Difference between revisions of "HCA 13/71 f.28v Annotate"

From MarineLives
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
 
(23 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Folio=28
 
|Folio=28
 
|Side=Verso
 
|Side=Verso
|Status=First cut trascription started on 27/12/12 and and completed on 28/12/12 by Colin Greenstreet; edited by Jill Wilcox 18/8/13; pated into wikispot on 28/03/14 by Colin Greenstreet
+
|Status=Uploaded image; transcribed on 28/12/2012
 
+
 
|First transcriber=Colin Greenstreet
 
|First transcriber=Colin Greenstreet
 
 
|First transcribed=12/12/28
 
|First transcribed=12/12/28
 
+
|Editorial history=Edited by Jill Wilcox 18/8/2013 and on 26/04/14 by Colin Greenstreet
|Editorial history=Created 19/12/13, by CSG
+
|Note=IMAGE: P1080942.JPG
 
+
}}
}}{{PageHelp}}
+
{{PageHelp}}
 
{{PageTranscription
 
{{PageTranscription
|Transcription image=P1140340
+
|Transcription image={{#transcription-image: P1080942.JPG}}
 
+
 
|Transcription=To the 10th article he saith he ćannot depose.
 
|Transcription=To the 10th article he saith he ćannot depose.
  
Line 23: Line 20:
 
pounds.
 
pounds.
  
To the 12th he saith that the arlate Germans was shipped as and for Cooper of
+
To the 12th he saith that the arlate [G[?e]rma[?ns] was shipped as and for Cooper of
 
the sayd shipp. And that the sayd John Gridden did alsoe hire one Ridde
 
the sayd shipp. And that the sayd John Gridden did alsoe hire one Ridde
 
to doe some Coopers worke aboard the sayd shipp att the Barbadoes. And
 
to doe some Coopers worke aboard the sayd shipp att the Barbadoes. And
Line 37: Line 34:
 
To the Crosse Interrogatories. [CENTRE HEADING]
 
To the Crosse Interrogatories. [CENTRE HEADING]
  
To the first he saith he was and is ˹a˺ servant and apprentice to the sayd John Gridden
+
To the first he saith he was and is a servant and apprentice to the sayd John Gridden
 
and wisheth that the Judges and the law may decide and judge this cause justly
 
and wisheth that the Judges and the law may decide and judge this cause justly
 
betwixt the parties. And otherwise cannot answer
 
betwixt the parties. And otherwise cannot answer
Line 65: Line 62:
 
James Moulton [SIGNATURE, RH SIDE]
 
James Moulton [SIGNATURE, RH SIDE]
  
<nowiki>*******************************</nowiki>
+
&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;&#42;
  
 
The third day of March .1655. &#91;CENTRE HEADING&#93;
 
The third day of March .1655. &#91;CENTRE HEADING&#93;
Line 82: Line 79:
  
 
To the fifth and sixth articles of the sayd allegation, This deponent saith that the direct
 
To the fifth and sixth articles of the sayd allegation, This deponent saith that the direct
way to come from Salina Road in Ciprus ˹for London˺ is to come to the Straights mouth, and
+
way to come from Salina Road in Ciprus for London is to come to the Straights mouth, and
 
so much is notorious; And he saith that in case the arlate George Hughes the
 
so much is notorious; And he saith that in case the arlate George Hughes the
 
voyage in question had sayled his shipp either directly to the Streights mouth
 
voyage in question had sayled his shipp either directly to the Streights mouth
 
or when he came to Zant if he had then gone directly to the Streights
 
or when he came to Zant if he had then gone directly to the Streights
 
mouth he had not come to Corsica, And so much he knoweth to be true
 
mouth he had not come to Corsica, And so much he knoweth to be true
having formerly used these seas in severall shipps: And otherwise he
+
having formerly used these seas in severall shipps&#58; And otherwise he
 
ćannot depose.
 
ćannot depose.
  
