 
+
'''Poor quality digital image: REIMAGE THIS PAGE'''
+
----
+
P1110325 f. 61 recto
+
 
+
'''High quality digital image'''
+
----
+
P1110326 f. 61 verso & f. 62 recto
+
 
+
'''Unreadable digital image. REIMAGE THESE PAGES'''
+
----
+
P1110327 f. 61 verso
+
 
+
'''Poor quality digital image: REIMAGE THIS PAGE'''
+
----
+
P1110328 f. 62 recto
+
 
+
'''High quality digital image'''
+
----
+
P1110329 f. 62 verso & f. 63 recto
+
----
+
P1110330 f. 62 verso
+
 
+
'''Poor quality digital image: REIMAGE THIS PAGE'''
+
----
+
P1110331 f. 63 recto
+
 
+
'''High quality digital image'''
+
----
+
P1110332 verso
+
 
+
'''Poor quality digital image: REIMAGE THIS PAGE'''
+
 
+
----
+
P1110333 f. 69 recto
+
 
+
'''Good quality digital image'''
+
 
+
===Case: Maurice Thompson, Thomas Canham, Christofer Willoughby, John Page et al v. the Dutch East India Company: Deposition: 1. Henry Dacres, of London, Merchant, aged 34: Date: January 31st, 1658===
+
 
+
//E:E:
+
 
+
A business of examining of witnesses on the)
+
XXXX of Maurice Thompson, Thomas CanXXXX)
+
Christofer Willoughby John Page and others,)
+
Merchants of London, freighters of the shipp
+
the ''Jonathan'', ag:t the Dutch East India)
+
Company in pticular and all others in genall)
+
 
+
Smith
+
 
+
Ro.
+
 
+
The 11:th of ffeburary 1658
+
 
+
Examinands upon an allon given in  on the
+
behalf of the said M:r Thompson and others
+
 
+
1.  HENRY DACRES of London Marchant aged
+
34 yeeres or thereabouts sworne  in the said
+
Court of the Admiraltie of England, saith and
+
deposeth as followth vizt.
+
 
+
To the fifth article of the said allon XXXX and deposeth that hee well
+
knoweth all the producents vizt Maurcie Thompson THomas
+
CaXtian, Cristofer Willoughby, John Page and company arlate and saith
+
they were the XXXX arlate of the yeere 1656 XXX others and Imployers
+
of the said shipp the ''Jonathan'' and XXX hee can from this XXX on a
+
trading voyage for sevrall parts and places of the East Indias, and
+
there to retourne for England on and for their proper account
+
w:ch hee knoweth for that hee was acquainted with and XXX XXXX at
+
such XXXXX XXXX and were supra cargo in thesaid shipp the said voyage
+
 
+
To the second article hee saith that within the  foresaid time namely in
+
and about the moneth of January 1656 the said shipp the ''Jonathan''
+
being in the parts of the East Indies and quietly trading there had aboard her
+
greate quantities of goods and merchandizes for the use and account of the
+
said Maurice Thompson and company aforesaid w:ch XXXXhad  taken  in
+
on the coast of Coromandel and w:ch they were carrying to Bantam,
+
for w:ch place of BantamXXX the said XXX were proper and not for
+
any other part or place thereabouts to be bartered away, and eben
+
XXXXX XXXX and provided for Bantam, where they were to be sold
+
and bartered away for such XXXX as were then to be head and ?procured
+
for the most advantage of the said producents, w:ch hee knowes for that
+
hee was supra cargo aforesaid and the person there ?carryed the said goods to
+
be taken in and was in person XXX with them in the said shipp for
+
Bantam.
+
 
+
To the third and 4 articles hee saith that in or about the  said moneth of January
+
1656 (old stile) the said shipp in her course of prceeding from the
+
said coast for Bantam, coming neere the Island of Pulliayanjan within
+
five leagues or lesse distance of the Road of Bantam, was met wizj
+
and set upon by five XXX of dutch shipps, in the XXX XX neare of the
+
East India company of the United Netherlands, and that upon their haling
+
and demanding XXXX that shipp (Speaking of the ''Jonathan'') over and
+
XXXX bound, and XXXX XXXX XXX sewall of England, came from
+
Cormandel bound wth  XXX for Bantam, thet of the dutch shipps
+
XXXX and told the master and company of the ''Jonathan'' that they must
+
not nos could run into Bantam, and that they lay there on purpose to
+
oppose them or any other shipps of England that should endeavour to run into
+
Bantam, for w:ch (as they XXX) they had order from the Generall of the sd dutch East India
+
company XXXX was XXX and heard the XXX
+
 
+
To the fifth and sixth 7. 8 and 9:th articles hee saith that the master and company of the
+
''Jonathan'' finding this XXXXX of the dutch, fairly and earnestly instructed
+
XXXXXX of the dutch commanders to goe in, and desired them to XXXX or
+
send aboard the ''Jonathan'' and XXX her assuring them XXXX XX
+
any XXXder, XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
+
aboard//
+
----
+
P1110334 verso & recto
+
 
+
'''Unreadable digital image: REIMAGE THESE PAGES'''
+
 
+
----
+
P1110335 verso
+
 
+
'''High quality digital image'''
+
 
+
//aboard, XX XXXX of XXX the sd dutch XXXXX ?Daniell
+
this deponent ?fell to intreate them  XXXXX to order
+
XXX in, telling them (as XXX truly was) that thay ?durst seek XXX
+
XXXX persons aboard, and XXXX greate necessitie of their ?going
+
XX the XXX In XXX victuakks and reXXX under for  their part
+
and to XXX their trading XXXXX, and the dutch still suspitious
+
within XXXX, the ''Jonathan'' endeavoured to put in, XXXXX they of
+
?othr dutch shipps sett on her, and XXX XXXX the
+
master of the ''Jonathan'' and this deponent XX XXXX to XXX XXXX
+
thereXXXX to search them if they came XXX XXXXX to such XXXX
+
XXX this deponent (the master XXX sick) went aboard to their
+
Admirall and told him and ?modestly expostulated with him the XXXX
+
 
+
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110336 f. 70 recto
+
 
+
'''So-so quality digital image'''
+
 
+
===Case: Maurice Thompson, Thomas Canham, Christofer Willoughby, John Page et al v. the Dutch East India Company: Deposition: 2. William Stephen, of Limehouse, Marriner, formerly masters Mate of the Jonathan: Date: January 31st, 1658===
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
 
+
XX
+
 
+
2. WILLIAM STEPHEN of Limehouse Marriner late
+
masters mate of the shipp the ''Jonathan'' (Robert
+
Graves com:der) aged 28 yeares or therabouts
+
sworne and examined
+
 
+
To the first article of the said allon hee saith and deposeth that
+
hee well knoweth the producents Maurice Thompson, Thomas Canham
+
and Christofer Willoughbie and saith that they and XXX XX were the
+
shipp the ''Jonathan'', and imployed and sent her out on a merchandizing
+
voyage from this port for the East Indies and places thereabouts for
+
their proper account, and they upon their account XXX XXX XX XXXXX
+
by her said Merchandizing imployment to this XXX, w:ch hee knoweth
+
being Master Mate of her the said voyage, and going the voyage
+
 
+
To the second article hee saith and deposeth that within the said XXXX
+
moneths in or about the moneth of January 1656 XX XXX XXX XXXXXX
+
trading in the parts of East India, and had aboard her XX XXXXXX
+
quantitie of goods and merchandizes w:ch were for the said account
+
XX XXXXX in the coast of Coromandell, and were to be transported
+
XXX, as were proper for Bantam trade and what ?Returne, and
+
XXXX to XXX ptended and XXXX with XXXXX to be XXXX to
+
Bantam and there delivered, and the said commander & company
+
XXX carrying her said goods in the said shipp for Bantam where thee
+
XXX were to be traded and bartered for the ?traffic an accompt
+
of the said Imployers of the said shipp, w:ch hee knoweth for the reason
+
aforesaid
+
 
+
To the third and fourth fifth and 6:th articles hee saith that XX that the said XXX
+
 
+
'''Rest of this digital imaged page is impossible to read'''
+
----
+
P1110337 verso & recto
+
 
+
'''Unreadable digital image: REIMAGE THESE PAGES'''
+
----
+
P1110338 f. 70 verso
+
 
+
'''Reasonable quality digital image'''
+
 
+
//the ''Jonathan'' as aforesaid that ?then was bound for Bantam ?told
+
them plainly that they might XX XX should for in thither XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX And XXXX
+
to come to an anchor XXX the Admirall , his precontest being XXXX
+
wXXX aboard the dutch Admirall, and upon his retourme aboard the
+
''Jonathan'' declared the XXX Admirall, and expressly forbidden and
+
?prohibited their going in to Bantam, and had declared that if they and XXXXXX to goe in
+
hee would sink them in ?that effort, and thereupon the said M:r Dacres being
+
supra cargo or merchant of the ''Jonathan'' under a protest against such their
+
hinderance by the dutch. All w:ch hee knoweth being present aboard
+
the ''Jonathan''.  And further deposeth not.
+
?9:th article of the said allon hee saith and deposeth that
+
the said shipp the ''Jonathan'' being XX prohinited and hindered by the dutch
+
from going into Bantam to w:ch hee was XX XXXX with her said XXXX
+
was XXX and to depose and goe to other places for w:ch ?ther goods
+
were not proper and to w:ch they were not designed, and there to barter
+
and XXXX them away, to the great losse and damage of the said
+
imployers in respect of what the ?prisses would have bin if thesaid goods
+
hath nin XXX to an delivered at Bantam accordinge as they were designed
+
 
+
To the tenth hee saith that by the said hinarance and prohibition of the
+
dutch the said Imployers have suffered greate losse and dammagem, but
+
the valew thereof hee cannot as hee saith estimate
+
 
+
W:M STEPHENS [His signature]
+
 
+
Repeated with his ?precontest before
+
Dr Godolphon.
+
 
+
<nowiki>**********************************************************</nowiki>
+
===Case: Maurice Thompson, Thomas Canham, Christofer Willoughby, John Page et al v. the Dutch East India Company: Deposition: 3. Alexander Prescott, of London, Merchant, aged 27: Date: ffebruary 17th, 1658===
+
 
+
//The 17th of ffebruray 1658
+
 
+
Examined upon the fore said allegaccon
+
 
+
3. ALEXANDER PRESCOTT of London Marchant aged 27 yeeres or
+
thereabouts sworne and examined.
+
 
+
To the first and second articles hee saith and deposeth That hee very well
+
knoweth the procudents Maurice Thompsom, Thomas Canham, Christofer
+
Willoughby, John Page and company aclate and saith they were in and for
+
all the monthes arlate of the yeere 1656 XXXXX and Imployers of the
+
shipp the ''Jonathan'' arlate (Robert GXXXXX commander) as a trading  or merchandizing voyage from England to the parts of East India in XXXXX was XX retourne for England for their use and accompt, and saith that in
+
January XXX was ?two ?yeers the said shipp being quietly trading in the said
+
parts, and having aboard her a quantitie of marchandizes consisting in XX
+
cottons and callicos XX XXX XXX factor XXX account taken aboard her on the coast
+
of Cormandel was carrying XX XXX for Bantam for w:ch place the said goods were
+
XXXX and were provided XXXXX to be ther XXXXXX and XXXXXXX
+
and not for XXXXX to be disbursed XX XXX XXXXXX nir XXX XXXX XX
+
XXX XX XXXX soe XXXXX to her said ?merchants as XX Bantam, w:ch hee
+
knoweth  being burser of the said shipp and goeing the said voyage from place to
+
place in her, being alsoe XXXX X XXX XXX XXX XXXX of the, XX XXX
+
 
+
To the third and fourth articles hee saidth and deposeth that the said shipp XXXXX
+
XX XX her course from the said coast for Bantam and XX XXXXX Island
+
of Pulliaayanjan about  XXX XX XXX leagues distance from Bantam XXX
+
XXXX XXX XXXX of dutch shipps (w:ch wer in the service and Imployment
+
of the dutch East India company) XXX, saving that one of them XX
+
them XXXX, and XXX XXXX XXX along with XXX XXXXX, and saith XXXX
+
XXXX//
+
----
+
P1110339 f. 71 recto
+
 
