MRP: C6/36/21 f. 4
C6/36/21 f. 4
Abstract
John Letten, one of the part owners of the William replied to a Bill of Complaint exhibited by George Cock and John ffenn in ?1667.(C6/36/21 f. 4 is the reply to C6/36/21 f. 1)
Transcription
//The Severall Answer of John Letten one of the defendants to the Bill of Complaint of George Cock//
//and John ffenn Complaints//
//
Incertaintyes and other Imperfeconns in the sd Bill conteyned for Answer thereunto saith he knoweth not whether the Complt George Cock and//
//
the tyme in the Bill for that purpose menconned they did hire and take to freight the Shipp in the Bill named of Thomas Hubbard named for//
//
whereunto this defend:t confesseth he was and is made a party only to give his consent thereunto as parte owner of the same Shipp and not otherwise XXX//
//
for satisfaccon of this hon:ble Court and of the Complt touching the matters in question this defend:t saith was in the words XXX the effect in the XXXXX//
//
desires may be taken as parte of this defendts Answer//
//
to say one parte by the sd Thomas Hubbard and this Defendt to testifye his consent as aforesd and the other parte by the Complt and the sd James//
//
and consent of the Complt and the said James Temple and well known to them and by them well understood and approved of before the XXXXX thereof//
//
fraud ??innumeration undue practice contrivance or combynacon whatsoever of this defendt or any other to his this defendts knowledge or beleife. And this//
//
party but beleiveth that the Complt Cock and the sd Complt ppared or raised to be Shipped for the said Voyage a cargoe of Goods but what the particular//
//
and doubt not but to prove shall bee were not and if the said Complt or the said Temple
Commentary
See C6/36/21 f. 1
See C6/36/21 f. 2
See C6/36/21 f. 3
