Difference between revisions of "William Sarsfield"

From MarineLives
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{Banner}} {{SemBioLongInfoBoxThree |Person=William Sarsfield |First name=William |Last name=Sarsfield |Occupation=Purser |Mariner occupation=Purser |Training=Not apprentice |...")
 
m
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
|Has opening text=William Sarsfeild
 
|Has opening text=William Sarsfeild
 
|Has signoff text=Wm: Sarsfield
 
|Has signoff text=Wm: Sarsfield
−
|Transcription image={{#transcription-image: }}
+
|Transcription image={{#transcription-image: }}
 
|Language skills=English language,
 
|Language skills=English language,
 
|Res street=Wapping
 
|Res street=Wapping
Line 37: Line 37:
 
Twenty-one year old William Sarsfield deposed on December 14th 1660 in the High Court of Admiralty. He ws examined touching the perishablenes of some sugers brought hether in the ''William and John''.<ref>[[HCA 13/73 f.769r Annotate|HCA 13/73 f.769r]]</ref>
 
Twenty-one year old William Sarsfield deposed on December 14th 1660 in the High Court of Admiralty. He ws examined touching the perishablenes of some sugers brought hether in the ''William and John''.<ref>[[HCA 13/73 f.769r Annotate|HCA 13/73 f.769r]]</ref>
  
−
William Sarsfield stated that there was a parcel of four tons of brown sugars brought from Barbados in the ship the ''William and John'' (Master: William Goodlad). The sugars had been condemned in the Admiralty Court for freight due on them. The sugars were "n a perishable condition and doe dayly purge, an did some course be not spedily taken with them they will be soone spoiled".
+
William Sarsfield stated that there was a parcel of four tons of brown sugars brought from Barbados in the ship the ''William and John'' (Master: William Goodlad). The sugars had been condemned in the Admiralty Court for freight due on them. The sugars were "in a perishable condition and doe dayly purge, an did some course be not spedily taken with them they will be soone spoiled".
  
 
William Sarsfield's deposition took place two days after the Primum Decretum of the Court, which is the "condemnation", which Sarsfield refers to. The schedule for the sugars has survived as an attachment to the Primum Decretum of the Court, dated December 12th 1654. Both this schedule and the Latin Primum Decretum are exhibited below.
 
William Sarsfield's deposition took place two days after the Primum Decretum of the Court, which is the "condemnation", which Sarsfield refers to. The schedule for the sugars has survived as an attachment to the Primum Decretum of the Court, dated December 12th 1654. Both this schedule and the Latin Primum Decretum are exhibited below.
  
−
[ADD SCHEDULE]
+
[[File:William & John Sugars 1660 IMG 112 10 5604.PNG|800px|thumbnail|left|HCA 24/114 Schedule of sugars brought from Barbados by William Goodlad, attached to the Primum Decretum in the cause in the High Court of Admiralty of 'William Goodlad against the William and John', dated Dec 12th 1660]]
−
 