 
To the 7th article of the sayd allegation, This deponent saith that to sayle from Salina Road
 
To the 7th article of the sayd allegation, This deponent saith that to sayle from Salina Road
to the Streights mouth is about XXXXX ˹six˺ hundred ˹forty four˺ leagues and so aććounted, and
+
to the Streights mouth is about six hundred forty four leagues and so accounted, and
 
to sayle from thense first to Zant, and so to the Streights mouth is about
 
to sayle from thense first to Zant, and so to the Streights mouth is about
 
six hundred sixty one leagues and so aććounted. which he knoweth having used the sayd
 
six hundred sixty one leagues and so aććounted. which he knoweth having used the sayd
Line 97: Line 94:
  
 
To
 
To
 +
|People=<u>Bridgett Lutton</u>
  
|People=<u>Emanuell Lutton</u>
+
Bridgett Lutton was the wife of James Lutton by her second marriage. Her first marriage (according to James Lutton's will) had been to Henry Hodgkin, by whom she had a son (Ralph) and a daughter (Sarah). She had two daughters by James Lutton (Christian and Elizabeth).  She survived her husband's death (1663), with her own will proved in 1668.  Consequently, she appears in the Kent Heath Tax records for Lady Day 1664 as a widow, living in East Lane East in Greenwich in a sizeable property with twelve hearths.<ref>PROB 11/328/355 Will of Bridgett Lutton, Widow of East Greenwich, Kent 24 November 1668</ref>
  
Emanuell Lutton is named in James Lutton's will (1663) as the living brother of James, and is linked in the will to land in Devonshire.  This would be consistent with an Emanuel (sic) Lutton, who is named in Thomas Colby's ''Visitation of the county of Devon in the year 1620'' as the eldest son of Emanuel Lutton of Cofford in the parish of Kenton [Devonshire]. Emanuel's age is given as twenty in the year of the visitation, with brothers James (16), John (14), Francis (10) and Richard (7), and sisters Mary (18) and Elizabeth (9).[[FootNote([https://archive.org/stream/visitationcount02camdgoog#page/n191/mode/2up Frederick Thomas Colby (ed.), The visitation of the county of Devon in the year 1620 (London, 1872), p.173]), viewed 15/04/14]]
+
[[File:Kent_Hearth_Tax_1664_Harrington_p22.JPG|thumbnail|480px|none|[http://www.hearthtax.org.uk/communities/kent/kent_1664L_transcript.pdf Duncan Harrington (trans.), Kent Hearth Tax Assessment Lady Day 1664, p.23]]]
  
 +
<u>Emanuell Lutton</u>
  
 +
Emanuell Lutton is named in James Lutton's will (1663) as the living brother of James, and is linked in the will to land in Devonshire.  This would be consistent with an Emanuel (sic) Lutton, who is named in Thomas Colby's ''Visitation of the county of Devon in the year 1620'' as the eldest son of Emanuel Lutton of Cofford in the parish of Kenton [Devonshire]. Emanuel's age is given as twenty in the year of the visitation, with brothers James (16), John (14), Francis (10) and Richard (7), and sisters Mary (18) and Elizabeth (9).<ref>[https://archive.org/stream/visitationcount02camdgoog#page/n191/mode/2up Frederick Thomas Colby (ed.), The visitation of the county of Devon in the year 1620 (London, 1872), p.173], viewed 15/04/14</ref>
 +
 +
[[File:Lutton_Visitation_Devonshire_1620_Colby_1672_p173.JPG|thumbnail|500px|none|[https://archive.org/stream/visitationcount02camdgoog#page/n191/mode/2up Frederick Thomas Colby (ed.), The visitation of the county of Devon in the year 1620 (London, 1872), p.173]]]
  
 
<u>James Lutton</u>
 
<u>James Lutton</u>
Line 108: Line 110:
 
James Lutton described himself in his will as a "gentleman" of East Greenwich. Kent.  He referred in his will to property in Greenwich, Salisbury and Devon, and to investment in shipping.<ref>PROB 11/312/242 Will of James Lutton, Gentleman of East Greenwich, Kent 21 October 1663</ref> The same will identified his wife as Bridgett, whose own will was proved five years later in 1668.<ref>PROB 11/328/355 Will of Bridgett Lutton, Widow of East Greenwich, Kent 24 November 1668</ref>
 
James Lutton described himself in his will as a "gentleman" of East Greenwich. Kent.  He referred in his will to property in Greenwich, Salisbury and Devon, and to investment in shipping.<ref>PROB 11/312/242 Will of James Lutton, Gentleman of East Greenwich, Kent 21 October 1663</ref> The same will identified his wife as Bridgett, whose own will was proved five years later in 1668.<ref>PROB 11/328/355 Will of Bridgett Lutton, Widow of East Greenwich, Kent 24 November 1668</ref>
  
