Difference between revisions of "MRP: C5/15/3 f. 2"
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | '''C5/15/3 f. 2''' | |
| + | |||
| + | '''Editorial history''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | 28/10/11, CSG: Created page | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | __TOC__ | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | == | + | ==Suggested links== |
| + | See biographical profile of [[MRP: Tobell Aylmer|Tobell Aylmer]] (the complainant) | ||
| + | See [[MRP: C5/15/3 f. 1|C5/15/3 f. 1]] (the bill of complaint, to which C5/15/3 f. 2 is the answer) | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | == | + | ==To do== |
| + | |||
| + | (1) Complete and check this transcription | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | == | + | ==Abstract & context== |
| − | + | The Chancery suit C5/15/3 was brought by complainant Tobell Aylmer against Sir Francis Williamson, Edmund Lascell Esquire and Phineas Rogers. | |
| + | |||
| + | [[MRP: C5/15/3 f. 1|C5/15/3 f. 1]] is the bill of complaint of Tobell Aylmer. C5/15/3 f. 2 is the answer of Sir Francis Williamson, Edmund Lascella nd Phineas Rogers. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The bill and the answer are dated 1653, and relate to alleged events in 1649. | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | == | + | ==Transcription== |
| + | |||
| + | //The joynt and severall answeres of S:r ffrancis Williamson knight Edmund Lascell Esq:r and Phineas Rogers three of the defts to the// | ||
| + | //bill of complainte of Tobell Aylmer Esq:r complaynante// | ||
| + | |||
| + | //All advantage | ||
| + | |||
| + | //now and at all | ||
| + | |||
| + | //answer unto | ||
| + | |||
| + | //and uniust | ||
| + | |||
| + | //XXXX satisfacconn | ||
| + | |||
| + | //pson or psons | ||
| + | |||
| + | //that hee beinge | ||
| + | |||
| + | //desire this defendant | ||
| + | |||
| + | //summe or summes | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Edward Clavell | ||
| + | |||
| + | //faithfull promise | ||
| + | |||
| + | //XXX ffrancis | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Dorothy | ||
| + | |||
| + | // the Complaynant | ||
| + | |||
| + | //settled and | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Complaynante | ||
| + | |||
| + | //now enioyeth | ||
| + | |||
| + | //above menconned | ||
| + | |||
| + | //bill menconned | ||
| + | |||
| + | //arise: And | ||
| + | |||
| + | //to bee paid | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Common Law | ||
| + | |||
| + | //is still in force | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Clovell did give | ||
| + | |||
| + | //estate of thesaid Clovell | ||
| + | |||
| + | //harmelesse him | ||
| + | |||
| + | //called | ||
| + | |||
| + | //this deft | ||
| + | |||
| + | //ever intended | ||
| + | |||
| + | //is before | ||
| + | |||
| + | //borrowed | ||
| + | |||
| + | //whatsoever | ||
| + | |||
| + | //these defendants | ||
| + | |||
| + | //say that the | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Reeve | ||
| + | |||
| + | //betweene | ||
| + | |||
| + | //effectuall | ||
| + | |||
| + | //dismissed | ||
| + | |||
| + | //theire reasonable costs and charges in this behalfe wrongfully susteyned// | ||
| + | //TIMO: POLLARD [Signature; botton RH side]// | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | == | + | |
| + | ==Notes== | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| + | ==Possible primary sources== | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''TNA''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | C 5/43/4 Aylmer v. Michenson: Essex 1663 | ||
| + | |||
| + | C 6/130/5 Short title: Aylmer v Clovile. Plaintiffs: Tobell Aylmer. Defendants: Edward Clovile, Joan Riddesdall and Edward Basse. Subject: property in West Hanningfield, Essex. Document type: bill, answer. 1654 | ||
| + | C 6/224/27A Short title: Clovill v Williamson. Plaintiffs: Mary Clovill and Elizabeth Clovill. Defendants: Edmund Williamson, Wignoll Bigg and John Rouse. Subject: property in Felsted, Essex. Document type: bill, answer. JFP 1677 | ||
| + | |||
| + | C 10/5/21 Edward Clovyle and Anne his wife, Tobell Aylmer, John Higden, Edward Shelton, Edmund Burton and others v Thomas Barker: West Hanningfield, Essex 1649 | ||
| + | C 10/93/11 Ball v. Blackwell, Aylmer, Starkey, Pary, Pratt, Cunditt: Middx 1662 | ||
Latest revision as of 08:38, January 5, 2012
C5/15/3 f. 2
Editorial history
28/10/11, CSG: Created page
Contents
[hide]Suggested links
See biographical profile of Tobell Aylmer (the complainant)
See C5/15/3 f. 1 (the bill of complaint, to which C5/15/3 f. 2 is the answer)
To do
(1) Complete and check this transcription
Abstract & context
The Chancery suit C5/15/3 was brought by complainant Tobell Aylmer against Sir Francis Williamson, Edmund Lascell Esquire and Phineas Rogers.
C5/15/3 f. 1 is the bill of complaint of Tobell Aylmer. C5/15/3 f. 2 is the answer of Sir Francis Williamson, Edmund Lascella nd Phineas Rogers.
The bill and the answer are dated 1653, and relate to alleged events in 1649.
Transcription
//The joynt and severall answeres of S:r ffrancis Williamson knight Edmund Lascell Esq:r and Phineas Rogers three of the defts to the//
//bill of complainte of Tobell Aylmer Esq:r complaynante//
//All advantage
//now and at all
//answer unto
//and uniust
//XXXX satisfacconn
//pson or psons
//that hee beinge
//desire this defendant
//summe or summes
//Edward Clavell
//faithfull promise
//XXX ffrancis
//Dorothy
// the Complaynant
//settled and
//Complaynante
//now enioyeth
//above menconned
//bill menconned
//arise: And
//to bee paid
//Common Law
//is still in force
//Clovell did give
//estate of thesaid Clovell
//harmelesse him
//called
//this deft
//ever intended
//is before
//borrowed
//whatsoever
//these defendants
//say that the
//Reeve
//betweene
//effectuall
//dismissed
//theire reasonable costs and charges in this behalfe wrongfully susteyned//
//TIMO: POLLARD [Signature; botton RH side]//
Notes
Possible primary sources
TNA
C 5/43/4 Aylmer v. Michenson: Essex 1663
C 6/130/5 Short title: Aylmer v Clovile. Plaintiffs: Tobell Aylmer. Defendants: Edward Clovile, Joan Riddesdall and Edward Basse. Subject: property in West Hanningfield, Essex. Document type: bill, answer. 1654
C 6/224/27A Short title: Clovill v Williamson. Plaintiffs: Mary Clovill and Elizabeth Clovill. Defendants: Edmund Williamson, Wignoll Bigg and John Rouse. Subject: property in Felsted, Essex. Document type: bill, answer. JFP 1677
C 10/5/21 Edward Clovyle and Anne his wife, Tobell Aylmer, John Higden, Edward Shelton, Edmund Burton and others v Thomas Barker: West Hanningfield, Essex 1649
C 10/93/11 Ball v. Blackwell, Aylmer, Starkey, Pary, Pratt, Cunditt: Middx 1662