+
−
[ADD PRIMUM DECRETUM]
+
  
 
==Comment on sources==
 
==Comment on sources==
 +
'''1640'''
 +
 +
PROB 11/182/388 Will of William Goodlad, Mariner of Leigh, Essex 13 March 1640
 +
 +
'''1689'''
 +
 +
PROB 11/395/52 Will of William Goodlad, Mariner being now bound out on a Voyage in the East India Company's Service to Some Port or Places in the East Indies in and with the Good Ship or Vessel Loyal Adventure of Stepney, Middlesex 16 April 1689
 +
 +
'''In dei nomine Amen''', Coram vobis vonli et agregio viro Richo Zouch legum doctore, Suprme Curiae Admirallitatis Anglia, Locumtenen, Judico Praesiden
 +
[?XXX] constituto, vestrabe Surrogato, aut alie Judico in hac parte rempeten querungus, Pars Willmi Goodlad, [?XXX]qr sonorm Proprietarion Navis cuisdam voratathe ''William and John''
 +
[?XXXX] dictus Willmus Goodlad erat maga) con[?XX] Bona in schedula putitus annex in mentionat at con[?XX] quam[?unqr] personam sivo quasrunqr personas Justitulum aut interesse in eisdem
 +
haben sua habere prtemen dicit aut et in hic scriptis in Juris preponit Quod mensibius Marty Aprilis May Juny July Augusti, Septembri; Octobr: Novembr: decembr, January February
 +
et Marty Anius Dei 1658 et 1659 nernon mensibus Marty Aprilis May Juny July Augusti et Septembris hac instand Anno. 1660. Praefatus Willimus Goodlad et sory fuit aut
 +
et erunt din sive Proprietary Sicta Navis the ''William and John'', omsqr Apparatuu et Attessionu propr talib) at at talei remuniter dicti habiti et reopatati, Eandenaqr Navem pro viagio maritimo
 +
in struxerunt et praepararunt et ad partei [?tuns]marinas destinarunt et eimserunt, Quodqr infra twmpus productu dicta Navis ad Insula de Barbados salva appulit, danqr ibn moratatus
 +
Omnia et singula Bona schedulata, inter alia quaimplierima) in dictam navem ad Portum do London addurenda, imposita fuorunt et onorata, Eademqu's omnia et singula in dicta Nave
 +
the ''William and John'' ad dict Portum de London salvo addurobatr et do super ad soltendum naulum, ac alias expensas et onera eisdem Bonis incumbentia abnoxia siebant
 +
et tenebahtia Quosqr Naulum, und in Primagio et Areragie anglia Primage and Average pro eisdem Bonis debita, ad deporales summas in dicti schedula respective mente=
 +
=onat, coniunctim summa facientes viginti et umus Librar duoderim sotidoru et unicus denary extendebat, tantaqr seperales perumaru summa pro Naulo ac Primagio et
 +
Average Bonorum ab Insula de Barbados ad hunc Porta London adduct ex longe usu et consuetudina salvi consueverunt sirqr prefatis Willmo Goodlad et sorys pro Naulo
 +
premagio at Avegagio Bonoru Schedulatatera salvi debuereunt et prettaru, Quodqr dicti Navis dictis Bonis schedulatis onusta ad huin Porta London per quatner menses et ultra elapses appulit et cetra
 +
 +
[ADD DATA]
 +
 +
[[File:Primum Decretum William & John IMG 112 10 5609.PNG|1200px|thumbnail|left|HCA 24/114 Primum Decretum in the cause in the High Court of Admiralty of 'William Goodlad against the William and John', dated Dec 12th 1660]]

Latest revision as of 22:54, October 31, 2016


William Sarsfield

William Sarsfield
Person William Sarsfield
Title
First name William
Middle name(s)
Last name Sarsfield
Suffix
Spouse of
Widow of
Occupation Purser
Secondary shorebased occupation
Mariner occupation Purser
Associated with ship(s)
Training Not apprentice
Is apprentice of
Was apprentice of
Had apprentice(s)
Citizen Unknown
Literacy Signature
Has opening text William Sarsfeild
Has signoff text Wm: Sarsfield
Signoff image (Invalid transcription image)
Language skills English language
Has interpreter
Birth street
Birth parish
Birth town
Birth county
Birth province
Birth country
Res street Wapping
Res parish
Res town
Res county Middlesex
Res province
Res country England
Birth year 1639
Marriage year
Death year
Probate date
First deposition age 21
Primary sources
Act book start page(s)
Personal answer start page(s)
Allegation start page(s)
Interrogatories page(s)
Deposition start page(s) HCA 13/73 f.769r Annotate
Chancery start page(s)
Letter start page(s)
Miscellaneous start page(s)
Act book date(s)
Personal answer date(s)
Allegation date(s)
Interrogatories date(s)
Deposition date(s) Dec 14 1660
How complete is this biography?
Has infobox completed Yes
Has synthesis completed No
Has HCA evidence completed No
Has source comment completed No
Ship classification
Type of ship Merchant ship
Silver Ship litigation in 1650s
Role in Silver Ship litigation None


Biographical synthesis

William Sarsfield (alt. Sarsfeild) (b. ca. 1639; d. ?). Purser.

Purser of the ship the William and John (Master: William Goodlad)

Resident in 1660 in Wapping.

