| Transcription
|
To the fourth Interrogatory he answereth t … To the fourth Interrogatory he answereth that he this Rendent<br />
was (as doth evidently appeare by his foregoeing deposition)<br />
here in London when the said Linnens were bought<br />
and therfore cannot answeare wjp bought, or of<br />
whome were bought the Linnens interrate but he saith he<br />
is upon good reasons convinced in his conscience that the<br />
sayd Linnens were bought for the accompt of the said<br />
Bartholomew Lopez de Apastris, with the proceed of the<br />
wools interrate, and that the said nine bales of Linnen<br />
were readlly laden aboard the sauyd shipp for his account<br />
and not for the account of any french man of subiect<br />
of the ffrench king And otherwise he knoweth not to<br />
answeare./
To the fifth Interrogatory he answereth that he referreth himselfe<br />
to his foregoeing deposition, And otherwise or further being<br />
here in London when the businesses interrate were done, and<br />
transacted beyond the seas, he cannot answeare/
To the sixth Interrogatory he answereth that he was not present<br />
when the bills of Lading interrate or any one of them were<br />
signe, And further referring himselfe to his deposition<br />
made to the eighth article of the allegation he cannot<br />
answeare./
To the seaventh Interrogatory he answereth that he being by the<br />
aforenamed Melchior Arang[?uren] still made privy unto<br />
and advised with concerning the said woolls, and with the<br />
buying and lading of the nine bales of Linnens (being<br />
the proceed of the said woolls) for the account of the<br />
sayd Lopez de Apastris on board the said shipp the<br />
''hare in the ffeild'' and not finding nor perceiving anything<br />
in the whole busines to seeme fictitious or colourable<br />
that he beleiveth in his conscience that the bill of Lading<br />
which he saw for the said Linnens (and which as he<br />
heareth is [?gone]) annexed unto a Commmission decreed in this<br />
cause into Roane or haverdegrace in ffrance) was a true<br />
and reall bill of Lading, And further he knoweth<br />
not to answeare./
To the eight Interrogatory he answereth that he knoweth not the<br />
said Peter Grout, and that for the reasons predeposed he<br />
beleiveth that the said Grout hath noe part or share in the Linnens<br />
interrate, And further he knoweth not to answere./
To the ninth Interrogatory he answereth that as to the advise and [?XXX] sent<br />
unto the interrate Lopez de Apastris or his Agents at Cadiz<br />
by the said Bertramd e Baud and Mathew de La ffitt<br />
it concerneth not him to answeare, he having not deposed to<br />
any such matter, But he saith that the said [?Aranguren]<br />
did communicate unto this Rendent the advise and accompt by<br />
him this REndent predeposed of, which he the said [?Aranguren]<br />
had received from the said de Baud and de La ffitt, and<br />
that the said advise and accompt were both shewne<br />
unto accompt were both shewne<br />
unto +
|