+
'''High quality digital image'''
+
 
+
//the ''Jonathan'' XXXXing a XXXX XXXXX under the said XXXXX XXXX XXX to goe into
+
Bantam the next day, the said dutch shipp  XXXX XXXXX the said
+
other foure dutch shipps riding also neere, and the next morning the ''Jonathan''
+
XXX XXXX to goe into Bantam the said dutch shipps boat ?came aboard  XXXX
+
Bantam, for the dutch had ?warrs with the Bantamers and the said
+
sutch shipps lay there XXX XXXX to hinder all shipps from going in,
+
having order from their Generall ?intendeant, and being authorised that they
+
of the XXXXXX were bound to XXX in them their merchandizing designe, and therewith all
+
XXXX to XXX in, the skipper of the said dutch shipp aboard the ''Jonathan''
+
called out to those aboard the said dutch shipp to fire at the ''?Jonathan'', and
+
they thereupon XXXX a XXX XX the ''Jonathan'', and then the ''Jonathan'' being commanded
+
 
+
to come close to their Admirall,
+
 
+
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
+
----
+
===Case: Rowland Hill John Hill and Company own:rs of the Oporto Merchant vs. Sir James Drax et al: Deposition: 1. Thomas Chevers, of Limehouse, Stepney, Mariner, Master of the Oporto Merchant, aged 28: Date: March 9th 1658===
+
 
+
P1110346 f. 92 recto
+
 
+
//The 9:th day of March 1658
+
 
+
Rowland Hill John Hill and Company own:rs of)
+
the ''Oporto Merchant''.  Thomas Chevers M:r)
+
ag:t S:r James Drax Knight Richard ?Huggins Tho:)
+
?Kendall, James ?Wyck and Robert Welding)
+
Merchants in particular and all others in)
+
Generall that have or p:rtend  to have any
+
rights, Titles, or interest in y:e goods wares and
+
Merchandizes lately brought in y:e sayd ship)
+
to this port from y:e Barbadoes in a Cause
+
of Damage and average.  Suckley.
+
 
+
Rp
+
 
+
1.  THOMAS CHEVERS
+
of Limehouse in the
+
parish of Stepney
+
Mariner, M:r of the
+
ship the ''Oporto Merchant''
+
aged 28 yeeres or thereabouts
+
sworne and Examined.
+
 
+
To the first arle of the said Allon hee saith that hee hath well
+
knowne y:e arlate y:e ship the ''Opoto Merchant'' whereof this depo:t
+
is nowe M:r for about Twelve monethes last, and well
+
knoweth that y:e arlate Rowland Hill John Hill, and XX
+
Hopegood and Company for all y:e ?same time
+
were the true and lawfull owners and proprieto:rs of the
+
said ship and of her tackle Apparell, and furniture,
+
and for such being XX accounted and reputed: And further
+
hee cannot depose.
+
 
+
To the second hee saith the said ship the ''Oporto Merchant'' in
+
her course from Barbadoes to this port of London
+
?Laden with Sugars Cotton and Indico and other Comodityes
+
for the account of y:e arlate S:r James Drax Richard  XXXXX
+
Thomas Kendall James Wyck Robt ?Weeking & others did meete
+
with neere the fflowers and Calves, on or about the
+
twentieth day of January last a greate and violente storme
+
w:ch did soe continue for about sixteene houres, the
+
winde being then at West, And y:e said ship running
+
before the sea, under ?her foresaile, the said ships ?stern
+
gave way, and this depo:t and Company were forced
+
to ?haul the said foresaile of the said ship, and lye under
+
a ?mizen, And saith that y:e seas being very high brake
+
the said ships Tiller, w:ch did much endanger y:e ?keeper the
+
said ships Rudder, and ?Sterne part; And at the XXXX
+
part (OR, port) hee saith the said ship, shipped under water w:ch came
+
into y:e hold of y:e sd ship, And y:e weather being very
+
Tempestuous, and y:e violent winde continueing, y:e said
+
ships ?Missen saile was blowne away, and lost, and by
+
Meanes of looseing y:e Misen, y:e said ship lay broad XXX
+
to the sea, and by reason thereof shipped a very violent sea
+
w:ch washed overboard And ?Sheats Anchor, and the long boate
+
and//
+
----
+
P1110340 f. 71 verso & f. 72 recto
+
 
+
'''High quality image'''
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110341 f. 71 verso
+
 
+
'''So-so quality digital image: REIMAGE PAGE'''
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110342 f. 72 recto
+
 
+
'''High quality digital image'''
+
 
+
<nowiki>**************************************</nowiki>
+
===Case: Lord Protector ag:t the Hope: Deposition: 5.  Peter Aylward, of London, Merchant, aged 40: Date: February 21st 1658 (59)===
+
 
+
//The 21:th of ffebruary 1658
+
 
+
Lord Protector ag:t. the ''Hope''.)
+
aforesaid.)
+
 
+
5  PETER AYLWARD of London Merchant, aged 40 yeeres or
+
thereabouts sworne and examined as aforesaid
+
 
+
To the first second and third Interries hee saith and deposeth that in or about June
+
last was a twelve moneth M:r John Page one of the Merchants concerned in
+
this busines, having with his associates a designe in hand to send a shipp from
+
Amsterdam for the West Indies to trade for their account upon the coasts of
+
the Spaniards, and understanding that this deponent understood both the Spanish
+
and dutch tongues (besides English) and could speake them, and alsoe
+
understood the busines of traffique and XXXXX as a marchant treated and
+
agred with this deponent to goe the said voyage for five pounds per
+
moneth wages and XXXX for XXX goods for his owne account, wherein hee
+
this deponent was to give assistajce to John Lo?pes his ?precontest who was alsoe then XXX
+
and being XX hired this deponent was XX XXX XXXXX in a dutch shipp called the
+
?''Mackerell'' bound for Amsterdam and concerned with him in the said shipp XXXXX,
+
perpetuanas, ?hatts, and many other particulars of goods w:ch were here ?provided by the
+
said M:r Page and XXXX ffernandez, M:r ?Robles, M:r Jenkin and M:r ?Painter
+
Merchants of this citie, to be at Amsterdam put aboard such a shipp
+
as could be provided for that XXXX and voyage.  And YYYing to Amsterdam
+
the shipp the ?''HoyX'' interrogate was by order of their said Imployers and by
+
their partners at Amsterdam John Tilly and John ?XXnterwell and XXX
+
of XXXXX (as hee tooke them to be) who XXX XXX was but XXXX XXXXXX
+
?expresslly  reputed at Amsterdam about w:ch buying this deponent ?eyther
+
with the said John ?Hoyer and Patrick ?Betts (who were alsoe come over from
+
England in the ?same designe) were ?employed, and saith  XX ?cost ?answere
+
XXXXXX fourXXX hundred gilders or thereabouts.  And saith
+
?the//
+
----
+
P1110343 f. 72 verso & f. 73 recto
+
 
+
'''Unreadable quality digital image: REIMAGE THESE PAGES'''
+
 
+
----
+
P1110344 f. 72 verso
+
 
+
'''Reasonable quality digital image'''
+
 
+
//the said shipp being so bought and procured for the said voyage, the said goods
+
?be carried from England were laded aboard her, together with XXXXX
+
Wines and other goods and XXXXX provided in Holland, and this lading
+
being XXXXX, the said shipp departed from Amsterdam therewith in September
+
last was a twelve moneth bound for the West Indies, not being limited
+
to any particular XXX, but left to the discretion of the said John ?Lopez
+
with the advise of this ?deponent to manage the voyage in XXXX parte to the
+
best advantage of her said Imployers, of w:ch hee saith M:r Page, M:r PXXXXX
+
and M:r Dunkin are English men and ?Inhabitating XXXXXX of this ?citie
+
M:r ?Antonio ffernandez Caravajall, and M:r Antonio Rodriguez Robles alsoe
+
merchants of this citie and reputed Portugueses, XXX M:r ffernandez is XXX
+
?indenizened, John Tilly an Irishman borne but living in Amsterdam
+
where alsoe liveth the said John ?CXXXXXXnet, who hath formerly lived
+
long in London, but whose countrey man he is this deponent knoweth not-
+
And saith the said shipp from Amsterdam went directly to the Island of
+
Trinidad, and was there ?Registred and entred as a Spanish shipp, and
+
thereby and by presents to the Gouvernor and others (XXX  w:ch XXXX  goods
+
were there sold) XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX lived and XXXXXX for prattique XX
+
the Spanish XXXX in those parts, and being therewith furnished she departed
+
in or about November 1657 to ?Comana a coast on the terra firma and
+
there sold to the valew XXX XXXX of a XXX XXXX peeces of XXXX of her goods
+
and received the money for the XXXX and then went to ?TranXille, and
+
there sold ?of her said outwards cargo for about XXXXX XXX and ?peeces of
+
eight, and leaveing the money ?ther, XXXXXX further into the
+
Gulfe of Honduras and there sold and ?tucked away all the rest of
+
said goods, and there tooke in three hundred eightie three XXXX or thereabouts
+
of Indico (saving that XXX or XXXX of those XXXXXX XXXX XXXX druggs) and
+
eleaven XXXX of ?Indico and a XXX XXXX or XXXXXccos and two barreles of druggs
+
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX eleaven hundred and twelve XXXXX or thereabouts of SafsayXXXlla, and  fowre
+
hundred seaventie six XXXes, or therabouts, w:th safXXXXXlla and hides
+
were the pcured of the said moneys so left ashore at  TurXXXlle at the
+
said time of the said shipps first XXXX there, All w:ch goods she received
+
in a XXX InXXXX were the goods of and laded for the XXX account of
+
the aforenamed Imployers Antonio ffernandes Caravajall, Antonio Rodriques
+
Rubles, M:r Pain?ter, M:r Page, M:r Dunkin, M:r Tilly and ;:r ChamberXXXX
+
and provided wuth their effects, saving that of her said lading ?soe taken in
+
at the West Indies, twelve chests and twro thirds of a chest of the said Indico were  provided by and
+
laded for this deponents owne account, and that hee hath ?two of his owne shipp
+
?chests w:ch are full of druggs for his owne account, and that of the said
+
SasaXXXlla sixteene XXXXX were provided by and laded by his precontest
+
?Toribia ffernandez for his owne account, and that this deponent ?bought ?them
+
afterwards of him, and that the said ?Betts hath twenty chests and a third of a chest of the  fore said
+
Indico for his account, and his owne chest full of druggs, And
+
saith that this deponent is a subiect of this Commonwealth and hath
+
lived tenn yeares and bin married and a XXX ?lodger XXXX yeares in this
+
?nation, five yeeres whereof hee lived in three tunne alley neere ?Moregate
+
and now liveth in Leadenhall streete over againstXXXXXX, and hath
+
loved XXXXXXX XXXX, but is an Irish man borne, and soe
+
is the said Betts, who hath lived in London for all the said time of this
+
deponents dwelling there, and (as hee hath heard) for tenn yeered before ?and
+
XXXX an Apprenticeshipp here to a Mariner.  And further that the said
+
shipp departed from TXXXille aforesaid with ?intent to come and stop at
+
Dover or Deale wh?ence this deponent or the said ?Loyas were XXXX XXXX to
+
their said Imployers in this reXXX to receive orders aXXXX diXXXXXX, But
+
by//
+
----
+
P1110345 f. 73 recto
+
 
+
'''Poor quality digital image: REIMAGE THIS PAGE'''
+
 
+
//by XXX XXXX was
+
In ?Milford
+
 
+
To thefourth fifth and sixth hee saith that the said Bets XXXyed the
+
XXXX XXX and was by the said Imployers XXX master of the said vessell
+
and was so to appeare untill her comming to the West Indies, XXXX
+
shee met with any ffrenchmen ?outwards XX XXX, in w:ch case Jerome XXXX
+
a dutch man (put in purposely therefore) was to appeare master of her
+
but in the West Indies John Lopes was to appeare Commander and XXXX
+
XXXX, and XXXX to doe all for his owne account, and saith their Instructions
+
were verball and not in writing, saving that M:r Tilly gave them a paper
+
belonging to the dutch) and that she belonged to the dutch West India
+
Company, w:ch paper the said Jerome was to show in case of meeting
+
with Spaniards, and in his custody XX was and was as XXXXX written in dutch.  ?And
+
saith they had Invoices XXX of their outwards and XXXXwards goods XX
+
XXbills of lading  or charterpartie, w:ch Invoices were in the XXXXXX
+
of here said M:r XXXXX, who (as hee supposeth) brought them to London.  And
+
saith that while shee rode in Milford havem, being an XXXX harboure, and
+
a shipp appearing (whome they suspected to be an Ostender) but proved
+
a Dutch?man ?of ?warre) this deponent desired that the English Invoices might
+
be hidd, w:ch was accordingly XXXXXX, but after when appeared to
+
be a Rotterdammer, they were taken in and were brought XXXXX,
+
and XXXXX thatm hee knoweth not of any ?hat
+
were hided, nor knowe there any XXX
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110346 f. 92 recto
+
 