Evidence from High Court of Admiralty

Twenty-one year old William Sarsfield deposed on December 14th 1660 in the High Court of Admiralty. He ws examined touching the perishablenes of some sugers brought hether in the William and John.[1]

William Sarsfield stated that there was a parcel of four tons of brown sugars brought from Barbados in the ship the William and John (Master: William Goodlad). The sugars had been condemned in the Admiralty Court for freight due on them. The sugars were "in a perishable condition and doe dayly purge, an did some course be not spedily taken with them they will be soone spoiled".

William Sarsfield's deposition took place two days after the Primum Decretum of the Court, which is the "condemnation", which Sarsfield refers to. The schedule for the sugars has survived as an attachment to the Primum Decretum of the Court, dated December 12th 1654. Both this schedule and the Latin Primum Decretum are exhibited below.

HCA 24/114 Schedule of sugars brought from Barbados by William Goodlad, attached to the Primum Decretum in the cause in the High Court of Admiralty of 'William Goodlad against the William and John', dated Dec 12th 1660

Comment on sources

1640

PROB 11/182/388 Will of William Goodlad, Mariner of Leigh, Essex 13 March 1640

1689

PROB 11/395/52 Will of William Goodlad, Mariner being now bound out on a Voyage in the East India Company's Service to Some Port or Places in the East Indies in and with the Good Ship or Vessel Loyal Adventure of Stepney, Middlesex 16 April 1689

In dei nomine Amen, Coram vobis vonli et agregio viro Richo Zouch legum doctore, Suprme Curiae Admirallitatis Anglia, Locumtenen, Judico Praesiden
[?XXX] constituto, vestrabe Surrogato, aut alie Judico in hac parte rempeten querungus, Pars Willmi Goodlad, [?XXX]qr sonorm Proprietarion Navis cuisdam voratathe William and John
[?XXXX] dictus Willmus Goodlad erat maga) con[?XX] Bona in schedula putitus annex in mentionat at con[?XX] quam[?unqr] personam sivo quasrunqr personas Justitulum aut interesse in eisdem
haben sua habere prtemen dicit aut et in hic scriptis in Juris preponit Quod mensibius Marty Aprilis May Juny July Augusti, Septembri; Octobr: Novembr: decembr, January February
et Marty Anius Dei 1658 et 1659 nernon mensibus Marty Aprilis May Juny July Augusti et Septembris hac instand Anno. 1660. Praefatus Willimus Goodlad et sory fuit aut
et erunt din sive Proprietary Sicta Navis the William and John, omsqr Apparatuu et Attessionu propr talib) at at talei remuniter dicti habiti et reopatati, Eandenaqr Navem pro viagio maritimo
in struxerunt et praepararunt et ad partei [?tuns]marinas destinarunt et eimserunt, Quodqr infra twmpus productu dicta Navis ad Insula de Barbados salva appulit, danqr ibn moratatus
Omnia et singula Bona schedulata, inter alia quaimplierima) in dictam navem ad Portum do London addurenda, imposita fuorunt et onorata, Eademqu's omnia et singula in dicta Nave
the William and John ad dict Portum de London salvo addurobatr et do super ad soltendum naulum, ac alias expensas et onera eisdem Bonis incumbentia abnoxia siebant
et tenebahtia Quosqr Naulum, und in Primagio et Areragie anglia Primage and Average pro eisdem Bonis debita, ad deporales summas in dicti schedula respective mente=
=onat, coniunctim summa facientes viginti et umus Librar duoderim sotidoru et unicus denary extendebat, tantaqr seperales perumaru summa pro Naulo ac Primagio et
Average Bonorum ab Insula de Barbados ad hunc Porta London adduct ex longe usu et consuetudina salvi consueverunt sirqr prefatis Willmo Goodlad et sorys pro Naulo
premagio at Avegagio Bonoru Schedulatatera salvi debuereunt et prettaru, Quodqr dicti Navis dictis Bonis schedulatis onusta ad huin Porta London per quatner menses et ultra elapses appulit et cetra

[ADD DATA]

HCA 24/114 Primum Decretum in the cause in the High Court of Admiralty of 'William Goodlad against the William and John', dated Dec 12th 1660
  1. ↑ HCA 13/73 f.769r

Retrieved from ‘http://www.marinelives.org/index.php?title=William_Sarsfield&oldid=116957’