Difference between revisions of "Project Goals"
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
08/08/12: WT, created page | 08/08/12: WT, created page | ||
---- | ---- | ||
+ | __TOC__ | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | '''Purpose of this page''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | This page sets out the primary goals of the project. It also suggests standards by which we should measure our performance against these goals and seeks a discussion of these proposed standards and measurement processes with the project team | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | ==Suggested links== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | ==Project Goals== | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | ===What have we said?=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Our website:''' "MarineLives is an innovative academic project for the collaborative transcription, linkage and enrichment of primary manuscripts, which were originated in the High Court of Admiralty, London, 1650-1669. The end product will be a publicly and freely available online academic edition." | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | ===Two primary goals=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * '''Content:''' Delivery of a public and freely available online academic edition (within reasonable time) | ||
+ | |||
+ | * '''Process:''' Develop and demonstrate effective innovative approach to collaborative transcription, linkage and enrichment of primary documents | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | ==Suggested standards== | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | ===Content=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Quality of textual output | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Quantity of textual output | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | ===Process=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Creativeness, effectiveness and efficiency of project process | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | ===Energy=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Unanticipated benefits | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | ==Possible measurement== | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | ===Content=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Nominate named expert individuals in advance, not directly involved in the project, to assess the quality of the content? | ||
+ | |||
+ | - Who? | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Benchmark the quality and quantity of the content against other reference content; the reference content to be agreed in advance? | ||
+ | |||
+ | - What content? How define quality? | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Willingness of academics to formally cite content from MarineLives project? | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Self-evaluation by team members of quality of content? | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | ===Process=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Creativeness: | ||
+ | |||
+ | - Evaluation by named expert individuals of project processes? | ||
+ | - Self-evaluation by team members of creativity of project processes? | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Effectiveness: | ||
+ | |||
+ | - Deliver desired content goals? | ||
+ | - Objective feedback solicited from team members following conclusion of the project regarding the project experience? | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Efficiency: | ||
+ | |||
+ | - Output relative to input costs (total monetary costs; and money equivalent of volunteer time and other resources voluntarily made available to the project)? | ||
+ | - Extent to which rework is avoided in the project? | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | ===Energy=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Undergraduate dissertation topics influenced by involvement of undergraduate project associates in MarineLives? | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Journals article submitted and approved making reference to the MarineLives project? | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Year thirteen student admissions to university assisted by involvement of school students in MarineLives? | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Potential funders (individuals and/or companies and/or institutions) approach core team following project seeking to explore possible funding of a project extension or project spinoff? | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Desire of project participants to work together again? | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | ==Questions to project team== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * What transcription productivity targets should we set ourselves? | ||
+ | |||
+ | - Individual productivity? | ||
+ | - Facilitator team productivity? | ||
+ | |||
+ | - Minutes/hours per standard page for first cut unedited transcription? | ||
+ | - Minutes/hours per standard page for first full edit? | ||
+ | - Minutes/hours per standard page for page signoff? | ||
+ | |||
+ | * How should we expect productivity of indiduals and teams to change over fourteen week project? | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | [[Comments]] | ||
+ | ------ |
Revision as of 10:20, August 13, 2012
Project Goals
Editorial history
08/08/12: WT, created page
Contents
[hide]Purpose of this page
This page sets out the primary goals of the project. It also suggests standards by which we should measure our performance against these goals and seeks a discussion of these proposed standards and measurement processes with the project team
Suggested links
Project Goals
What have we said?
Our website: "MarineLives is an innovative academic project for the collaborative transcription, linkage and enrichment of primary manuscripts, which were originated in the High Court of Admiralty, London, 1650-1669. The end product will be a publicly and freely available online academic edition."
Two primary goals
- Content: Delivery of a public and freely available online academic edition (within reasonable time)
- Process: Develop and demonstrate effective innovative approach to collaborative transcription, linkage and enrichment of primary documents
Suggested standards
Content
- Quality of textual output
- Quantity of textual output
Process
- Creativeness, effectiveness and efficiency of project process
Energy
- Unanticipated benefits
Possible measurement
Content
- Nominate named expert individuals in advance, not directly involved in the project, to assess the quality of the content?
- Who?
- Benchmark the quality and quantity of the content against other reference content; the reference content to be agreed in advance?
- What content? How define quality?
- Willingness of academics to formally cite content from MarineLives project?
- Self-evaluation by team members of quality of content?
Process
- Creativeness:
- Evaluation by named expert individuals of project processes?
- Self-evaluation by team members of creativity of project processes?
- Effectiveness:
- Deliver desired content goals?
- Objective feedback solicited from team members following conclusion of the project regarding the project experience?
- Efficiency:
- Output relative to input costs (total monetary costs; and money equivalent of volunteer time and other resources voluntarily made available to the project)?
- Extent to which rework is avoided in the project?
Energy
- Undergraduate dissertation topics influenced by involvement of undergraduate project associates in MarineLives?
- Journals article submitted and approved making reference to the MarineLives project?
- Year thirteen student admissions to university assisted by involvement of school students in MarineLives?
- Potential funders (individuals and/or companies and/or institutions) approach core team following project seeking to explore possible funding of a project extension or project spinoff?
- Desire of project participants to work together again?
Questions to project team
- What transcription productivity targets should we set ourselves?
- Individual productivity?
- Facilitator team productivity?
- Minutes/hours per standard page for first cut unedited transcription?
- Minutes/hours per standard page for first full edit?
- Minutes/hours per standard page for page signoff?
- How should we expect productivity of indiduals and teams to change over fourteen week project?