| Transcription
|
And saith that the bill of lading to the s … And saith that the bill of lading to the sayd allegation annexed was and is<br />
one of the sayd originall bills of lading for the sayd 2248 peices of<br />
8/8 which this deponent saw as aforesayd signed att Bilboa And further<br />
saith that although in the sayd bill and the other 2 bills mentioned as aforesayd<br />
to be signed for the same the sayd moneyes are entred for teh Accompt of<br />
John White, Andrew Creagh and Patrick Creagh yet in truth the sayd<br />
moneyes doe appertaine to the sayd Andrew and Patrick onely by way of<br />
property, and not to the sayd John White, the reason of this deponents<br />
knowledge in the premisses was and is, for that before the lading of the<br />
sayd moneyes as aforesayd he saw in the hands of the sayd David [?England]<br />
an order or direction under the hand of the sayd Andrew Creagh for the<br />
receyving of and from ffrances Bodkin of Bilboa 800 dukets of plate<br />
and to remitt the same in peices of 8/8 to Nantes there to be disposed by<br />
the directon of the sayd John White for the Accompt of the producents of<br />
which John White was and is a ffactor of and for the producents; and [?saith]<br />
likewise att the same tyme a letter and bill of exchange drawne by the<br />
sayd Andrew Creagh in the hands of the sayd ffrancis Badkin who was ?pXXX<br />
ordered to pay 800 ducatts of plate to the sayd David England. And this<br />
deponent saith he saw the sayd 800 duckatts accordingly payd to the<br />
sayd England by the sayd Badkin, and knoweth that the sayd England<br />
did convert them into peices of 8/8. and that he did lade them as he [?XX]<br />
for the Accompt aforesayd. And otherwise referring himselfe [?to the]<br />
Acts of this Court he cannot depose saving his subsequent deposition.
To the sixth article of the sayd allegation. this deponent saith that soone after the [?lading]<br />
of the sayd moneyes he saw the sayd David England att Biboa signe [?XXX]<br />
and direct a letter of Advise directed to Patrick Rice att Nantes being the correspondent<br />
of the sayd John White, touching the moneyes now in question and [?sawe]<br />
a bill of lading was sent together with the sayd letter. And further he cannot<br />
depose.
To the seventh article of the sayd allegation he saith that for the reasons aforesaid<br />
he is well assured and verily beleiveth that noe subiect of the States of the<br />
united Provinces or King of ffrance had or hath any share or Interest<br />
in the sayd moneyes, nor the subiect of any Prince or State in [hostility]<br />
with this Commonwealth. And otherwise referring himselfe to his<br />
foregoeing depositions he cannot depose.
To the eighth and ninth articles of the sayd allegation This deponent saith and deposeth<br />
that the sayd David England is an Irishman and so accounted and the<br />
sayd Patrick Rice is by common report an Irishman and did in June<br />
and July last reside as a Merchant stranger att Nantes, and both or<br />
eyther of them were and are by like repute factors of and for the producent<br />
and never were nor are subiects of the sayd States of the United Provinces<br />
ffrench King or any Prince or State in Enmity with England that this<br />
deponent ever knew or heard of. And otherwise cannot depose.
To the tenth he saith that after the lading of the sayd moneyes oas aforesayd<br />
the sayd shipp ''Saint Peter'' sett sayle from Balboa and in her course to [?XXX]<br />
whither she was bound was taken and seized by the shipp ''Handmaide''<br />
arlate whereof Captaine Wills was Commander, and saith he this deponent<br />
being then a Passenger aboard the sayd shipp then saw the sayd [?XXX]<br />
[?XXX]hen saw the sayd [?XXX]<br />
[?XXX] +
, And saith that the bill of lading to the s … And saith that the bill of lading to the sayd allegation annexed was and is<br />
one of the sayd originall bills of lading for the sayd 2248 peices of<br />
8/8 which this deponent saw as aforesayd signed att Bilboa And further<br />
saith that although in the sayd bill and the other 2 bills mentioned as aforesayd<br />
to be signed for the same the sayd moneyes are entred for teh Accompt of<br />
John White, Andrew Creagh and Patrick Creagh yet in truth the sayd<br />
moneyes doe appertaine to the sayd Andrew and Patrick onely by way of<br />
property, and not to the sayd John White, the reason of this deponents<br />
knowledge in the premisses was and is, for that before the lading of the<br />
sayd moneyes as aforesayd he saw in the hands of the sayd David [?England]<br />
an order or direction under the hand of the sayd Andrew Creagh for the<br />
receyving of and from ffrances Bodkin of Bilboa 800 dukets of plate<br />
and to remitt the same in peices of 8/8 to Nantes there to be disposed by<br />
the directon of the sayd John White for the Accompt of the producents of<br />
which John White was and is a ffactor of and for the producents; and [?saith]<br />
likewise att the same tyme a letter and bill of exchange drawne by the<br />
sayd Andrew Creagh in the hands of the sayd ffrancis Badkin who was ?pXXX<br />
ordered to pay 800 ducatts of plate to the sayd David England. And this<br />
deponent saith he saw the sayd 800 duckatts accordingly payd to the<br />
sayd England by the sayd Badkin, and knoweth that the sayd England<br />
did convert them into peices of 8/8. and that he did lade them as he [?XX]<br />
for the Accompt aforesayd. And otherwise referring himselfe [?to the]<br />
Acts of this Court he cannot depose saving his subsequent deposition.
To the sixth article of the sayd allegation. this deponent saith that soone after the [?lading]<br />
of the sayd moneyes he saw the sayd David England att Biboa signe [?XXX]<br />
and direct a letter of Advise directed to Patrick Rice att Nantes being the correspondent<br />
of the sayd John White, touching the moneyes now in question and [?sawe]<br />
a bill of lading was sent together with the sayd letter. And further he cannot<br />
depose.
To the seventh article of the sayd allegation he saith that for the reasons aforesaid<br />
he is well assured and verily beleiveth that noe subiect of the States of the<br />
united Provinces or King of ffrance had or hath any share or Interest<br />
in the sayd moneyes, nor the subiect of any Prince or State in [hostility]<br />
with this Commonwealth. And otherwise referring himselfe to his<br />
foregoeing depositions he cannot depose.
To the eighth and ninth articles of the sayd allegation This deponent saith and deposeth<br />
that the sayd David England is an Irishman and so accounted and the<br />
sayd Patrick Rice is by common report an Irishman and did in June<br />
and July last reside as a Merchant stranger att Nantes, and both or<br />
eyther of them were and are by like repute factors of and for the producent<br />
and never were nor are subiects of the sayd States of the United Provinces<br />
ffrench King or any Prince or State in Enmity with England that this<br />
deponent ever knew or heard of. And otherwise cannot depose.
To the tenth he saith that after the lading of the sayd moneyes oas aforesayd<br />
the sayd shipp ''Saint Peter'' sett sayle from Balboa and in her course to [?XXX]<br />
whither she was bound was taken and seized by the shipp ''Handmaide''<br />
arlate whereof Captaine Wills was Commander, and saith he this deponent<br />
being then a Passenger aboard the sayd shipp then saw the sayd [?XXX]<br />
[?XXX]hen saw the sayd [?XXX]<br />
[?XXX] +
|