James Lutton's will identifies a brother (Emanuell Lutton), with whom James Lutton had a mortgage of lands in DEvonshire. The will also identifies "Cosen James [Lutton]", who was to redeem the emortgage, and a further male cosin (Mr Thomas Cullen).
+
In his deposition of March 1655(56), James Lutton gave his age as "fifty three yeares or thereabouts", which is broadly consistent with the age of sixteen for the James Lutton of Kenton, Devonshire, given in Thomas Colby's ''Visitation of the county of Devon in the year 1620''.<ref>[https://archive.org/stream/visitationcount02camdgoog#page/n191/mode/2up Frederick Thomas Colby (ed.), The visitation of the county of Devon in the year 1620 (London, 1872), p.173], viewed 15/04/14</ref>
 +
 
 +
James Lutton's will identifies a brother (Emanuell Lutton), with whom James Lutton had a mortgage of lands in Devonshire. The will also identifies "Cosen James [Lutton]", who was to redeem the mortgage, and a further male cousin (Mr Thomas Cullen).
  
 
James Lutton had two daughters by his wife Bridgett, and one daughter, who was the child of his wife's first husband, the deceased Henry Hodgkin. The first biological daughter is named in the will as Christian Lutton, together with her intended husband (Ralph Hodgkin). Unusually, the intended husband was Bridgett Lutton's son by her former husband. A second biological daughter is named as Elizabeth Lutton. The daughter by the wife's first husband is named as Sarah Hodgkin.
 
James Lutton had two daughters by his wife Bridgett, and one daughter, who was the child of his wife's first husband, the deceased Henry Hodgkin. The first biological daughter is named in the will as Christian Lutton, together with her intended husband (Ralph Hodgkin). Unusually, the intended husband was Bridgett Lutton's son by her former husband. A second biological daughter is named as Elizabeth Lutton. The daughter by the wife's first husband is named as Sarah Hodgkin.
Line 115: Line 119:
  
 
Bridgett Lutton was named the sole executrix. The will was written when "at present sicke and weake in body", and signed and dated September 7th 1663. It was proved a month later on October 21st 1663.
 
Bridgett Lutton was named the sole executrix. The will was written when "at present sicke and weake in body", and signed and dated September 7th 1663. It was proved a month later on October 21st 1663.
 +
|Places=<u>East Lane, East Greenwich</u>
 +
 +
In his 1655 deposition in the English Admiralty Court James gave his residence as "East Greenwich".  However, the Kent Hearth Tax records for Lady Day 1664 enable us to identify Lutton's residence more precisely as East Lane East in East Greenwich, where his widow resided, in a sizeable property with twelve hearths. This was a fashionable area, inhabited by a number of leading London merchants and mariners.  East Greenwich neighbours included the merchant Sir Theophilus Biddulph (in a twenty-one hearth residence in East Lane East, East Greenwich), the London merchant Benjamin Glanvill (of Devon origins, in a twelve hearth residence in Dock and Taverne Rowe, East Greenwich), and the London merchant Mr Nicholas Cooke.
 +
 +
Chancery Court records exist for a legal dispute between a William Glanvile and a James, Joan and William Lutton. It is possible that this William Glanvile was related to Benjamin Glanvill, who was a major London merchant trading in tin, and that the dispute involved Captain James Lutton and relatives.
  
 +
[[File:Roque_Map_Greenwich_1695_Travers_1810_Detail_150414.JPG|thumbnail|500px|none|[http://www.ideal-homes.org.uk/__data/assets/image/0019/301483/map-01275-1339.jpg Detail, Greenwich section of John Roque's Map of London (1695), copy by Samuel Travers (1810)]]]
 
|Primary sources='''TNA'''
 
|Primary sources='''TNA'''
  
Line 121: Line 131:
  
 
C 5/409/85 Short title: Glanvile v Lutton. Plaintiffs: William Glanvile. Defendants: James Lutton, Joan Lutton, widow, and William Lutton. Subject: property in Kenton, Devon. Document type: bill, answer. 1658
 
C 5/409/85 Short title: Glanvile v Lutton. Plaintiffs: William Glanvile. Defendants: James Lutton, Joan Lutton, widow, and William Lutton. Subject: property in Kenton, Devon. Document type: bill, answer. 1658
 +
- This record is consistent with details of the Lutton family given in Frederick Thomas Colby (ed.), ''The visitation of the county of Devon in the year 1620'' (London, 1872), p.173
  
