Difference between revisions of "HCA 13/70 f.235r Annotate"
m |
m |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
without the consent of the sayd Maples who told them hee would get his | without the consent of the sayd Maples who told them hee would get his | ||
sayd shipp repayred with all speede And further hee cannot answere not | sayd shipp repayred with all speede And further hee cannot answere not | ||
− | knowing nor having heard of any | + | knowing nor having heard of any protest made by the sayd Maples/ |
Repeated before doctors Clarke and doctor Godolphin/ | Repeated before doctors Clarke and doctor Godolphin/ |
Revision as of 11:30, January 4, 2015
Volume | HCA 13/70 |
---|---|
Folio | 235 |
Side | Recto |
← Previous Page | |
Status | |
First cut transcription started and completed on 04/01/15 by Colin Greenstreet | |
First transcriber | |
Colin Greenstreet | |
Editorial history | |
Created 26/08/14, by CSG |
Contents
[hide]Expand this area to see details of page purpose, how to register, how to add footnotes, and useful links.
Image
Transcription
To the second Interrogatorie hee saith that the Interrogate Bartlet and Company
(who sue for wages in this cause) after they had as is predeposed required of
the foresayd William Maples part of their wages due to them to buy thenm
necessaries and sawe that hee denyed to pay them any, and well seeing that
the shipp Thomas and Lucie was much decayed and not fitt to goe upon a tradeing
voyage without much cost and tyme spent in the repayreing and fitting of her
to goe to sea, did refuse to staye in the sayd shipp and deserted her
without the consent of the sayd Maples who told them hee would get his
sayd shipp repayred with all speede And further hee cannot answere not
knowing nor having heard of any protest made by the sayd Maples/
Repeated before doctors Clarke and doctor Godolphin/
James Salmon [SIGNATURE, RH SIDE]
*********************************
The 25th of January 1654 English style
Examined upon the sayd libell./