+
'''Poor quality digital image: REIMAGE THIS PAGE'''
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
 
+
----
+
P1110347 f. 92 verso & f. 93 recto
+
 
+
'''Unreadable quality digital image: REIMAGE THESE PAGES'''
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110348 f. 92 verso
+
 
+
'''High quality digital image'''
+
 
+
//and skiffe: y:t were fastned to y:e sd ships Deck were XXXX
+
to Leeward, and with the goeing oberboard of the said XXX
+
w:ch hunge to the said ship by y:e Rope to w.ch it was fast was XXX
+
and by y:e said ships Rowlings it bilged a hole in y:e XXXX
+
of the said ship, through w:ch hole; and other places in y:e sd ships side w:ch were XX by violence of the XXXX
+
Insoemuch that there was in a short time foure foote
+
and a halfe of water in her hold, w:ch caused y:e said XXX
+
to lye dead in y:e sea; And saith that the said ships lading XXX
+
and Company onboard. by reason long XXXXXX of the said ?Extreme
+
Stormy and windy weather, were all in greate danger
+
of Sinking and perishing in the sea.  And further ?deposeth
+
that this depo:t and Company on board y:e said ship did
+
upon good advice Consideraccon, and Consultaccon, for y:e
+
prservaccon of the said ship and Lading, and their owne
+
Lives. Cut downe y:e maine mast. by the board. and cut
+
away. y:e Ropes and Tackling thereto belonging,
+
and did stave and cast over board most
+
of their caskes with fresh waterm And were for y:e preservaccon of their shipp XXXX XXXto cut their foresaid XXX Anchor, and main XXX
+
and tackling thereto belonging, and all and singular
+
the Tackle Apparrell funiture and things belonging
+
to the said ship y:e ''Oporto Merchant'' . mentionedd and
+
set downe in the Schedule annexed to y:e said Allon
+
(now seene and read over by this depo:t) and y:e said Tackle
+
and things therein set downe. were at the tome of
+
their said Cutting and Casting away and loosing
+
well worth the severall summes set downe in y:e said schedule
+
for y:e same, amounting in y:e whole to the summe of One hundred
+
fourty two pounds two shillings sterling.  And saith. that by
+
the violence of y:e said Storme y:e said mizen saile was blown
+
away and Lost w:ch was then worth four pounds, and y:e stern
+
poast Rudder and sterne of the said Shipp. were by y:e same
+
meanes much damnifyed to the vallue of about twenty
+
pounds: The premisses hee Deposeth being M:r of the said
+
Ship, and on board her y:e foresaid time, and an Eye witness
+
of the same And further hee cannot depose.
+
 
+
To the 4:th and 5:th (sic) hee saith that during all the time the
+
said Storme Continued, and after wards, this depo:t and
+
All his Company did Constantly keepe both the
+
pumpes goeing, and y:e water increasing they were CCCC
+
to bring y;e said Ships starboard side to the sea, and then XXX
+
said Ship being XXred, or turned, her spritsaile was XXX
+
away, by y:e violence of the said Storme, and in y:e morning of
+
the 21:th day of January last, y:e Said Storme abated And
+
XXX//
+
----
+
P1110349 f. 93 recto
+
 
+
'''Good quality digital image'''
+
 
+
//Depo:t and Company did with much Carepaines & Dilligence
+
stop the said hole made by the said ?sheat Anchor, and, freed
+
her of the water, w:ch shee had received in at the the said Hold
+
and at other places. as aforesaid. and saith that when the
+
said ship departed from y:e Barbadoes, and untill y:e said
+
storme came and happened the said ship was strong
+
strong and Tight, and was well fitted with all manner
+
of necessaryes and materialls for y:e said voyage, and was
+
not over laden, but was able to beare the lLading w:ch was
+
then on board her. and saith her ?sheath Anchor was  well
+
and sufficiently fastened to the side of the said ship; untill
+
the same was washed from y:e same by the said storme,
+
And saith that what dammage did happen to y:e said ship
+
and Lading y:e said time, happened meerely by y:e said
+
tormy and windy weather, and not by any insufficiency
+
in y:e said ship, or any fault of or in this depo:t, or any of his
+
Company. The premises hee Deposeth for the reasons
+
aforesaid: And further cannot Depose.
+
 
+
To the 6:th hee referreth himselfe to the Registry of this Court
+
 
+
To the last hee saith his foregoeing depon is true.
+
 
+
THO CHEVERS  [His signature]
+
 
+
<nowiki>**********************************************</nowiki>
+
===Case: Rowland Hill John Hill and Company own:rs of the Oporto Merchant vs. Sir James Drax et al: Deposition: 2. Richard James, of Limehouse, Boatswaine of the Oporto Merchant, aged 3?8: Date: March 10th 1658===
+
 
+
The Tenth day of March 1658
+
 
+
Examined on the said Allon
+
 
+
Rp
+
 
+
2:nd RICHARD JAMES of Limehouse. Boatswaine
+
of the ship the ''Oporto Merchant'' aged 3?8 yeeres or
+
thereabouts sworne and Examined:
+
 
+
To the first Arle of the said Allon hee saith and deposeth that
+
hee verily beleeveth that the arlate M:r Rowland Hill and Company
+
fo:r theis twelve monethes last, have bin, and at p:rsent are
+
the true & awfull own:rs of the arlate ship y:e ''Oporto
+
Merchant'' (whereof Thomas Cheevers is M:r) and of her tackle &
+
furniture & things belonging unto her, and soe they are Comonly
+
accounted. The premises hee deposeth for that hee hath bin
+
boatswaine of the said ship y:e ''Oporto Merchant'' for about thirteene
+
monethes last, And otherwise cannot depose:
+
 
+
To the second hee saith that y:e said ship y:e ''Oporto Merchant''
+
Coming from y:e Barbadoes Laden with Sugars, Cotton & some Indico
+
for y:e account of S:r James Drax. M:r Wood?ward severall other M:rchants
+
Bound for this Port of London; in her Course ?hether was neere y:e XXXXXXX
+
on or about the twentieth day of January, last, there happened and
+
rose a very great & violent storme; w:ch Continued very violent for
+
about Eight or Tenn houres, the winde being then at West, and
+
saith that for y:e p:rservaccon of the said ship, Lading and men on board
+
her, her Company ranne her before y:e sea, under her ?foreCourse
+
halfe mast high; and which they ranne her soe, her Sterne (OR, Stemme) gave way//
+
----
+
P1110350 f. 93 verso & f. 94 recto
+
 
+
'''Unreadable quality digital image: REIMAGE THESE PAGES'''
+
 
+
----
+
P1110351 f. 93 verso
+
 
+
'''High quality digital image'''
+
 
+
//XXXX, And XXXXXX y:e ?Master and Company of the said
+
ship were foreced to ?hand their foreCourse; or foresaile, and
+
lye under a mizen. and whXXXX shee soe lay. y:e said shipps
+
Tiller was broken by y.e violence of the said Storme, and did
+
much endanger y:e looseing of the Rudder and sterne ?poast
+
of the said ship, and saith that at y:e XXXX port wher
+
her Tiller was broken the said ship receaved much water
+
in her hold, And y:e said very Violent Storme; not abating
+
y.e said ships missen sail, was by the Violence there of XX
+
splitt & Torne; and blowne away, and after it was blowne
+
away, the said ship was by
+
the force and Violence of the said Storme, forced to lye
+
broad off, to the sea, and by that meanes, shipped a greate
+
sea, which washed her boate and skiffe. to Leeward
+
and washed her sheat Anchor over board, and it, hanging
+
to y:e Rope to which it was fastened, and y:e said ship Roling
+
two and againe y:e said Anchor bilged a hole in y:e side of the
+
said ship  just by her Lough, through w:ch. And other places
+
and ?Crozes: there came such Water in hold; soe that
+
her hold, had & receaved in a short space some four and XXXX
+
halfe water, w:ch caused y:e said ship to lye in y:e Sea,
+
without motion; And saith that by reason of trhe Violence
+
and duraccon of the said Storme; both the said ship Lading
+
and all the Company on board her were in great
+
danger of persihing in y:e Sea. This hee deposeth for that
+
hee was Boatswaine of and on board the said ship at
+
y:e time when y:e sayd Storme happened, and further hee
+
doth not depose.
+
 
+
To the 3:d hee saith that fore said Thomas Cheevers, and Company
+
off and on board the said shipp; in y:e said Storme did  XX
+
upon a seious Consideraccon, for y:e safeguard of the said
+
ship and Lading, and their owne Lives Cut the said ships
+
Mainmast by the board, and Cut away the saile and
+
Rigging, and Tackling thereto belonging, and Cut away
+
her Sheat Anchor, and staved most of the Caskes of water
+
y:t were aboard her, and therby did much Lighten the said
+
Shipp: And having now seene & read y:e Schedule Exhibited hee
+
saith that all and singular y:e Masts, sailes, tackle and
+
funiture & Materialls. therein set downe & Expressed
+
to the said Ship, were and are Uteerly lost by meanes of the said Storme and they were XX
+
, the time of their said Cutting away, and loosing well worth
+
the severall and respective summes of money, set downe in the
+
said schedule for y:e same, in y:e whole amounting to y:e summe
+
of One hundred fourty two pounds two shilllings sterl. XXX
+
that, besides y:e foresaid Damages, there was alsoe (by meanes
+
of the violence of the said Storme,) much hurt and damage//
+
-----
+
P1110352 f. 94 recto
+
 
+
'''So-so quality digital image'''
+
----
+
P1110353 f. 94 verso & f. 95 recto
+
 
+
'''Good quality digital image'''
+
----
+
P1110354 f. 94 verso
+
 
+
'''High quality digital image'''
+
----
+
P1110355 f. 95 recto
+
 
+
'''So-so quality digital image'''
+
----
+
P1110356 f. 95 verso & f. 96 recto
+
 
+
'''Good quality digital image'''
+
----
+
P1110357 f. 95 verso
+
 
+
'''High quality digital image'''
+
-----
+
P1110358 f. 122 recto
+
 
+
'''Reasonable quality digital image'''
+
 
+
===Case: John Swift John Parker John Harris and Company, Owners of the Shipp the 'Lady ffrigott vs. Hippolito Centurione of Genoa and others: Deposition: 1. Laurence Burr, of St Catherines near the Tower, Cooper of the Lady ffrigott, aged 38: Date: June 3rd, 1659===
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110359 f. 122 verso
+
 
+
'''High quality digital image'''
+
 
+
//The 3. of June 1659
+
 
+
A business of examination of witnesses for perpetauall)
+
remembrance of the matter, on the part and behalfe of)
+
John Swift John Parker John Harris and Company)
+
Owners of the Shipp the ''Lady ffrigott'' whereof John)
+
Hosier was Master, and her tackle furniture)
+
apparell & freight, and of Andrew Riccard one)
+
of the Aldermen of the Cittie of London and)
+
Company, the Governor and Company of)
+
English Merchants trading to the Mediterranian (sic))
+
Seas, Owner of the goods in the sayd Shipp)
+
against Hippolito Centurione of Genoa)
+
in pticular and all others in generall which)
+
will take upon them to ?iusifie the seizing or)
+
takeing of the sayd shipp the ''lady ffrigott'')
+
and her ladeing: SXXXXth)
+
 
+
Examined on the allegation given in
+
on the behalfe of the sayd Swift Parker
+
Harris & Company and alsoe the sayd
+
Ricard & Company.
+
 
+
No. 1  LAURENCE BURR of the
+
p:rish of S:t Catherine neere the
+
Tower of London Cooper late Cooper
+
of the ''Lady ffrigott'', aged thirty five
+
yeares or thereabouts a wittnesse
+
sworne and examined saith and
+
deposeth as followeth viz:t.
+
 
+
To the first arle of the sayd allegation hee saith that in the
+
Monethe and tyme arlate 1658 (untill the fowerteenth day of
+
November that yeare on which day shee was seized the arlate
+
John Swift John Harris John Parker and Company all English
+
men and subiects of the Commonwealth of England were, and
+
soe still ought to be the lawfull Owner & Proprietors of the
+
arlate Shipp the ''Lady ffrigott'' and of her tackle apparrell and
+
furniture and for such commonly reputed this hee so better knoweth
+
because hee was & went Cooper of the said shipp the voyage in
+
question and was on board her at her seizure.
+
 
