Joos de Waede

From MarineLives
Jump to: navigation, search



Joos de Waede
Person Joos de Waede
Title
First name Joos
Middle name(s)
Last name De Waede
Suffix
Spouse of
Widow of
Occupation Mariner
Secondary shorebased occupation
Mariner occupation Carpenter
Associated with ship(s) Dolphin of Dunkirk (Master: Christian Sola)
Training Not apprentice
Is apprentice of
Was apprentice of
Had apprentice(s)
Citizen Unknown
Literacy Marke
Has opening text Joos de Waede
Has signoff text Symbol
Signoff image (Invalid transcription image)
Language skills Dutch language
Has interpreter
Birth street
Birth parish
Birth town
Birth county
Birth province
Birth country
Res street
Res parish
Res town Dunkirk
Res county
Res province Flanders
Res country Spanish Netherlands
Birth year 1626
Marriage year
Death year
Probate date
First deposition age 28
Primary sources
Act book start page(s)
Personal answer start page(s)
Allegation start page(s)
Interrogatories page(s)
Deposition start page(s) HCA 13/68 f.513r Annotate
Chancery start page(s)
Letter start page(s)
Miscellaneous start page(s)
Act book date(s)
Personal answer date(s)
Allegation date(s)
Interrogatories date(s)
Deposition date(s) Apr 4 1654
How complete is this biography?
Has infobox completed Yes
Has synthesis completed No
Has HCA evidence completed No
Has source comment completed No
Ship classification
Type of ship Merchant ship
Silver Ship litigation in 1650s
Role in Silver Ship litigation None


Biographical synthesis

Joose de Waede (b. ca. 1636; d. ?). Mariner.

Carpenter of the ship the Dolphin of Dunkirk (Master: Christian Sola).

Resident in 1654 in Dunkirk.

Evidence from High Court of Admiralty

Twenty-eight year old Joos de Waede deposed on April 4th 1654 in the High Court of Admiralty.[1] He was examined on interrogatories in the cause of "Pickering and company against the shipp the Dolphin, Christian Sola master".[2]

The case concerned the seizure of the Dolphin, allegedly a ship of Dunkirk, by an English private man of war. The mariners of the Dolphin claimed that their ship was on a voyage from Bordeaux to Danzig with a lading of wines, but the counter claim by the English is that she was bound for the United Provinces.

Comment on sources

  1. HCA 13/68 f.513r
  2. HCA 13/68 f.511v