| Transcription
|
'''Y.Y.'''
The 4.th day of November . 165 … '''Y.Y.'''
The 4.th day of November . 1653:-/ [CENTRE HEADING]
The Clayme of Giles Risheuvel and Melchior Rediquer}<br />
for their goods in the ''White Angell'', John Lewison de}<br />
[Vischer] master) Smith. Budd.}
Examined upon the said Allegation
'''[?Rp.]'''
'''2.us'''
'''3.us/''' (sic)
'''Peter Vande Wyer''' of dunquirke in fflanders<br />
Merchant aged 26. yeares or thereabouts sworne<br />
and examined/:-
To the first second third and 4th articles of the said Allegation hee saith and deposeth<br />
That n the moneth of March last past, and before and to this present<br />
the arlate Giles Risheuvel a Merchant of Antwerp was and is the<br />
true and lawfull Owner and Proprietor of ten pipes and ten quartels of
'''CR''' [FIRST MARKE, LH MARGIN]
oyle marked with the first marke in the margent, and the arlate Melchior<br />
Rediquer at the time aforesaid and till this present was and is also the true and
'''MR''' [SECOND MARKE, LH MARGIN]
onely Proprietor of ten pipes and 6. quartels of oyle of the second marke<br />
in the Margent, and for and as such Owners they were and are commonly<br />
reputed; which said respective parcells of oyles were in or about the<br />
moneth predeposed laden and putt on board the said shipp the ''White''<br />
''Angell'' at or neare Mallega by one Andries von Cantlebeck an Antwerper<br />
and subiect of the King of Spaine ffactor and Correspondent to the said producents<br />
for their respective Accompts, to be transported in the said shipp to dunquirke<br />
and there to be respectively delivered to the said producents or their Assignes<br />
for their use; Which hee knoweth for that this deponent<br />
after the said shipp and her lading were surprized and taken and brought up into<br />
England received letters of advise from the said producents. and also from the said<br />
Andries van Cantlebecke his Correspondent, jointly concerning and expressing that<br />
the said oyles were so laden for the accompt of the said producents respectively;<br />
and whereas the said shipp and her principall Cargo did, (as in this Court hath been clearly [?proved, ALTERNATIVELY, predeposed]<br />
belong unto one John Bollart a Merchant of Antwerp, between whom and<br />
this deponent and the said Andries van Cantelbeck there hath bin mutual Correspon<br />
dence in trade for severall yeares last past, this deponent in a letter of advise as<br />
aforesaid from the said Cantelbeck received a particular accompt of all the goods laden aboard the said shipp<br />
by him the said ffactor and for whose accompt and adventure hee had respectively<br />
laden and putt the same aboard, and in particular that the oyles predeposed and now<br />
Claymed were laden by him for the respective accompts predeposed; And otherwise<br />
saving his following depositions hee saith hee cannot depose:/:-
To the 5th hee saith, That the said shipp with the oyles predeposed aboard her<br />
in her Course from Cadiz towards dunquirke was mett withall surprized and<br />
taken by some of the shipps of the Commonwealth shee having then two bbills of ading<br />
aboard for and concerning the interest of the producents in the sayd oyles then aboard<br />
her, which bills of lading are remaining in the Registry of this Court, as hee<br />
beleeveth. And otherwise cannot depose:-/
To the 6th hee saith, That for the reasons predeposed hee is fully assured that<br />
the oyles predeposed were really and actually to have been delivered unto the<br />
said producents each according to their respective proportions, for whoe<br />
(accomptsroportions, for whoe<br />
(accompts +
|