+
To the 2 and 3 arles hee saith that in the yeares & monethes aforesaid the
+
arlate Alderman Riccard & Company Marchants of London
+
did hyre & take to freight and imploye the sayd shipp the ''Lady
+
ffrigott'' upon a tradeing voyage to XXao ?Magaliga and other
+
places beyond the Seas to lade Currans & other goods for their
+
use and Accompt & transport them to & deliver them at London
+
for their use this hee knoweth being Cooper aboard her the sayd
+
voyage And hehreby also knoweth that in the monethe & tyme
+
aforesayd and after the arrivall of the sayd shipp the ''Lady ffrigott''
+
at ?Potrao Roade arlate the ffactors or Agents of the sayd Alderman
+
Ricard & Company put XXX cause to be laden a board the sayd
+
shipp for Account of the sayd Ricard & Company one hundred
+
and sixty tonne of Mahaligo Currans and also divers other
+
goods and a great quantitie of money to be transported therein
+
her for London and there delivered to them or their Agents This hee
+
the better knoweth for that hee helped to lade the sayd Currans and
+
other goods aboard her & brought  some of the sayd moneye aboard &
+
& ?saw the rest brought aboard her And farther to these arles he cannot
+
depose.
+
 
+
To the 4:th 5:th and 6:th arles of the sayd allegation hee saith that the
+
sayd shipp ''Lady ffrigott'' having receaved the sayd lading & money
+
aboard her and being therewith rideing at Anchor in the Roade of
+
Perrao in a peaceable condition, there came into the sayd Roade on the
+
fourteenth day of November 1658 a certaine shipp of about
+
a hundred & fifty tonnes gaving a white Antient in her pXXXX//
+
----
+
P1110360
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
 
+
----
+
P1110361 f. 122 verso
+
 
+
//which shipp shipp (sic) (as this deponent was afterwards informed
+
by XXXX XXXXX an ?Irishman & some others of her company who could speake English) was called
+
the ''S:ta Cruse'' and her Masters name ffrancisco ?Stale and
+
was a Genoa shipp and was there aXXXXdd and sett out
+
by Hippolito Centurione a Genoese, and came ?hence (as this
+
deponent was also by like men XX informed
+
in Company of ?two other men of warr sett out thence
+
also by the sayd Hippolito Centuriane, which Genoa shipp called
+
the ''S:ta Cruse'' presently upon her comming into the Road of Petrao
+
made as if she would have come to an Anchor neere the
+
''Lady ffrigott'', but when shee was come neere her the Captaine
+
& Company of the sayd shipp ''S:ta  Cruse'' did in a violent and
+
hostile manner sett upon the sayd shipp the ''Lady ffrigott'' with
+
Swords & gunnes and other warlike Instruments and
+
wounded the Captaine & six or seaven men of the Company pf the
+
''Lady ffrigott'' & by that meanes surprized her & her sayd ladeing
+
of Currans and other goods & money & dispoiled their Owners
+
of them & converted them to their owne use And hee farther saith
+
that hee this deponent was alsoe informed by a dutch man who was
+
gunner of the sayd shipp ''S:ta Cruse'' & an Irish man who was one of
+
her Company who could both speake very good English that the Captaine
+
of the ''S:ta Cruse'' had  taken severall mariners & souldiers out
+
of the sayd two other shipps of warr which came in Company
+
of the ''Sta Cruse'' from Genoa, the better to enable them to surprise
+
the ''Lady ffrigott'' and her ladeing, And saith that at the tyme of
+
the sayd seizure hee did observe that most of the ''S:ta Cruse'' her
+
Company who made the seizure were Italians & Genoeses And
+
saith that after the says Genoeses preceived that the sayd dutch
+
Gunner & the french man & others of their Company coulde speake
+
English and had some conference with this deponent and
+
others of the ''Lady ffrigotts'' Company who were seized, they did
+
forbid them to have any discourse with the English; and put the
+
''Lady ffrigotts'' Company in ?hold & kept them there in Irons And
+
further to these arles hee cannot depose
+
 
+
To the 7:th arle hee saith that hee this deponent and severall
+
other of the ''Lady ffrigotts'' Company were after their surprizall
+
?told & informed by the sayd dutch Gunner & the sayd Irish man
+
and some other of the ''S:ta Cruse'' her Company who could speake
+
English that the ''S:ta Cruse'' was sett out from Genoa by the
+
sayd Hippolito Centurone upon a warlike designe against the
+
Turkes, & has bin a great while abroad and could gett noe
+
prize, and had therefore taken a Spanish Commission which
+
was to last only for a tyme, which tyme or the says ?Gunner &
+
Irishman & others of the ''S:ta Cruse'' her company acknowledged
+
was expired two moneths before the seizure of the ''Lady ffrigott''
+
& her ladeing, but withall say thd that they were resolved to take
+
any English shipp they could light on notwithstanding the expiration
+
thereof, And this deponent well remembreth that the
+
Captaine of the ''Lady ffrigott'' told this deponent that hee did at the tyme
+
of her seizure desyre the foresayd ffrancisco Stale Commander of
+
the ''S:ta Cruse'' to show him his Commission by virtue whereof hee
+
was impowered to make seizure of the ''Lady ffrigott'' being an English ship
+
but//
+
----
+
P1110362 f. 123 recto
+
 
+
//but the says Stale refused to shew the same And further to this arle
+
hee cannot depose.
+
 
+
To the 3:th arle of the sayd allegation hee saith that the shipp
+
''lady ffrigott'' and her tackle furniture & freight and stock and
+
provisions on board her at the tyme of her seizure aforesayd were
+
then in this deponents Judgement worth five ?thousand pounds
+
sterling or neere thereabouts and soe much hee beleeveth the arlate
+
Swift Parker and Harris were damnified by the losse of them by
+
reason of the surprizall aforesayd And further hee cannot depose
+
 
+
To 4:th arle hee saith that in her this deponents Judgement XX
+
hundred and fifty tonnes of Mathaligo Currans seized on board the
+
''Lady ffrigott'' & belonging to the arlate Alderman Ricard & Company
+
were at their seizure worth two pounds tenn shillings sterling a hundred
+
which a mounteth being computed to a very considerable summe
+
but saith at p:rsent hee cannot compute the same, and saith hee is
+
well assured that if the sayd Currans had not bin suprized but
+
come safe to London they would here have yeilded the sayd Alderman
+
Riccard & Company two pounds tenn shillings sterling a hundred
+
that being the usuall market price there
+
 
+
To the Tenth & 11:th alre hee saith that hee this deponent being Cooper
+
& aborad at the seizure knoweth that the arlate Captaine Hoyser and
+
his Company had a board the sayd shipp the ''Lady ffrigott'' at the
+
tyme of her seizure in moneys & goods and Cloathes and instruments
+
to the value of twelve hundred pounds sterling at least all which
+
hee saith hee well knoweth were taken from him and them by the Captaine
+
and Company of the ''S:ta Cruse'' aforesays & hee & they dispoiled and
+
deprived of them by the sayd Captaine & Company of the sayd man of
+
warr called the ''S:ta Cruse'' who upon the
+
seizure of the sayd frigott plundered & tooke away all whatsoever
+
the sayd Captaine Hosier & his Company had and kept them
+
prisoners for some time in chaynes & afterwards turned them on XXXXX at the
+
Island ?Zephania to shXXX for them XXXXX without allowing ?them
+
either provisions or XXXXX this he knoweth being one of the Company
+
as aforesayd & soe kept in chaynes & after ?turned on shoare in manner
+
aforesayd.  And further hee cannot depose
+
 
+
To the last hee saith his foregoeing deposicon is true
+
 
+
LAWRANCE BURR [His signature]
+
 
+
<nowiki>**********************************************************</nowiki>
+
 
+
===Case: John Swift John Parker John Harris and Company, Owners of the Shipp the Lady ffrigott vs. Hippolito Centurione of Genoa and others: Deposition: 2. Richard Baker of Debtford, Kent, Mariner, aged ?20 : Date: June 3rd, 1659===
+
 
+
Rp
+
 
+
2.  RICHARD BAKER of Debtford in Kent Mariner
+
aged ?twenty yeares and upwards a wittness sworne
+
& examined saith & deposeth as followeth viz:t
+
 
+
To the first arle of the allegation hee saidth that during all the moneths
+
& tyme arlate in the yeares 1658 happening before the fowerteenth day
+
of November which was the day of her seizure, the arlate John Swift
+
John Parker John Harris & Company All English men & subiects of
+
the Commonwealth of England were & still ?aught to bee the lawfull Owners
+
& Proprietors of the arlate shipp the ''lady ffrigott'' & her tackle apparell
+
& furniture And for such comonly reputed This hee knoweth being one of the sayd
+
shipps//
+
----
+
P1110363
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110364 f. 123 verso
+
 
+
//shipps Company the voyages in question & a board her at her
+
seizure. And further hee deposeth not
+
 
+
To the 2 and 3 arles of the allegation hee saith that by ?reason hee
+
went the voyage in question hee knoweth the arlate Alderman Ricard
+
& others English Merchants of the Turkey Company did take the sayd shipp
+
the ''lady ffrigott'' to freight for a Merchandizing  voyage to be made from
+
London to ?Petrai & other pts beyond the seas to lade Currans & other
+
goods for their Account & bring them for London & there deliver them to
+
them or their Agents And saith the sayd shipp arrived safely at ?Polrao
+
Roade where the Agents of the sayd Alderman Riccard and
+
Company did lade & put aboard the sayd shipp for their Account
+
one hundred and sixty Tonnes of Mahalaga and Petrao Currans
+
viz:t one hundred & thiry of M(OR, N)athaligo & thirty Tonnes of Petrao Currans
+
to be transported for London and there delivered to  them or their Agents And
+
further hee cannot depose not knowing what other goods or money were
+
put aboard her for their sayd freighters Account, but knoweth there
+
were other goods beside the sayd Currans XX some bales of silke & other goods
+
laden aboard the sayd shipp
+
 
+
To the 4:th arle hee saith that whilst the shipp the ''lady ffrigott'' ?remayned in peaceable manner
+
at Pererao Roade with the sayd Currants & other her ladeing aboard her
+
viz:t the fowerteenth day of November one Thousand six hundred fifty
+
eight there came into the sayd Roade a shipp of warr of about one hundred
+
and fifty tonns and named (as be the Gunner of her & one of the Mates of
+
her who were both dutch men and could speake good English and by others of her
+
Company Italians which language alsoe this deponent can speake & understand this
+
deponent was informed) the ''S:ta Cruso'' ffrancisco Stale Captaine w:ch shipp hee saith had
+
when she came in a white Ancient in her poope and made as if she would
+
have Anchored neere the sayd shipp the ''Lady ffrigott'' but coming neere
+
the sayed ffrancisco Stale & his Company in a hostile manner with
+
swords & gunnes & other Instruments of warr boarded the sayd shipp
+
the ''lady ffrigott'' and wounded her Captaine Captaine John Hosier
+
& this deponent and severall others of her Company to the number of
+
five or sixe and surprised her and her ladeing of Currans and
+
other goods and dispoiled her and her ladeing of Currants and
+
other goods and dispoiled the Owners thereof of the same and
+
converted it to the use of the sayd Stale & his Company And further
+
saving his deposition to the subsequent arles hee cannot depose
+
 
+
To the 5:th and 6:th arles of the sayd allegation hee saith that hee
+
this deponent understanding Italian did after the sayd shipp of warr
+
the ''S:te Cruse'' had surprized the ''Lady ffrigott'' and her ladeing in manner
+
aforesayd ?heare severall of the ''S:ta Cruse'' her Company (Italians) sayd
+
that and acknowledge that their sayd shipp ''S:ta Cruse'' belonged to
+
Genoa and was XXXX & sett out thence by the arlate Hippolite Cen-
+
turioni who alsoe XX XXged sett out two other shipps of warr ?thence who came
+
thence in Company of the ''S:ta Cruse'', and that the Commander of the
+
''S:ta Cruse'' had before hee seized the ''lady ffrigott'' & her ladeing taken
+
some XXXers and souldiers out of the sayd two other Genoa shipps
+
the better to enable him to surprize the ''Lady ffrigott'' and her ladeing
+
And saith the greatest part of the Company of the ''S:ta Cruse'' who
+
made the sayd seizure were Italians and as they acknowledged belonging
+
to Genoa and further to these arles hee cannot depose
+
 
