Difference between revisions of "HCA 13/73 f.268r Annotate"

From MarineLives
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 15: Line 15:
 
|Transcription image=P1110XXX
 
|Transcription image=P1110XXX
  
−
|Transcription=ADD TEXT
+
|Transcription=Power, and under their Command neither the said Thomas
 +
Newman y:e Supra Cargoe of the said Ship Bantam ffrigot nor the
 +
said Isaac Taylor y:e captaine of the said ship ?or any of
 +
y:e Marine.rs of her did doe any Injury or Wrong in
 +
any Kinde to the said Dutch or any of them. ?that this
 +
depo:t knoweth if. but did XXXXX them selves Civily
 +
and peaceably towards them and this hee XXXXX
 +
being M:r Mate of y:e said ship y:e said Voyage And
 +
further cannot depose:
 +
 
 +
To the 31:th hee Cannot depose
 +
 
 +
To the 32:th he saith his foregoeing depon is true
 +
 
 +
Repetit before D:r Godolphon
 +
 
 +
CALIB XXXXX [His signature]
 +
 
 +
<nowiki>************************************************</nowiki>
 +
Case: S:r John Dethick Knight, Edward Bolle, John Bancks Richard ffoord, Edward Mico, William ?Pretman and Company, concerning the Bantam ffrigott: Deposition: 2. Lewis Walter, of Deptford, Mariner, aged 40 : Date: March 25th 1658
 +
 
 +
The 25:th day of March 1659
 +
 
 +
Examined on the said Allon
 +
 
 +
2:us LEWIS WALTER of Deptford Mariner
 +
aged 40 yeeres or thereabouts: sworne and Examined:/:
 +
 
 +
To the first arle of the said Allon hee saith that XX XXX monethes
 +
of September, October, November. Decembe:r January ffeb:ry
 +
and March 16?46. English Stile and Continually since the
 +
arlate S:r John Dethick Knight XXXXX John Banckks Richard fford
 +
Edward Mico & Willaim Prittman, and Company, or some
 +
of them, (being all subjects of this Commonwealth) were
 +
and at present are the true and lawfull owners and
 +
Imployers of the arlate BANTAM FFRIGO:T and of her tackle
 +
and furniture as hee verily beleeveth, and soe hee saith
 +
they were and are Commonly accounted: And This hee
 +
deposeth for that hee wenta ll the Voyage in question
 +
Steward of the said Bantam ffrigot. and further cannot depose
 +
 
 +
To the second hee saith that in the said moneth of October
 +
1656: the foresaid S:r John Dethick, John Banks; Richard
 +
fford Edward Mico and William Prittman (who are all of
 +
them well knowne to this Depo:t) and alsoe y:e arlate Edward
 +
Bolle: did set out the said ship from this port of London
 +
upon their owne account to East India there to Lade XXXX
 +
and bring y:e same to Europe; for their Account, And
 +
saith that the said Setters forth of the said ship did Appoint
 +
y:e arlate Isaac Tailo:r to goe M:r of the said ship and the
 +
arlate Thomas Newman Supra Cargoe of her the said
 +
voyage, And the said Taylor & Newman did goe y:e said Voyage
 +
in y:e said ship. in their said Apointed Place. The premises
 +
he deposeth for the said S:r John Dethick and the rest of the XXX
 +
aforesd did from XXX come on board y:e sd Shipp, before and at XXX XXXX
  
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 08:42, August 15, 2013

Volume HCA 13/73
Folio 268
Side Recto
← Previous Page

Status
First cut transcription started and completed on 15/08/13 by Colin Greenstreet
Languages
Note
none
First transcriber
Colin Greenstreet
First transcribed
13 /08/15
Editorial history
Created 15/08/13, by CSG
[Expand]

Expand this area to see details of page purpose, how to register, how to add footnotes, and useful links.

Image

P1110XXX

Transcription

Power, and under their Command neither the said Thomas
Newman y:e Supra Cargoe of the said Ship Bantam ffrigot nor the
said Isaac Taylor y:e captaine of the said ship ?or any of
y:e Marine.rs of her did doe any Injury or Wrong in
any Kinde to the said Dutch or any of them. ?that this
depo:t knoweth if. but did XXXXX them selves Civily
and peaceably towards them and this hee XXXXX
being M:r Mate of y:e said ship y:e said Voyage And
further cannot depose:

To the 31:th hee Cannot depose

To the 32:th he saith his foregoeing depon is true

Repetit before D:r Godolphon

CALIB XXXXX [His signature]

************************************************
Case: S:r John Dethick Knight, Edward Bolle, John Bancks Richard ffoord, Edward Mico, William ?Pretman and Company, concerning the Bantam ffrigott: Deposition: 2. Lewis Walter, of Deptford, Mariner, aged 40 : Date: March 25th 1658

The 25:th day of March 1659

Examined on the said Allon

2:us LEWIS WALTER of Deptford Mariner
aged 40 yeeres or thereabouts: sworne and Examined:/:

To the first arle of the said Allon hee saith that XX XXX monethes
of September, October, November. Decembe:r January ffeb:ry
and March 16?46. English Stile and Continually since the
arlate S:r John Dethick Knight XXXXX John Banckks Richard fford
Edward Mico & Willaim Prittman, and Company, or some
of them, (being all subjects of this Commonwealth) were
and at present are the true and lawfull owners and
Imployers of the arlate BANTAM FFRIGO:T and of her tackle
and furniture as hee verily beleeveth, and soe hee saith
they were and are Commonly accounted: And This hee
deposeth for that hee wenta ll the Voyage in question
Steward of the said Bantam ffrigot. and further cannot depose

To the second hee saith that in the said moneth of October
1656: the foresaid S:r John Dethick, John Banks; Richard
fford Edward Mico and William Prittman (who are all of
them well knowne to this Depo:t) and alsoe y:e arlate Edward
Bolle: did set out the said ship from this port of London
upon their owne account to East India there to Lade XXXX
and bring y:e same to Europe; for their Account, And
saith that the said Setters forth of the said ship did Appoint
y:e arlate Isaac Tailo:r to goe M:r of the said ship and the
arlate Thomas Newman Supra Cargoe of her the said
voyage, And the said Taylor & Newman did goe y:e said Voyage
in y:e said ship. in their said Apointed Place. The premises
he deposeth for the said S:r John Dethick and the rest of the XXX
aforesd did from XXX come on board y:e sd Shipp, before and at XXX XXXX

Retrieved from ‘http://www.marinelives.org/index.php?title=HCA_13/73_f.268r_Annotate&oldid=65484’