 
C 10/487/159 Murthwaite and Hide v Reynolds, Lenthall, Moore, Lutton and others: Kent. 1662
 
C 10/487/159 Murthwaite and Hide v Reynolds, Lenthall, Moore, Lutton and others: Kent. 1662
Line 126: Line 137:
 
C 22/77/10 Glanville v Lutton. Depositions taken in the country. 1649 - 1684
 
C 22/77/10 Glanville v Lutton. Depositions taken in the country. 1649 - 1684
 
C 22/77/31 Glanville v Lutton. Depositions taken in the country. 1649 - 1684
 
C 22/77/31 Glanville v Lutton. Depositions taken in the country. 1649 - 1684
 +
- These records are consistent with details of the Lutton family given in Frederick Thomas Colby (ed.), ''The visitation of the county of Devon in the year 1620'' (London, 1872), p.173
  
 
<u>PROB</u>
 
<u>PROB</u>
Line 133: Line 145:
 
PROB 11/328/355 Will of Bridgett Lutton, Widow of East Greenwich, Kent 24 November 1668
 
PROB 11/328/355 Will of Bridgett Lutton, Widow of East Greenwich, Kent 24 November 1668
 
PROB 11/327/573 Sentence of Brigetta Lutton, Widow of East Greenwich, Kent 13 November 1668
 
PROB 11/327/573 Sentence of Brigetta Lutton, Widow of East Greenwich, Kent 13 November 1668
 
|Suggested links=[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AoNoOr05QRMtdHAyNmxuVnNmYkJ3Q0ZiNEQ0R0V2S3c#gid=0 HCA 13/71 Page Log & Planner]
 
[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AoNoOr05QRMtdFlXNjQ3ekM0WW5NS1oyN250QUpJd0E#gid=0 HCA 3/47 Page Log & Planner]
 
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 08:47, May 20, 2015

Expand this area to see details of page purpose, how to register, how to add footnotes, and useful links.




Purpose

This page is for the annotation of HCA 13/71 f.28v.

Annotations can be viewed by everyone on a read-only basis.

For more information on MarineLives and the MarineLives Annotation Project read our Shipping News blog entries:

Annotating Marine Lives, May 1st 2013
Adding value to primary documents, May 8th 2013
Witnesses in Court, 1657-1658 (May 9th, 2013)




Registration to annotate documents

Registration is required to contribute annotations to this page and to other pages in the wiki.

You can register using the following Form, and we will issue you with a UserName and Password for the wiki.




Text formatting

The MarineLives transcription platform is built on MediaWiki, which uses wiki markup to format text. For a guide showing how to produce italics, bold, escaped text and headings, see the MediaWiki page on formatting; there are also guides for internal and external links, image embedding, tables, and more on lists.




Adding footnotes

  • Go into edit mode
  • Insert immediately after the sentence or phrase you wish to annotate the following macro:<ref>This is the footnote text</ref>
  • Replace 'This is the footnote text' with the footnote you wish to add, using the format: first name, surname, title, (place of publication, date of publication), page or folio number
  • Save the page


For more information and advanced formatting, including how to add and format links within the footnote, see the Wikipedia help on footnotes. This uses the same markup formatting.

Example footnote template:

  • ''HCA 13/XX f.XXXX Case: XXXX; Deposition: XXXX; Date: XXXX. Transcribed by XXXX''<ref>[http://XXXXX Electronic link to a digital source]</ref>




Suggested links

Annotate HCA 13/64 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/65 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/68 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/69 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/70 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/71 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/72 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/73 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/74 Volume Page
Marine Lives Tools

Image

HCA 13/71 f.28v: Right click on image for full size image in separate window

Transcription

To the 10th article he saith he ćannot depose.

To the 11th article he saith that there was some wages payd to some of the sayd
shipps Company att Naples. And further or otherwise he ćannot depose
saving that he hath heard the sayd John Gridden say that the Chirugions
Chest belonging to the arlate Joseph Hobbs cost the sayd Owners seven
pounds.

