Difference between revisions of "MRP: C6/36/21 f. 4"
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
and doubt not but to prove shall bee were not and if the said Complt or the said Temple | and doubt not but to prove shall bee were not and if the said Complt or the said Temple | ||
| + | ................. | ||
| + | //Shipp being strong and substantiall and fitted for the said Voyage according to the said Charterparty departed from Gravesend and went the said Voyage and performed the same as she ought to doe and ended the said Voyage on or about the Two and Twentieth day of// | ||
| + | |||
| + | //June One thousand sixe hundred & nine But thid Defend:t soth expressly deny that the said Shipp to this Defendts knowledge or beleife was leaky or broaken or infirme and unfitt for the said Voyage as by the said Bill is p:rtended nor did the comp:lt or any for him except ag:t the ?cardimom of the Shipp// | ||
| + | |||
| + | //or p:rtend that the sd Shipp was not fitt for the sd Voyage to this Defend:ts knowledge otherwise than is herein after mencconned allthrough pn the behalfe | ||
Revision as of 21:24, November 13, 2011
C6/36/21 f. 4
Abstract
John Letten, one of the part owners of the William replied to a Bill of Complaint exhibited by George Cock and John ffenn in ?1667. C6/36/21 f. 4 is the reply to C6/36/21 f. 1)
Transcription
//The Severall Answer of John Letten one of the defendants to the Bill of Complaint of George Cock//
//and John ffenn Complaints//
//
Incertaintyes and other Imperfeconns in the sd Bill conteyned for Answer thereunto saith he knoweth not whether the Complt George Cock and//
//
the tyme in the Bill for that purpose menconned they did hire and take to freight the Shipp in the Bill named of Thomas Hubbard named for//
//
whereunto this defend:t confesseth he was and is made a party only to give his consent thereunto as parte owner of the same Shipp and not otherwise XXX//
//
for satisfaccon of this hon:ble Court and of the Complt touching the matters in question this defend:t saith was in the words XXX the effect in the XXXXX//
//
desires may be taken as parte of this defendts Answer//
//
to say one parte by the sd Thomas Hubbard and this Defendt to testifye his consent as aforesd and the other parte by the Complt and the sd James//
//
and consent of the Complt and the said James Temple and well known to them and by them well understood and approved of before the XXXXX thereof//
//
fraud ??innumeration undue practice contrivance or combynacon whatsoever of this defendt or any other to his this defendts knowledge or beleife. And this//
//
party but beleiveth that the Complt Cock and the sd Complt ppared or raised to be Shipped for the said Voyage a cargoe of Goods but what the particular//
//
and doubt not but to prove shall bee were not and if the said Complt or the said Temple
.................
//Shipp being strong and substantiall and fitted for the said Voyage according to the said Charterparty departed from Gravesend and went the said Voyage and performed the same as she ought to doe and ended the said Voyage on or about the Two and Twentieth day of//
//June One thousand sixe hundred & nine But thid Defend:t soth expressly deny that the said Shipp to this Defendts knowledge or beleife was leaky or broaken or infirme and unfitt for the said Voyage as by the said Bill is p:rtended nor did the comp:lt or any for him except ag:t the ?cardimom of the Shipp//
//or p:rtend that the sd Shipp was not fitt for the sd Voyage to this Defend:ts knowledge otherwise than is herein after mencconned allthrough pn the behalfe
Commentary
See C6/36/21 f. 1
See C6/36/21 f. 2
See C6/36/21 f. 3