+
To the 7:th hee saith that after the seizure of the ''Lady ffrigott'' and her
+
ladeing hee alsoe heard severall of the ''S:ta Cruses'' Company say and
+
acknowledge that the ''S:ta Cruse'' was sett out from Genoa by the said
+
Hippolito Centuriani as a man of warr against the Turkes, and had
+
bin//
+
----
+
P1110365 f. 124 recto
+
 
+
//bin a great while abroad & could get no prizes, and therefore had taken
+
a Spanish Commission which was to last for a certayne tyme, and that the sayd
+
Commission was expired two moneths before the
+
seizure of the ''Lady ffrigott'' & her ladeing which notwithstanding (as they also
+
sayd & acknowledged) they were resolved to seize what English shipps and
+
their ladeing they could meete with under colour of that Commission And
+
further to this arle hee cannot depose.
+
 
+
To the 8:th arle hee saith that the ''Lady ffrigott'' and her tackle, ffurniture,
+
freight, stick, and provisions aboard her at her seizure aforesayd were
+
in this deponents Judgement worth fower thousand five hundred pounds
+
sterling or neere thereabouts and soe much the arlate Swift Packer
+
and Harris & Company Owners of her were by such her seizure XX damnified
+
in this deponents Judgement and as hee verily beleeveth.
+
 
+
To the 9:th arle hee saith that in his this deponents Judgement the
+
hundred & sixty tonnes of Mahaligo & Petrao Currans belonging
+
to the arlate Alderman Ricard and Company and seized on board the
+
''Lady ffrigott'' were  (?at the tyme of their seizure) worth fower thousand pounds sterling and
+
soe much in this deponents Judgement & as hee verily beleeveth they would
+
have yeilded the sayd Alderman Ricard & Company if he had not bin
+
taken by the sayd Genoa shipp of warr in manner aforesayd.  And
+
further hee cannot depose.
+
 
+
To the 10:th and 11:th hee saith that the arlate Captaine Hosyer, and his
+
Company at the tyme of the seizure of the shipp the ''lady
+
ffrigott'' & her ladeing had on board the sayd shipp goods that were his
+
& their adventures, and moneyes cloathes and instruments worth in
+
this deponents Judgement fowerteene hundred pounds of lawfull English
+
money All which hee saith hee well knoweth (being p:rsent at the seizure)
+
were seized and taken from the sayd Captaine Hoyser & his company
+
by the Captaine & Company of the sayd Genoa man of warr called
+
the ''S:ta Cruse'', & the sayd Hoyser & his Company utterly dispoiled of them
+
And saith that the Captaine & Company of the sayd Genoa man of
+
warr haveing made the sayd seizure of the ''lady ffrigott'' & her ladeing
+
plundered & taken away from her Captaine & her Company all that
+
they had., kept the most of her Company prisoners in the hold, XXXXX
+
for some tyme, and afterwards turned them on XXXX in the Ile of
+
Clephalonoa to XXX for them XXXX without allowing them wither
+
provisions or money And further to these arles he cannot depose
+
 
+
To the last hee saith his foregoeing deposition is true.
+
 
+
RICHARD BAKER  [His signature]
+
 
+
Repeated in Court before both Judges
+
 
+
<nowiki>*********************************************************</nowiki>
+
 
+
===Case: John Swift John Parker John Harris and Company, Owners of the Shipp the Lady ffrigott vs. Hippolito Centurione of Genoa and others: Deposition: 3.  Gilbert Anckelly, of Debtford, Kent, Mariner, late Boatswaine of the Lady ffrigozz, aged 30 : Date: June 3rd, 1659===
+
 
+
The same day
+
 
+
3.  GILBERT ANCKELLY of Debtford in Kent Mariner
+
late Boatswaine of the ''lady ffrigott'' aged thirty yeares
+
& upwards a wittnesse sworne & examined saith and
+
deposeth as followeth viz:t
+
 
+
To the first and second arles hee saith that during the months and tyme arlaze in
+
the yeare 1658 happening next before the fowerteenth day of the Month
+
of November the sayd yeare which was the day shee and her lading were
+
seized in maner hereafter specified, the arlate John SWift John Parker
+
John//
+
----
+
P1110366
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110367 f. 124 verso
+
 
+
//John Harris & Company all Englishmne & subiects of this Common
+
wealth of England were commonly reputed to be & soe still ought to be the
+
true lawfulll Owners and proprietors of the arlate Shipp the ''Lady
+
ffrigott'' & of her tackle apparell, & furniture And saith the sayd Shipp
+
was taken to freight by the arlate Alderman Riccard & Company
+
English Merchants on a trading voyage to be made from London
+
to Ligorne Portrai & other places beyond the seas to lade Currans & other goods
+
ther for their Account & deliver them heere at London to them or their Agents
+
 
+
-----
+
P1110368 f. 125 recto
+
 
+
===Case: John Swift John Parker John Harris and Company, Owners of the Shipp the Lady ffrigott vs. Hippolito Centurione of Genoa and others: Deposition: 4.  John Carrier, of Debtford, Kent, Shipwright, late Carpenters Mate of the Lady ffriggott, aged 22 : Date: June 3rd, 1659===
+
----
+
P1110369
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110370 f. 125 verso
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
+
 
+
<nowiki>**************************************************</nowiki>
+
 
+
===Case: John Swift John Parker John Harris and Company, Owners of the Shipp the Lady ffrigott vs. Hippolito Centurione of Genoa and others: Deposition: 5.  John Gates, of Debtford, Kent, Ship Wright, one of the Carpenters of the Lady ffrigott, aged 18 : Date: June 4th, 1659===
+
----
+
P1110371
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110372
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110373
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110374 f. XXX recto
+
 
+
===Case: John Swift John Parker John Harris and Company, Owners of the Shipp the Lady ffrigott vs. Hippolito Centurione of Genoa and others: Deposition: 6.  John Cock, of Redriff, Surrey, Marriner, late Quartermaster of the Lady ffrogott, aged 40 : Date: June 4th, 1659===
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110375
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110376
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110378 f. XXX recto
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
 
+
<nowiki>***********************************************</nowiki>
+
 
+
===Case: John Swift John Parker John Harris and Company, Owners of the Shipp the Lady ffrigott vs. Hippolito Centurione of Genoa and others: Deposition: 7.  William Bowtell, of London, Merchant, aged 25 : Date: June 4th, 1659===
+
----
+
P1110379 f. XXX verso
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
 
+
<nowiki>***********************************************</nowiki>
+
 
+
===Case: John Swift John Parker John Harris and Company, Owners of the Shipp the Lady ffrigott vs. Hippolito Centurione of Genoa and others: Deposition: 8.  John Savage, of S:t Bartholomew eanr the Exchange, London, Merchant, aged 32 : Date: June 4th, 1659===
+
----
+
===Case: S:r John Dethick Knight, Edward Bolle, John Bancks Richard ffoord, Edward Mico, William ?Pretman and Company, concerning the Bantam ffrigott:  Deposition: Catch Kyme, of Ratcliffe, Stepney, Middlesex, Mariner, Mate of the bantam ffrigot, aged 26 : Date: March 24th 1658===
+
 
+
P1110382 f. 266 recto
+
 
+
//The 24:th of March 1658
+
 
+
A business of y:e Examinacon of Witnesses on the behalfe)
+
of S:r John Dethick Knight, Edward Bolle, John Bancks)
+
Richard ffoord, Edward Mico, William ?Pretman, and)
+
Company concerning the seizure, and for some time)
+
detention and the hinderance of the trade in a Certaine)
+
ship called the ''BANTAM FFRIGOT'' whereof Isaac Taylor)
+
was M:r and Comand:r & such of the lading)
+
as was aboard the said Ship in ffact but unduly made)
+
by Antonie Van Voozst Captaine and Comander of
+
the ship the ''Turtle Dove'' in the Imediate Service of)
+
the Dutch East India Company and alsoe Concerning)
+
all Damages happening thereupon and ag:t one John
+
?Mait ?Suijker y:e now, or late Generall of the said Company)
+
at Battavia in y:e East Indias ag:t the said Van Voozst in pticular)
+
and all others y:e will take upon them the Justificaccon of the said Busines)
+
 
+
FRANCKLIN
+
 
+
Examined upon
+
and Allegacon given
+
in by M:r ffrancklin
+
on the part and
+
Behalfe of the
+
said S:r John Dethicke
+
Knight Edward Bolle
+
John Bancks Richard
+
Foord, Edward Mico
+
William Pretman
+
and Company.
+
 
+
1. ub:  CATCH KYME of Ratcliffe in the
+
parish of Stepney and County of Mid
+
Mariner Mate of the ''Bantam ffrigot'' aged 26 yeeres or thereabouts
+
Sworne and Examined
+
 
+
To the first arle of the said Allon hee saith and deposeth
+
that during all the monethes of September
+
October, November, December, January, ffebruary and March
+
1656: English Stil, and Continually since: the said S:r John
+
Dethick Knight, Edward Bolle, John Bancks Richard fford
+
Edward Mico and William Pretman and Company
+
have bin and are Comonly accounted and reputed the true
+
and lawfull owne:rs and proprieto:rs of the said ship the
+
''BANTAM FRIGOT'' (whereof Isaac Taylor was & is M:r.) and
+
of the tackle Apparrell, and furniture, And soe hee verils
+
beleeveth they were, and at p:rsent are; And further hee
+
cannot depose.
+
 
+
To the Second hee saith that y:e said S:r John Dethick, and
+
Company aforesaid /who are all (as hee beleeveth) subjects of
+
this Comonwealth of England.) did set out the said ship from
+
this port of London in the sayd moneth of October 1656 (sic)
+
upon their owne account (as hee beleeveth) to East India. there to
+
Lade pepper. and other Merchandizes, and to bring the same
+
for ?Europe, and saith the said Isaac Taylor, was and was
+
M:r of the said ship y:e said voyage, and y.e arlate Thomas
+
Newman Supra Cargoe; w:ch hee knoweth for that hee went M:rs Mate
+
of y:e said ship (y:e said Voyage) and further cannot depose:
+
 
+
To the third hee saith y:e said Taylo, Newman, and this depo:t
+
the rest of the Marine:rs of the said Ship, set saile
+
in her from this port to ?Indria ?Ponza in y:e island of Sumatra in y:e East Indias
+
and there ?arriveth on or about y:e Nineth or tenth day of August 1657: w:ch hee knoweth being
+
then on board her and further cannot depose//
+
----
+
P1110383 f. 266 verso
+
 
+
//To the 4:th. 5:th 6:th 7:th 8:th and 9:th hee saith that about a moneth after
+
the Arrivall of the said ship the ''Bantam ffrigatt'' at Indra
+
Ponza aforesaid the said Thomas Newman, and one ?ffrancis
+
Griffith y:e then purser of the said ship (who is since deceased)
+
did goe on shore, in the sd port of Indra Ponza, to buy pepper
+
and did buy a great quantity of pepper there, w:ch was all
+
to have bin transported in the said ship to Leghorne,
+
for the Acco:t of Sr John Dethick and Company aforesaid
+
And saith a Considerable Quantity of the said pepper
+
was Laden on board her, w:ch did not Lade the said ship
+
two Third pts of what shee could have well ?carryed
+
and saith That while y:e Company of the said ship was lading
+
in y:e rest of the sd pepper w:ch y:e said Thomas Newman and
+
ffrancis Griffith had provided and whilest the said Newman
+
and Griffith were on shore, providing More pepper to ?Complete Lading
+
of the said ship, The arlate
+
Comander of the ship the ''Turtle Dove'', whereof one Antonio van Voozt was Comander in the Service of the Dutch
+
East India Company, and alsoe three pinnaces in y:e Company
+
of the said ship ''Turtle Dove'', which were alsoe in the service of
+
the Dutch East India Company, came all of them and
+
Anchored by y:e said ''Bantam ffrigot'', and Imediately sent
+
a Boate on board the ''Bantam ffrigot'', with a Dutch merchant
+
therein & two others of y:e the ''Turtle Doves'' Company w:th hom w:ho Comanded y:e said Isaac Taylor, and the said
+
Thomas Newman. (whereupon y:e comong of the said Dutch
+
Merchant & the two others on board the said ship was sent came
+
on board, to y:e said Dutch merchant) Not to take in any
+
more pepper or other Goods onboard the said ''Bantam ffrigott''
+
either at the said port of Indra Ponza, or any other port or
+
place  on that Coast, for if they did the said Captaine
+
van Voozt who was y:e Admirall  in those pts  would seize and surprize them , or to that effect
+
and thereupon y:e said M:r Newman went with the said Ducth
+
Merchant onboad the said ship ''Turtle Dove'' to speake with the
+
said Captaine Van Voozt and knowe of him why XXX
+
would not permit him the said Newman to Trade  XXXX
+
his said ''Bantam ffrigot'' there, And saith that some XXXX
+
after y:e said Newman had bin gone to the said XXXX
+
Admirall the said Captaine Isaac Taylor sent this deponent
+
in the ''Bantam ffrigots'' Boate. to fetch the said M:r Newman
+
from on board y:e said Dutch Admirall on board the ''Bantam ffrigot''
+
And this depo:t being come on board the said Dutch Admirall
+
hee heardthe said Admirall Voozt, say and declare unto
+
the said M:r newman that hee the said Voozt had order?s
+
from the Generall of Battavia to hinder allEnglish Shipps
+
from Commerce and Trade in these parts, and to seize y:e XXX
+
if they did soe, or to that effect, and alsoe shewed the said XXX
+
(in the p:rsence of this depo:t his orders in writing with a Great XXXXX Given him
+
the said Generall, to the foresaid purpose & effect, and XXX//
+
----
+
P1110384 f. 267 recto
+
 