To the 12th he saith that the arlate [G[?e]rma[?ns] was shipped as and for Cooper of
the sayd shipp. And that the sayd John Gridden did alsoe hire one Ridde
to doe some Coopers worke aboard the sayd shipp att the Barbadoes. And
otherwise he cannot depose.

To the 13th article he saith that the arlate White was Carpenter of the sayd shipp
and had the Carpenters store in his charge. and the said Thomas was Gunner
of the sayd shipp and had the charge of the Gunners store. And further or
otherwise he cannot depose.

To the last hee saith his foresayd deposition is true.

To the Crosse Interrogatories. [CENTRE HEADING]

To the first he saith he was and is a servant and apprentice to the sayd John Gridden
and wisheth that the Judges and the law may decide and judge this cause justly
betwixt the parties. And otherwise cannot answer

To the 2d. he saith he was of the Company of the sayd shipp as a servant to his sayd
master John Gridden, and not otherwise, and doth not know for what voyage
the sayd White or any other of the mariners were hired for. And otherwise
he cannot answer.

To the 3d. he saith he never heard that the sayd shipp was to returne from the
Barbadoes to the Straits before the sayd shipp arrived att the Barbadoes
as aforesayd. And otherwise or further he cannot answer.

To the 4th. he saith he heard not the parties interrogate (so farr as he remembreth)
to say and alledge as a reason of their refusall to goe to Genoa, that they
were hired to returne directly for England. And further, saving his
foregoeing depositions to which he referreth himselfe, he ćannot answer.

To the 5th. he saith that it is usuall as he conceyveth and convenient that
a Chirugion of a shipp goe a shoare in Port to furnish him selfe with
necessaries for his art. And otherwise he ćannot answer.

To the 6th. he saith he did heare aboard the sayd shipp that Joseph Hobbes
interrate was the servant and apprentice of one Mr Young. And otherwise
he cannot depose or answer.

James Moulton [SIGNATURE, RH SIDE]

*******************************

The third day of March .1655. [CENTRE HEADING]

Alderman Frederick and others}
against Keat Jennings and others}
Budd Smith}

Examined upon an allegation on the behalfe of the Alderman frederick and others

1

Captaine James Lutton of East Greenwich in the County of kent mariner
aged fifty three yeares or thereabouts a witness produced
sworne and examined saith as followeth.

To the fifth and sixth articles of the sayd allegation, This deponent saith that the direct
way to come from Salina Road in Ciprus for London is to come to the Straights mouth, and
so much is notorious; And he saith that in case the arlate George Hughes the
voyage in question had sayled his shipp either directly to the Streights mouth
or when he came to Zant if he had then gone directly to the Streights
mouth he had not come to Corsica, And so much he knoweth to be true
having formerly used these seas in severall shipps: And otherwise he
ćannot depose.

To the 7th article of the sayd allegation, This deponent saith that to sayle from Salina Road
to the Streights mouth is about six hundred forty four leagues and so accounted, and
to sayle from thense first to Zant, and so to the Streights mouth is about
six hundred sixty one leagues and so aććounted. which he knoweth having used the sayd
seas as aforesayd. And otherwise he cannot depose.

To

Topics

People


Bridgett Lutton

Bridgett Lutton was the wife of James Lutton by her second marriage. Her first marriage (according to James Lutton's will) had been to Henry Hodgkin, by whom she had a son (Ralph) and a daughter (Sarah). She had two daughters by James Lutton (Christian and Elizabeth). She survived her husband's death (1663), with her own will proved in 1668. Consequently, she appears in the Kent Heath Tax records for Lady Day 1664 as a widow, living in East Lane East in Greenwich in a sizeable property with twelve hearths.[1]

