| Transcription
|
servant did copy out the said Letter the p … servant did copy out the said Letter the producent wrote and<br />
sent unto the said William Carey, and doth well remember<br />
and knowe that the contents of the said Letter were as is<br />
by jim predeposed And further he cannot depose./
To the second article of the sayd allegation and to the first<br />
and second schedules therin mentioned he deposeth and saith<br />
That he hath seene here in this Citty of London the arlate<br />
James Churchey, and that he knoweth him to bee an<br />
Englishman , and that he hath credibly heard that the arlar Nicholas<br />
Saunders is an Englishman, and that before he<br />
went into ffrance he lived in the West part of England,<br />
And he further deposeth that the first schedule is all the<br />
proper handwriting of the arlate William Cary, and alsoe<br />
that William Cary subscribed unto the second schedule is<br />
the proper handwriting of him the arlate William Cary,<br />
The which he knoweth having often seene his the said<br />
Cary's handwriting and that therby he is well acquainted therewith<br />
And he saith that of his certaine knowledge the<br />
producent did by bills of exchange remitt the moneys unto<br />
the said Cary that bought the said Tobacco's, And otherwise<br />
referring himselfe to the said two schedules he cannot depose./
To the third article and to the schedule therin mentioned he<br />
cannot depose./
To the fourth he saith that the Dutch shipp wherin the<br />
tenne hogsheads of Tobacco's were laden for the Accompt of<br />
the producent was (as he hath heard) seized upon by an<br />
English private man of warr between Bourdeaux and<br />
Morleaux And further he cannot depose./
To the Interrogatoryes [CENTRE HEADING]
To the first Interrogatory he answereth that he commeth to testify<br />
in this cause by the order of the producent his Master, and<br />
that it wilbee neither benefitt nor preiudice to him the REndent<br />
whether the goods interrate bee recovered or lost And to the rest he answereth negatively.
To the second Interrogatory he answereth that the aforenamed William<br />
Cary did pay in ffrance for the Tobacco's interrate with the interrate<br />
harbyn's money, The premisses he knoweth for that he this<br />
Rendent did for his Master pay the money unto one Mr John<br />
Clerke of London Merchant, who drew a bill upon a Merchant<br />
in Rochell for the sayd money to be payd unto the said Cary<br />
for the producents accompt, But he saith he now doth not<br />
remember the certaine summe of money he soe payd for the producent<br />
and that he never was in ffrance, And further he cannot<br />
answeare
To the third he answereth that he referreth himselfe to his deposition<br />
made to the first article of the allegation, And further saving that<br />
the said Letter was all written by the producent he cannot answeare.
The fourth and fifth Interrogatoryes concerne not this Rendent./
Repeated before Doctor Clerk./
Hen: Harbin [SIGNATURE, RH SIDE] Clerk./
Hen: Harbin [SIGNATURE, RH SIDE] +
|