+
//Admirall Van Voozt Commander the said M:r Newman (in
+
this Depo:ts hearing) not to take in any more pepper or other goods
+
at Indra Ponza or any other ports or places on that Coast
+
and told the said Newman that if hee did soe, or offered to doe soe; hee must and
+
would seize and surprize his goods or to that effect, and
+
thereupon the said M:r Newman went with this depo:t in
+
the said ''Bantam ffrigots'' Boate, (w:ch this depo:t had brought
+
for him as aforesaid) and went on board the ''Bantam
+
ffrigot'', and told the said Captaine Taylor what the said
+
Dutch Admirall Voozt, had declared and said, and the
+
next day the said Captaine Taylo:r went with this depo:t
+
on board y:e said Dutch Admirall, and saith that upon
+
the said Taylor coming on board; y:e said Taylor and
+
Van Voozt had a great deale of Difference  together in
+
Dutch, (w:ch this depo:t cannot understand) and saith that
+
the said Voozt did shewe y:e said Taylour and after this depo:t and the said Taylor had bin XX on board y:e said XXXX came alsoe unto XXXX XXXX Dutch in y:e p:rsence of this depo:t  & y:e sd Newman his foresaid
+
orders in writing. w:ch had a great seale affixed therto
+
as aforesaid, and the said Voozt delivered the same to
+
the said Taylo:r to read: w:ch the said Taylo:r (who well
+
understandeth the Dutch Language, and can write and read the same.) accordingly did read y:e same over; and after
+
hee had soe done hee & the said Newman went with this depo:t in the said
+
''Bantam ffrigots'' Boate on board y:e ''Bantam ffrigot'', And
+
y:e said Taylo:r ?there told the said Newman & this depo:t that y:e said writing that hee
+
soe read was a Comission from y:e Generall of Battavia
+
to hinder English Ships from Trade there and further hee
+
cannot depose; saving that the said Captaine Van Voozt, did
+
send one of ?his foresaid pinnaces about thirty
+
men therein, to lye at the Rivers mouth at Indra Ponza to hinder
+
and did hinder the goeing in and coming out of the Captaine
+
and Company of the ''Bantam frigot'' (sic), to and from Indra Ponza
+
and from bringing any goods from thence on board y:e said ship
+
''Bantam ffrigot''.
+
 
+
To the 10:th hee saith that a day or two after the said Tailo:r M:r Newman and
+
this depo:t had bin on board y:e said Dutch Admirall. the said
+
M:r Newman. (w:ch was then on shore) put a Quantity of pepper in y:e said
+
''Bantam ffrigots'' Long Boate, and the said Newman himselfe
+
went in y:e said Boate, and intended to have come directly
+
to the ''Bantam ffrigot'', and to put y:e said pepper
+
on board her, But the said Boate and pepper. and alsoe the
+
said Thomas Newman was seized by order of the said Van
+
Voozt and y:e said pepper y:e said Voozt caused to be tooke out of y;e Boate a& put into his owne and by him detained and further hee deposeth not
+
 
+
To the 11:th hee saith hee cannot depose saving as aforesaid
+
 
+
To the 12:th hee cannot depose; hee being then dangerously sick in his
+
Cabbin: saving y:e ''bantam ffrigot'' was carried by the said Van
+
Voozt and his Company to Battavia. and there anchored under
+
Comand of the said Van Voozt his said ship, and severall other Dutch//
+
----
+
P1110385 f. 267 verso
+
 
+
//To the 14:th hee saith that y:e said Thomas Newman
+
and Isaac Taylor were Comanded at Battavia to appeare
+
before John Ma?rt SXXXX Generall of the Dutch East
+
India Company at Battava (sic), and further cannot depose
+
 
+
To the 15:th and 16:th hee cannot depose being then dangerously
+
sick, and was carried out of the said ship ''Bantam ffrigot''
+
to a house in Battavia where hee lay sick about
+
five weekes.
+
 
+
To the 17:th & 18:th hee saith that the said ship the ''Bantam ffrigot''
+
was detained and hindered by y:e said Van Voost
+
and the Generalll of Battavia, and their order, from
+
the Eleventh of October 1657: or therabouts
+
untill the tenth of December following, and then
+
the said Ship set saile from Batavia for Rurope
+
 
+
w:th such Pepper as shee had taken in before the said
+
11:th of October, shee not being pmitted to take in
+
any goods whatsoever afterwards in those parts that
+
this depo:t knoweth of, and further cannot depose
+
saving as aforesaid
+
 
+
To the 19:th hee cannot depose:
+
 
+
To the 20:th hee saith that the said Bantam ffrigot
+
was when she was in the pts aforesaid of the
+
Burthen of about Two hundred and tenne Tonns
+
and as many Tonne of pepper hee beleeveth shee
+
would have brought for Europe y:e said Voyage; had shee
+
not bin hindred interrupted and detained as aforesd. and further
+
cannot depose:
+
 
+
To the 21:th hee saith y:e said ship y:e ''Bantam ffrigot''
+
after her Departure from Battavia, sayled to Leghorne
+
and there safely arrived on or about the 18:th day
+
of August 1658: and there her said pepper taken in
+
at Indra Ponza was delivered. but howe many
+
Tonns y:e same amounted to hee knoweth not, and saith
+
hee this depo:t was upon y:e departure of y:e said ship ''Bantam
+
ffrigot'' brought from shore on board her, and Carried
+
in her to Leghorne and further cannot depose:
+
 
+
To the 22:th 23:th 24:th 25:th 26:th 27:th 28:th and 19:th hee saith hee
+
cannot depose thereto saving as aforesaid, and saving
+
that the said S:r John Dethick Knight, and y:e reste of
+
the sd Owne:rs: and Imploy:rs of y:e said ship, have suffred
+
great Losse and dammage by meanes of the premisses
+
but saith hee cannot estimate the same,:
+
 
+
To the 20:th hee saith that whilest the said Shipp y:e ''Bantam
+
ffrigat'' was upon y:e sd Coast of Sumatra, y:e Voyage in question
+
and during all the space the Dutch as aforesaid had her in XXX
+
power//
+
----
+
P1110386 f. 268 recto
+
 
+
//Power, and under their Command neither the said Thomas
+
Newman y:e Supra Cargoe of the said Ship ''Bantam ffrigot'' nor the
+
said Isaac Taylor y:e captaine of the said ship ?or any of
+
y:e Marine.rs of her did doe any Injury or Wrong in
+
any Kinde to the said Dutch or any of them. ?that this
+
depo:t knoweth if. but did XXXXX them selves Civily
+
and peaceably towards them and this hee XXXXX
+
being M:r Mate of y:e said ship y:e said Voyage And
+
further cannot depose:
+
 
+
To the 31:th hee Cannot depose
+
 
+
To the 32:th he saith his foregoeing depon is true
+
 
+
Repetit before D:r Godolphon
+
 
+
CALIB XXXXX  [His signature]
+
 
+
<nowiki>************************************************</nowiki>
+
 
+
===Case: S:r John Dethick Knight, Edward Bolle, John Bancks Richard ffoord, Edward Mico, William ?Pretman and Company, concerning the Bantam ffrigott:  Deposition: 2. Lewis Walter, of Deptford, Mariner, aged 40 : Date: March 25th 1658===
+
----
+
P1110387
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110388
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110389
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110390 f. 270 recto
+
 
+
===Case: S:r John Dethick Knight, Edward Bolle, John Bancks Richard ffoord, Edward Mico, William ?Pretman and Company, concerning the Bantam ffrigott:  Deposition: 3. William Chamber, of Ratcliffe, Mariner, Gunner of the Bantam ffrigott, aged 48, Date: March 28th 1658===
+
----
+
P1110391
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110392
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110393
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110394
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110395 f. 272 verso
+
 
+
===Case: S:r John Dethick Knight, Edward Bolle, John Bancks Richard ffoord, Edward Mico, William ?Pretman and Company, concerning the Bantam ffrigott:  Deposition: 4. Thomas Newman, of Mile End, Stepney, Merchant, late Supra cargo of the Bantam ffrigott, aged 43:  Date: Aprill 16th 1658===
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110396 f. 273 recto
+
 
+
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
+
 
+
To the 4:th hee saith that
+
Indra Ponza Roade is and ought to be
+
a place free for the English to trade in ober w:ch place y:e Queene of Achine
+
(whom this depo:t well knoweth having lived with her about five yeeres)
+
was and is the supreame Governournesse; who did about three yeeres
+
since?there: and at all other of her Dominiones proclaime ffree
+
Trade to the English Nation; And saith hee hath a Copy of the
+
said Proclamacon now in his Custody. And saith that after the
+
arrivall of the said Ship  in y:e said Road this depo:t and one
+
ffrancis Griffith (who is since deceased) went ashore to Indra
+
Ponza to buy and provide pepp to lade the said ship, and  did
+
there buy & provide enough pepper XXX to Lade the said ship, and was
+
all to have bin there put on board her. and to be Carried and
+
Transported in her to leghorne for the Account of the said ffrancis
+
who hee knoweth for y:e Reasons aforesd, And further deposeth not.
+
 
+
To the 5:th arles of the said Allon, hee saith that in y:e monethes
+
of September, and October 1657, this Depo:t upon y:e Account aforesd
+
did Lade aboard y:e said ship y:e ''Bantam'', shee then Lying in teh Roade
+
of Indra Ponza aforesaid six hundred seaventy two BXXXX of pepp
+
And//
+
----
+
P1110397 f. 173 verso
+
 
+
//And that the rest of the pepper sufficient fully to lade the said
+
ship was then ready provided, and XXX, and was ready
+
to have bin put on board, and would have bin Laden Aboard
+
the said Ship within three or foure dayes next following, in
+
case y:e arlate Antonio van Voozt and Company had not
+
hindered them as hereafter is declared:
+
 
+
To the 6:th & 7:th arle of the sd Allon hee saith that on or about
+
the Eleveth day of October 1657: English Stile namely p:rsently after hee
+
this depo:t had sent out y:e foresaid 672 Bahaizes (sic) of Pepper on board the
+
''Bantam ffrigot'', this depo:t was sent for to Come on board
+
the ''Bantam'', And this depo:t accordingly went on board
+
the ''Bantam'', and upon his comming to her found y:e Arlate
+
Ship the ''Turtle Dove'' whereof y:e said Van Voozt was Comander
+
and alsoe three vessells with about tenne or Twelve peeces
+
of Ordinance a peece; Anchored neere y:e Bantam; And saith that
+
there came a Dutch Merchant from onboard y:e said Van Voozts
+
Ship. (w:ch was the Admirall in those pts.) who told this dep:t that
+
hee and y:e sd Taylor must come aboard their Comanders, (meaning the ''Turtle
+
Dove''; w:ch this Depo:t accordingly did. but the said Taylo:r
+
refused soe to doe saying hee had order from his imploy:rs
+
not to goe out of his Ship; or to that effect, And saith that upon
+
this Depots Comong on board y.e said ''Turtle Dove'', hee
+
Asked the said van Voozt where fore hee had sent for this
+
depo:t and y:e said Captaine Taylo:r to Come on board  his
+
Ship, or to that effect whereunto the said Van Voozt made
+
Answer, that it was in regard the said ship the ''Bantam
+
ffrigot'' being an English Ship did trade there or to that effect,
+
And the said Van Voozt then pemptorily (sic) Charged & Comanded
+
this Depo:t that neither hee nor the said Isaac
+
Taylor nor any of y:e ''Bantams'' Company should trade there
+
or to that effect, And this Depo:t then told the said Van Voozt
+
that the ships full Lading of pepper was there ashore by him
+
bought, and some of it was allready Laden, and y:e rest
+
was provided to be laden and would within three or foure dayes
+
be all Laden aboard the said ship, and that hee had
+
money and Goods on shore; bit that hee should Dispatch all within
+
three or foure Dayes, and then be ready to depart with the ''Bantam''
+
and her Lading on board her, or to that effect and desired
+
the said Van Voozt not to give him any interruption therein
+
But the said Antonio van Voozt then told this Depo;t that if hee
+
did not dept from thence with the said ship without further
+
trading ?There, hee would forthwith force this depo:t and y:e sd Ship
+
and Company thereof to Dept thence; or to that effect, All w:ch
+
words and XXXions passed betweene this Depo:t & y:e sd Van Voozt on
+
board//
+
 