Duncan Harrington (trans.), Kent Hearth Tax Assessment Lady Day 1664, p.23 Emanuell Lutton Emanuell Lutton is named in James Lutton's will (1663) as the living brother of James, and is linked in the will to land in Devonshire. This would be consistent with an Emanuel (sic) Lutton, who is named in Thomas Colby's Visitation of the county of Devon in the year 1620 as the eldest son of Emanuel Lutton of Cofford in the parish of Kenton [Devonshire]. Emanuel's age is given as twenty in the year of the visitation, with brothers James (16), John (14), Francis (10) and Richard (7), and sisters Mary (18) and Elizabeth (9).[2] James Lutton James Lutton described himself in his will as a "gentleman" of East Greenwich. Kent. He referred in his will to property in Greenwich, Salisbury and Devon, and to investment in shipping.[3] The same will identified his wife as Bridgett, whose own will was proved five years later in 1668.[4] In his deposition of March 1655(56), James Lutton gave his age as "fifty three yeares or thereabouts", which is broadly consistent with the age of sixteen for the James Lutton of Kenton, Devonshire, given in Thomas Colby's Visitation of the county of Devon in the year 1620.[5] James Lutton's will identifies a brother (Emanuell Lutton), with whom James Lutton had a mortgage of lands in Devonshire. The will also identifies "Cosen James [Lutton]", who was to redeem the mortgage, and a further male cousin (Mr Thomas Cullen). James Lutton had two daughters by his wife Bridgett, and one daughter, who was the child of his wife's first husband, the deceased Henry Hodgkin. The first biological daughter is named in the will as Christian Lutton, together with her intended husband (Ralph Hodgkin). Unusually, the intended husband was Bridgett Lutton's son by her former husband. A second biological daughter is named as Elizabeth Lutton. The daughter by the wife's first husband is named as Sarah Hodgkin. James Lutton identifies the parish of Kenton in Devonshire as the place of his birth, and makes a charitable gift to this parish as well as to the parish of East Greenwich. Bridgett Lutton was named the sole executrix. The will was written when "at present sicke and weake in body", and signed and dated September 7th 1663. It was proved a month later on October 21st 1663.

Places


East Lane, East Greenwich

In his 1655 deposition in the English Admiralty Court James gave his residence as "East Greenwich". However, the Kent Hearth Tax records for Lady Day 1664 enable us to identify Lutton's residence more precisely as East Lane East in East Greenwich, where his widow resided, in a sizeable property with twelve hearths. This was a fashionable area, inhabited by a number of leading London merchants and mariners. East Greenwich neighbours included the merchant Sir Theophilus Biddulph (in a twenty-one hearth residence in East Lane East, East Greenwich), the London merchant Benjamin Glanvill (of Devon origins, in a twelve hearth residence in Dock and Taverne Rowe, East Greenwich), and the London merchant Mr Nicholas Cooke.

Chancery Court records exist for a legal dispute between a William Glanvile and a James, Joan and William Lutton. It is possible that this William Glanvile was related to Benjamin Glanvill, who was a major London merchant trading in tin, and that the dispute involved Captain James Lutton and relatives.

Sources

Primary sources


TNA

Chancery

C 5/409/85 Short title: Glanvile v Lutton. Plaintiffs: William Glanvile. Defendants: James Lutton, Joan Lutton, widow, and William Lutton. Subject: property in Kenton, Devon. Document type: bill, answer. 1658
- This record is consistent with details of the Lutton family given in Frederick Thomas Colby (ed.), The visitation of the county of Devon in the year 1620 (London, 1872), p.173

C 10/487/159 Murthwaite and Hide v Reynolds, Lenthall, Moore, Lutton and others: Kent. 1662

C 22/77/10 Glanville v Lutton. Depositions taken in the country. 1649 - 1684
C 22/77/31 Glanville v Lutton. Depositions taken in the country. 1649 - 1684
- These records are consistent with details of the Lutton family given in Frederick Thomas Colby (ed.), The visitation of the county of Devon in the year 1620 (London, 1872), p.173

PROB

PROB 11/312/242 Will of James Lutton, Gentleman of East Greenwich, Kent 21 October 1663
- SEE Ancestry Digital Image
PROB 11/328/355 Will of Bridgett Lutton, Widow of East Greenwich, Kent 24 November 1668

PROB 11/327/573 Sentence of Brigetta Lutton, Widow of East Greenwich, Kent 13 November 1668
  1. PROB 11/328/355 Will of Bridgett Lutton, Widow of East Greenwich, Kent 24 November 1668
  2. Frederick Thomas Colby (ed.), The visitation of the county of Devon in the year 1620 (London, 1872), p.173, viewed 15/04/14
  3. PROB 11/312/242 Will of James Lutton, Gentleman of East Greenwich, Kent 21 October 1663
  4. PROB 11/328/355 Will of Bridgett Lutton, Widow of East Greenwich, Kent 24 November 1668
  5. Frederick Thomas Colby (ed.), The visitation of the county of Devon in the year 1620 (London, 1872), p.173, viewed 15/04/14