+
----
+
P1110398 f. 274 recto
+
 
+
//On board the sd ''Turtle Dove'' in the ?Molaine and English Language
+
but w:th Languages the said Van Voozt, and alsoe this Depo:t well spake
+
& understood and saith that one Kaleb ?Kime Mate of the ''Bantam''
+
heard some of the said words, and further hee cannot depose,
+
saving that both the said Van Voozt, and y:e ''Turtle Dove'', and
+
alsoe the said ther three vessells were then in the Imediate
+
Service of the Dutch East India Company:
+
 
+
To the 6:th hee saith that y:e next day after this Depo:t had bin
+
on board y:e ''Turtle Dove'' as aforesaid y:e said Captaine
+
Taylo:r went on board y:e said ''Dove'', but what discourse or
+
Words passed betweene him & y:e sd Van Voozt hee knoweth
+
not in regard hee went not with him, And further cannot
+
depose.
+
 
+
To the 9:th 10:th 11:th & 12:th hee saith that on y:e day y:t y:e said Taylo:r Went onboard
+
the said ''Turtle Dove'' as aforesd or y:e next day after this depo:t and
+
y:e said Taylo:r did againe goe aboard y:e sd ''Turtle Dove'', together,
+
And this depo:t & the said Taylor after their Coming on board her told the said
+
Van Voozt that besides y:e pepp that was on board the said
+
''Bantam ffrigot'' hee this depo:t had laid out at Indra Ponza three Thousand
+
Dollars and had invested y:e same in pepper. And desired
+
the said Van Voozt that hee would not hinder the lading
+
of the same on board the said Ship y:e ''Bantam'' or to that
+
effect, But the said Van Voozt in a Violent and Angry manner
+
said that none of the said Pepper should be brought aboard
+
the ''Bantam ffrigot'', and said ffurther that if any attempt
+
was made to bring any pepp aboard y:e said ship the
+
''Bantam ffrigot'' hee would seize, and take the same, And
+
alsoe told this depo:t and the said Tailo:r that
+
all the Trade for pepp on the West Coast of Sumatra in
+
the Queene of ?Acheines Dominions, belonged to the Dutch
+
East India Company: And then this Depo:t
+
went on board y:e ''Bantam'' and from thence this Depo:t
+
went in the ''bantam ffrigots'' Boate ashore, and there
+
caused about a Bahaire of pepper to be put on board y:e
+
said Boate; and having soe done, this depo:t went him
+
selfe into the said Boate intending to goe directly onboard
+
the''Bantam'' with the said pepper. but in his passage
+
one of y:e said Dutch Vessells. w:ch came and Anchored
+
at or neere y:e Barre of y:e River of Indra Ponza, sent her
+
boate and alsoe another Boate well manned to seize this depo:t and y:e said ''Bantam
+
ffrogotts'' boate & y:e Pepper therein w:ch they accordingly did
+
and Carried this depo:t & y:e Said Boate and Pepper to the
+
said Dutch Vessell and from thence they were sent to the
+
said Dutch Admirall the ''Turtle Dove''; and there the said
+
Pepper was by the said Van Voozt his order. taken out
+
of the said Boate and putt aboard y:e said ''Turtle Dove''
+
And//
+
----
+
P1110399 f. 274 verso
+
 
+
//And there detained the same, And thereupon this Depo:t
+
and the said Isaac taylor and one ?Gotham Howard
+
Cheife Mate of the said ship protested against the
+
said Antonio van Voozt Comander of the said ship
+
the ''Turtle Dove'' and all of his Imploye:rs and having
+
nowe seene the first schedule annexed to the sd Allon
+
beginning WHEREAS THE QUEENE OF ACHEIN
+
&c: and Ending: Dated from on board y:e ''Bantam''
+
October y:e 19:th 1657: and subscribed Thomas Newman
+
Isaac Taylo:r Gotham Howard. hee saith the same
+
was and is a true Copy of the said Originall  protest
+
made by this depo:t and y:e said Isaac Taylo:r and Howard
+
ag:t y:e sd Van Voozt, and all his Imploye:rs And
+
y:e said Originall protest was really and truely signed
+
by this depo:t and the said Isaac taylo:r and Gotham
+
Howard on or about, the said Nineteenth of October 1657
+
and y:e Contents thereof were and are true; And
+
further hee doth not depose.
+
 
+
To the 13:th hee saith that the said Van Voozt on or about
+
the said Nineteenth of Octob:r 1657: Caused the sd
+
Captaine Taylo:r and Company to Depart from
+
Indra Ponza, and sailed with the ''Bantam ffrigot''
+
in her way to Bantam. neere w:ch place arriving
+
the said Van Voozt, nor any other of the Dutch shipps
+
Lying before Bantam, soe that y:e ''Bantam
+
ffrigot'' was Constrained to goe to Battavia.  And y:e said Van Voozt in
+
his ship the ''Turtle Dove''; and alsoe the saidthree other
+
Dutch Vessells. Sailed with her thither, and there hee
+
saith the said ''Bantam ffrigot'' lay under Comand of
+
the said ''Turtle Dove''; and y:e sd Three other dutch
+
vessells, and alsoe Under y:e Comand of severall other
+
Dutch ships there lying, alsoe in y:e Service of the said
+
Dutch East India Company. W:ch hee knoweth for that
+
hee was Carried in y:e said Ship ''Bantam'' from
+
Indra Ponza to Battavia. And further cannot depose
+
 
+
To the 14:th & 15:th hee saith that upon or about the ?7:th o October
+
1657: English Stile this Depo:t, and Captaine Isaac Taylo:r
+
were Comanded to Appeare before the arlate John
+
Martsuyker the Generall of and for the Dutch East
+
India Company at Battavia w:ch they according (sic) did
+
And the said Generall then told this Depo:t and y:e
+
said Taylo:r that hee had order that neither
+
they, nor any of the English should trade in any of the
+
Dominions of the Queene of Acheine, or to that effect
+
but//
+
----
+
P1110400 f. 275 recto
+
 
+
'''Poor quality digital image'''
+
 
+
//But the said Generall said that hee would speake with
+
his Counsell there that they might be XXXXXX with a Lading
+
at Battavia, And promised soe to doe, But notwithstandinge
+
hee put on board y:e ''Bantam ffrigot'' two or three XXXX
+
w:ch Comtinued on board y:e said Ship ''Bantam'', untill  her
+
departure from Battavia, w:ch was
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P111401 f. 375 verso
+
 
+
//or thereabouts, During all w:ch time they or some of
+
them, would not suffer this Depo:t nor the said Captaine
+
Taylo:r nor any of the ''Bantam ffrigots'' Company
+
to take in any newe or other Lading on board her,
+
And soe this Depot and the said
+
Taylo:r and Company were forced to Depart with
+
the ''Bantam ffrigot'' from Battavia, and out of the
+
East Indias for Europe; with only the foresaid six hundred
+
Seaventy two Balarzes of pepp, w:ch were as aforesd
+
Laden on board the said ship, at Indra Ponza before
+
the said Van Voozt came and Interrupted and
+
hindred them as aforesaid: The premisses hee
+
Deposeth Goeing all the said time Supra Cargo
+
of the said ship as aforesaid, and further Cannot
+
depose
+
 
+
To the 10:th hee saith that had not this depo:t and Company
+
bin Interrupted and hindred by the said Van
+
Voozt and Company and y:e Dutch?X as aforesaid, all the said
+
pepp that this Depo:t had bought and provided
+
at Indra Ponza as aforesaid would have bin Laden
+
onboard the ''Bantam ffrigot'' for y:e account of the said ffreighto:rs and
+
undoubtedly have bin brought safe for Europe for
+
their said Account, And this depo:t further saith that
+
hee heard the said Taylo:r say at Legorne that Command:XX
+
of ships had there received her before any of her pepper
+
was unladen, and had or would give an Attestaccon under
+
their hands that the said ship Would have Carried
+
Ninety five tonnes or thereabouts of pepper more than shee had on board her or to
+
that effect, And further hee cannot depose:
+
 
+
To the 19:th hee saith hee Cannot depose:
+
 
+
To the 20:th hee saith that yt y:e time y:e said ship was in
+
East India aforesaid shee was as hee beleeveth of the
+
Burthen of 210 Tonnes or thereabouts, And further
+
cannot depose
+
 
+
To the 21:th hee saith that after y:e Departure of the said
+
''Bantam ffrigot'' from the East Indias as a foresaid shee
+
set saile for Legorne and there arrived  on or about
+
the 18:th or 19:th day of August 1658: English Stile there the
+
said six hundred seaventy two BXXXXXX of pepper
+
were unladen and of the sd ship.  And this
+
hee deposeth arriving therein her and further hee
+
cannot depose//
+
----
+
P111402 f. 376 recto
+
 
+
//To the 22:th hee deposeth not:
+
 
+
To the 23:th hee can not depose.
+
 
+
To the 24:th hee cannot deose, saving that every hundred weight
+
of the said Pepp at the time of the unlading thereof at Lighorne did
+
make a quintall
+
 
+
To the 25:th hee daith that at the said time of unlading
+
the said shipp at Leghorne every Quintall was worth about
+
fourteene peeces of Eight cleare of al Charges (sccounting
+
every oeece of Eight at five shillings a pXXXX and XXXX
+
and about that rfate a Quintall of Copper (sic) was then and
+
there usually sold for.  And further hee Cannot depose
+
 
+
To the 26:th hee saith that the said 672 Bahaizes of
+
pepp soe laden on board the said ship as aforesaid at
+
Andra (sic) Ponza, and Carried in the said ship XX XXXX did
+
cost at Indra Ponza XXXX thousand seaven hundred &
+
fifteene peeces of Eight or neere thereabouts accounting
+
every peece of Eight at five shillings a peece at Indra
+
Ponza, w:ch doth amount unto 2428:li 15:s sterl: And saith
+
that the provision and ?scuturage of the same doth amount
+
to about 375:li sterl.  The p:rmisses hee deooseth being
+
supra Cargoe of the said ship the said voyage; and
+
Laid out the said peeces of Eight at Indra Ponza
+
And further cannot depose:
+
 
+
To the 28:th hee saith that the said S:r John Dethick
+
Knight, and the rest of the ffreighters aforesad, have abd
+
must pay all y;e Dead ffreight, and for the Dammage
+
of the said ''Bantam ffrigot'' by the Dutch aforesd
+
And further hee cannot depose:
+
 
+
To the 29:th hee saith that the said S:r John Dethick and all
+
the partyes in the suite; (w:ho are all Englishmen and
+
subjects of this Comonwealth of England) besides the
+
foresaid damages , have sustained great Loss; and
+
Damages in forbearance of their principall money.
+
 
+
And further cannot depose.
+
 
+
To the 30:th hee saith that during the time that the said
+
ship the ''Bantam ffrigot'' was upon y:e Coast of Sumatra
+
& in y:e East Indias y:e Voyage in question; this depo:t
+
and the said Captaine Taylor and Company of the
+
said Ship Did Carry and demaneane themselves very
+
Civilly, and peacably, and did not doe any Injury or
+
wrong to any of the ships, goods, or psons, of or belonging
+
to the said Dutch East India Company, And that in
+
?Respect//
+
----
+
P1110403 f. 376 verso
+
 
+
//Respect of the Lading of the said Ship un the East Unias
+
the Generall of Battavia, and y:e said Van Voozt and
+
Company, Dif not Carry themselves Civilly towards
+
this Depo:t and y:e sd Taylo:r and Company. W:ch hee
+
knoweth, for y:e Reasons aforesd. And further
+
cannpt depose
+
 
+
To the 31:th hee saith that the said John Maetsuijker
+
the Generall of the said Dutch East India Company
+
at battavia Did (upon or about the 11:th
+
day of December 1657) at Battavia
+
give this Depo:t writing in the Dutch Language
+
subscribed w:th his owne hand. signifying. the goode
+
Carriage, and dilligence of this Depo:t And having
+
now sene the third schedule annexed to the said Allon
+
hee saith the same was and is the said Originall
+
writing soe Given to this Depo:t and by the sd Generall & XXXXX this Deps saw
+
the said ?Joan Mastsing subscribe the same
+
And further cannot depose-
+
 
+
To the last hee saith his foregoeing depon is true
+
 
+
THOMAS NEWMAN  [His signture]
+
 
+
Repeated before D:r Godolphin
+
 
+
Here end proceedings in the protestors name
+
 
+
<nowiki>***********************************</nowiki>
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110404 f. 277 recto
+
 
+
'''So-so quality digital image'''
+
 
+
===Case: The Brazill Company of Portugall concerning the Jonathan and Abigaill:  Deposition:  Thomas Morley: Date:  June 13th 1659===
+
 
+
//The 13:th of June 1659
+
 
+
The Brazill Company of Portugall ag:t)
+
200 Quintalls of Brazil Wood or)
+
therabouts brought to this port)
+
in the ''Jonathan and Abigail'')<ref>The ''Jonathan and Abigaill''.  See a later case involving the same ship. ([[MRP: HCA 13/76 Part One#head-5cf0caba21d3cd72801297968068a55885f62c8c|HCA 13/76 Part One: f. 1 recto: Case: The Jonathan and Abigail vs. Daniel Edwards: Deposition: Thomas Andrews, of Wapping, in the parish of White Chappell: Date: 16:th August 1666]]</ref>
+
 
+
(Thomas Morley M:r) and ag:t)
+
John Thacker)
+
 
+
Suckley  Cheeker
+
 
+
Rp
+
 
+
Examined upon y:e Allon given
+
in by M:r Suckley
+
 
+
THOMAS MORLEY master of
+
the ship the ''Jonathan & Abigail''
+
aged 48 yeeres or thereabouts
+
sworne and Examined.
+
 
+
To the first arle of the said Allon hee saith and Deposeth
+
that y:e parcell of Brazil wood arlate (being two Hundred Kintalls (sic), or therabouts
+
was was (sic) brought to this Port in y:e said ship the ''Jonathan
+
& Abigail'', as Delivered to this Depo:t out of a yard at
+
Lisbone, w:ch yard did belong to the Portugall XXXX ?India Company as thisDepo:t
+
was then and there Credibly Informed and ?soe hee verily beleeveth
+
And saith that one John Roles, a Portugueze (sic) Broker, whom
+
this Depo:t Imployed in procuring of goods to lade onboard y:e sd
+
ship upon freight did ?procure all y:e said Brazill Wood, and y:e said Roles
+
hath often times told this Depo:t, about the time of the Lading thereof  that y:e said Wood was to be
+
transported in y:e said Ship to London for y:e Account of the
+
Portugall Brazil Company, and soe this Depo:te verily beleeveth it was,
+
And saith that the said Roles did pcure other goods for this
+
Depo:t y:e said time of this Depo:ts being there, and saith there
+
was an Agreemt made amongst divers of the Merchants that
+
laded goods in y:e sd Ship that there should be
+
a Teston upon each Chest of Sugar, and tow Ryalls upon
+
each pipe of Oyle, and after that proporcon, for other goods
+
to be Given as a Gratuity to y:e Convoy that stayed there for
+
the ''Jonathan & Abigail'', and other English ships then there
+
And this Depo:t Demanded of the said Roles y:e like rates
+
for y:e said Brazill Wood and y:e other goods y:t hee
+
procured, and y:t were laden on board y:e said Ship, But for
+
the said 200 Quintalls of Brazil Wood y:e said Roles refused
+
to allow any thing. telling this Depo:t that y:e same did belong
+
to the Brazil Company, and they being a Joint Company
+
would beare their owne Adventures or to that effect, But
+
for the other goods that the sd Roles procured, y:e said Roles allowed y:e rates
+
aforesaid, to this Depo:t for y:e said Convoy, And soe much this
+
Depo:t beleeveth hee hath acknowledged to severall psons
+
The foresd premises hee deposeth, being M:r of the said
+
ship aforesaid And further Cannot depose./.
+
To//
+
----
+
P ????????
+
 
+
THIS PAGE SEEMS TO BE OUT OF POSITION
+
 
+
===Case: Mayflower vs. XXXX: Deposition: 2. John Stannian, of the City of London; Gentleman, aged 26: Date: September 23rd 1659===
+
 
+
//The 23:th of September 1659
+
Examined upon the fore said allegaccon
+
 
+
2.  JOHN STANNIAN of the vitie of London gent., aged 26
+
yeeres or thereabouts sworne & examined
+
 
+
To the first second and third of the articles of the said allegaccon hee saith and deposeth that hee well
+
remembreth, and that in or about ffebruary or March last was
+
XXXXXXth the Governour and Company of English Merchants trading
+
to East India Imployed and XXX are the said shipp from this port of London
+
on a trading voyage to goe and XXXX to XXXX on the coast of the Island
+
of Sumatra to lade pepper for the said companies account, w;ch
+
hee knoweth having XXXX the said Companies orders and XXXXXX XXX XXX
+
with XX
+
----
+
P1110405 f. XX verso
+
 
+
//To the 2:d. hee saith that hee this Depo:t did in a former voyage
+
carry about three hundred Quintalls of Brazeel wood, from Lisbone
+
to Newhaven for y:e account as hee beleeveth of the said Brazil
+
Companie, and y:t wood was procured Alsoe by the said Roles
+
at the same BXXXXXX; And after, this Depo:te had receaved
+
y:e said3000 Quintalls on board his Ship y;e sd Roles brought
+
him bills of Lading, ready filled up; e:ch this Depo:t signed
+
and ?those w:ch this Depo:t signed for y:e said 200 Quintalls
+
of Wood now in Question; and alsoe for those other goods
+
which hee then procured.  he brought bills of Lading to this
+
Depo:t, ready filled up in Portugueze, (w:ch this
+
Depo:t doth not well understand) and this Depo:t signed y:e same
+
And further cannot depose: /:
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110406
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110407
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
 
+
P1110408 f. 299 verso
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110409
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110410
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110411
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110412
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110413
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110414 f. XXX verso
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
 
+
===Case: The Brazeele frigot vs. XXXX: Deposition: 3. Samuell Sambrooke, of London, Merchant, aged 44: Date: September 24th 1659===
+
 
+
----
+
P1110415
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110416
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110417 f. 3XXX recto
+
 
+
'''Poor quality digital image'''
+
 
+
===Case: The Brazeele frigot vs. XXXX: Deposition: 5. Samuell Sambrooke, of London, Merchant, aged 44: Date: September ?14th 1659===
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110418
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110419
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110420
+
----
+
P1110421 f. 333 recto
+
 
+
'''Poor quality digital image: REIMAGE THIS PAGE'''
+
 
+
===Case: The Brazeele ffrigot ag:t XXXXX: Deposition: John Cocke: Date: September 8th 1659===
+
 
+
//The X:th day of September 1659
+
 
+
The ''Brazille ffrigot'' aforesd
+
 
+
XXXXXX XX
+
 
+
JOHN COOKE a witnes formerly rexamined
+
and now againe Examined in this Cause
+
XXX
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
----
+
P1110422 f. 333 verso
+
 
+
'''High quality digital IMAGE: REIMAGE PAGE SINCE LAST TWO LINE CUT OF MANUSCRIPT CUT OFF IN IMAGE'''
+
 
+
//Many other othings belonging to the said ''Brazil ffrigot''
+
and made her much like a XXXack - And this the
+
said Quares told the said ?Heath before this Depo:t.
+
and many others of the said ''Brazil ffrigotts'' Company $that hee would be as good as his words and give
+
the said ?Heath his ship againe or to that purpose
+
But the said Heath (seeing (sic) the said Ship
+
in such a Condition) refused to take her, doublesse
+
hee might have her in the Condition shee was
+
in, when Shee was taken [Possibly taken is crossed out], from him together with
+
the other things agreed upon, And the said Heath
+
having an Oportunity (sic) to goe in an English Boate
+
from ?Ensechecape to Surrenam, Got leave
+
for passage therein, w:ch the Governo:r of ?Ensecherape
+
hearing of, told the said Heath that if
+
hee would not stay and take his Ship againe in
+
that Condition hee would lay ?him in Irons
+
or to that effect, and soe the said Heath was
+
forced, to receave the said ffrigot in the foresd
+
Condition ?much the XXX a XXXXX;
+
 
+
All w:ch hee Deposeth being at ?Euchecheape the foresaid
+
time & seeing hearing & taking notice of the
+
premisses.  And further cannot depose./.
+
 
+
To the 3:d hee saith y:t ?every ?MillXX Portugall money
+
at ?ffarnambuck in Brazil was and is worth
+
12:s. 6:d. Sterl. money:/
+
 
+
JOHN COOKE  [His signature]
+
 
+
<nowiki>*******************************************</nowiki>
+
===Case: XXXX: Depostion: 11. Thomas Wyat: Date: September 8th 1659===
+
 
+
The same day:
+
 
+
D:?t Bushell
+
 
+
11  THOMAS WYAT a witnes formerly
+
Ex:d and ?now againe Examined in this
+
Cause, upon the foresd Allon. deposeth
+
as followeth by Vertue of his Oath
+
 
+
To the first arle of the said Allon. hee saith and deposeth
+
that after y:e ''Brazil ffrigot'' was carryed to EXXXXX
+
[the M:r of CROSSED OUT IN MANUSCRIPT] The ''BrazIl ffrigot'' and his Company did
+
their utmost endeavo:r to get the said Ship ffreight, and
+
[LAST TWO LINES CUT OFF IN DIGITAL IMAGE]//
+
----
+
P1110423 verso & recto f. 345 verso & f. 346 recto
+
 
+
'''Reasonable quality digital image'''
+
----
+
P1110424 f. ? verso
+
 
+
'''High quality digital image'''
+
 
+
//of this Commonwealth, And for such commonly accorded
+
reputed and taken.  And further cannot answer./
+
 
+
To the 27.:th he saith he hath knowne M:r Blackborow
+
for these two yeares last or thereabouts, and saith he
+
liveth within the Burrough of Siuthwarke near London.
+
And beleeveth hom to be (according to common report)
+
an Englishman and subiect of this Commonwealth.
+
And this dep.:t knoweth that he the s:d Blackborowe
+
and one M:r Shirly doe use the trade of Timber, Balkes
+
masts and other commodities in Norway, and
+
hath credibly heard that they keep ffactors and
+
Agents in some parts of Norway for the trans-
+
porting, the goods aforementioned to this port of
+
London,  And further cannot answere./
+
 
+
To the last he referreth himselfe to his foregoing
+
deposition./
+
 
+
HENRY LOBERY  [His signature]
+
 
+
Repeated before D:r. Godolphin//
+
 
+
<nowiki>*******************************************</nowiki>
+
===Case: The Brazeele frigot vs. XXXX: Deposition: 13. William Bird, of Little St Hellens, London, Merchant, aged 31: Date: September 21st 1659===
+
 
+
//The ''Brazeele frigot'' aforesaid
+
 
+
The 21:th day of September
+
1659:
+
 
+
Examined upon the first Allon
+
given in on behalfe of Edward
+
and John Bushell of London
+
M:rchants, containing 21 articles.
+
 
+
13: WILLIAM BIRD of Little S:t Ellens London
+
M:chant. aged 31 yeares or therr
+
abouts a witnes sworne and examined saith
+
and deposeth by vertue of his oath
+
as followeth viz:t
+
 
+
To the third article of the said Allon upon w:ch
+
alone he is (by dirrection from the producents Proctor)
+
examined, he saith that at Lisbone in or about
+
the moneth of May 1657 before the said ships
+
departure thence for the parts of Brazeele it was
+
by Charter partie covenanted and agreed on betwixt
+
Thomas Heath (Comand:r of y:e sd ship) on behalfe of M:r
+
Edward & M:r John Bushell; and one Man?oel AbXXX
+
e Mosia freighter of her the voyage in question, that
+
the//
+
----
+
P1110425
+
f. 326 recto
+
 
+
'''Very poor quality digital image'''
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
 
+
<nowiki>*********************************************</nowiki>
+
 
+
ADD TEXT
+
 
+
//
+
 
+
----
+
==Notes==
+

Latest revision as of 05:41, June 6, 2012

  1. redirect HCA 13/73 Part One